不同动脉压下林格氏液和 20% 白蛋白的利尿反应。

IF 2.2 Q3 PHYSIOLOGY
Robert G Hahn, Markus Zdolsek, Michaela Gunnström, Emma Hasselgren, Joachim H Zdolsek
{"title":"不同动脉压下林格氏液和 20% 白蛋白的利尿反应。","authors":"Robert G Hahn, Markus Zdolsek, Michaela Gunnström, Emma Hasselgren, Joachim H Zdolsek","doi":"10.14814/phy2.70069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Intravenous volume loading is a common treatment when hypovolemia is a potential cause of oliguria. We studied whether the effectiveness of Ringer's solution and 20% albumin in inducing diuresis differs depending on the mean arterial pressure (MAP). For this purpose, volume kinetic analysis was performed based on urine output and hemoglobin-derived plasma dilution obtained during and after 136 infusions of Ringer and 85 infusions of 20% albumin. Covariance analysis quantified the diuretic response at different arterial pressures. The results show that the diuretic response to a known plasma volume expansion was greater for Ringer's solution above a MAP of 70 mmHg, while 20% albumin was significantly more effective at lower pressures (p < 0.03). Simulations of the urinary output in response to infusion of a predefined fluid volume yielded superior efficacy for 20% albumin when the MAP was low, while Ringer's was similarly effective when the MAP averaged 100 mmHg. In conclusion, urine output in response to plasma volume expansion with 20% albumin was similar to, or even stronger, than that of Ringer's solution when the MAP was below 70 mmHg.</p>","PeriodicalId":20083,"journal":{"name":"Physiological Reports","volume":"12 19","pages":"e70069"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11458327/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diuretic responses to Ringer's solution and 20% albumin at different arterial pressures.\",\"authors\":\"Robert G Hahn, Markus Zdolsek, Michaela Gunnström, Emma Hasselgren, Joachim H Zdolsek\",\"doi\":\"10.14814/phy2.70069\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Intravenous volume loading is a common treatment when hypovolemia is a potential cause of oliguria. We studied whether the effectiveness of Ringer's solution and 20% albumin in inducing diuresis differs depending on the mean arterial pressure (MAP). For this purpose, volume kinetic analysis was performed based on urine output and hemoglobin-derived plasma dilution obtained during and after 136 infusions of Ringer and 85 infusions of 20% albumin. Covariance analysis quantified the diuretic response at different arterial pressures. The results show that the diuretic response to a known plasma volume expansion was greater for Ringer's solution above a MAP of 70 mmHg, while 20% albumin was significantly more effective at lower pressures (p < 0.03). Simulations of the urinary output in response to infusion of a predefined fluid volume yielded superior efficacy for 20% albumin when the MAP was low, while Ringer's was similarly effective when the MAP averaged 100 mmHg. In conclusion, urine output in response to plasma volume expansion with 20% albumin was similar to, or even stronger, than that of Ringer's solution when the MAP was below 70 mmHg.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20083,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physiological Reports\",\"volume\":\"12 19\",\"pages\":\"e70069\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11458327/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physiological Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14814/phy2.70069\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiological Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14814/phy2.70069","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

当低血容量是导致少尿的潜在原因时,静脉容量负荷是一种常见的治疗方法。我们研究了林格氏溶液和 20% 白蛋白诱导利尿的效果是否因平均动脉压 (MAP) 而异。为此,我们根据 136 次输注林格氏溶液和 85 次输注 20% 白蛋白期间和之后获得的尿量和血红蛋白衍生血浆稀释进行了容量动力学分析。协方差分析量化了不同动脉压下的利尿反应。结果显示,林格溶液对已知血浆容量扩张的利尿反应在 MAP 超过 70 mmHg 时更大,而 20% 的白蛋白在较低压力下明显更有效(p<0.05)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Diuretic responses to Ringer's solution and 20% albumin at different arterial pressures.

Intravenous volume loading is a common treatment when hypovolemia is a potential cause of oliguria. We studied whether the effectiveness of Ringer's solution and 20% albumin in inducing diuresis differs depending on the mean arterial pressure (MAP). For this purpose, volume kinetic analysis was performed based on urine output and hemoglobin-derived plasma dilution obtained during and after 136 infusions of Ringer and 85 infusions of 20% albumin. Covariance analysis quantified the diuretic response at different arterial pressures. The results show that the diuretic response to a known plasma volume expansion was greater for Ringer's solution above a MAP of 70 mmHg, while 20% albumin was significantly more effective at lower pressures (p < 0.03). Simulations of the urinary output in response to infusion of a predefined fluid volume yielded superior efficacy for 20% albumin when the MAP was low, while Ringer's was similarly effective when the MAP averaged 100 mmHg. In conclusion, urine output in response to plasma volume expansion with 20% albumin was similar to, or even stronger, than that of Ringer's solution when the MAP was below 70 mmHg.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Physiological Reports
Physiological Reports PHYSIOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
4.00%
发文量
374
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Physiological Reports is an online only, open access journal that will publish peer reviewed research across all areas of basic, translational, and clinical physiology and allied disciplines. Physiological Reports is a collaboration between The Physiological Society and the American Physiological Society, and is therefore in a unique position to serve the international physiology community through quick time to publication while upholding a quality standard of sound research that constitutes a useful contribution to the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信