患者对正畸治疗过程中微型螺钉的看法--带 Meta 分析的系统性综述。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Francisco Vale, Raquel Travassos, Isabela Couto, Madalena Ribeiro, Filipa Marques, Francisco Caramelo, Carlos Miguel Marto, Gianrico Spagnuolo, Anabela Baptista Paula, Catarina Nunes, Inês Francisco
{"title":"患者对正畸治疗过程中微型螺钉的看法--带 Meta 分析的系统性综述。","authors":"Francisco Vale, Raquel Travassos, Isabela Couto, Madalena Ribeiro, Filipa Marques, Francisco Caramelo, Carlos Miguel Marto, Gianrico Spagnuolo, Anabela Baptista Paula, Catarina Nunes, Inês Francisco","doi":"10.1111/ocr.12864","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>During orthodontic treatment, undesirable reciprocal forces are generated during tooth movement, which explains the use of anchorage strategies to minimise their harmful effects through intra and/or extraoral appliances. Miniscrews are intraoral devices used for temporary skeletal anchorage. Miniscrews are small-sized intraoral devices used for temporary skeletal anchorage and are easy to place and remove. However, some studies refer to adverse effects such as inflammation, pain, and discomfort. This systematic review aims to synthesise the available evidence on the use of miniscrews during orthodontic treatment from the patient's perspective. The literature search was conducted using various databases MedLine through PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science Core Collection, and EMBASE. A search was also carried out in the grey literature. The search terms used were \"Orthodontic Anchorage Procedures,\" \"mini-implant,\" \"Mini Dental Implant,\" \"Miniscrew,\" and \"microimplant.\" Cochrane risk of bias tools was used to assess the quality of included studies. Patients tend to overestimate the pain inherent in this procedure. The insertion of micro implants is more accepted than the tooth extraction procedure, with less postoperative pain reported. The location, surgical technique, and type of anaesthesia used in the placement of miniscrews influence levels of discomfort. Additionally, the execution of a good surgical technique and the clinician's communication skills are factors that influence patient satisfaction and positive perception. The most frequent outcome reported is pain and discomfort, which varies depending on its location (less with mini interradicular screws than with extra-alveolar screws). Most patients are satisfied or very satisfied with this application.</p>","PeriodicalId":19652,"journal":{"name":"Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient's Perspective on Miniscrews During Orthodontic Treatment-A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Francisco Vale, Raquel Travassos, Isabela Couto, Madalena Ribeiro, Filipa Marques, Francisco Caramelo, Carlos Miguel Marto, Gianrico Spagnuolo, Anabela Baptista Paula, Catarina Nunes, Inês Francisco\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ocr.12864\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>During orthodontic treatment, undesirable reciprocal forces are generated during tooth movement, which explains the use of anchorage strategies to minimise their harmful effects through intra and/or extraoral appliances. Miniscrews are intraoral devices used for temporary skeletal anchorage. Miniscrews are small-sized intraoral devices used for temporary skeletal anchorage and are easy to place and remove. However, some studies refer to adverse effects such as inflammation, pain, and discomfort. This systematic review aims to synthesise the available evidence on the use of miniscrews during orthodontic treatment from the patient's perspective. The literature search was conducted using various databases MedLine through PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science Core Collection, and EMBASE. A search was also carried out in the grey literature. The search terms used were \\\"Orthodontic Anchorage Procedures,\\\" \\\"mini-implant,\\\" \\\"Mini Dental Implant,\\\" \\\"Miniscrew,\\\" and \\\"microimplant.\\\" Cochrane risk of bias tools was used to assess the quality of included studies. Patients tend to overestimate the pain inherent in this procedure. The insertion of micro implants is more accepted than the tooth extraction procedure, with less postoperative pain reported. The location, surgical technique, and type of anaesthesia used in the placement of miniscrews influence levels of discomfort. Additionally, the execution of a good surgical technique and the clinician's communication skills are factors that influence patient satisfaction and positive perception. The most frequent outcome reported is pain and discomfort, which varies depending on its location (less with mini interradicular screws than with extra-alveolar screws). Most patients are satisfied or very satisfied with this application.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19652,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/ocr.12864\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ocr.12864","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在正畸治疗过程中,牙齿移动时会产生不良的往复力,因此需要使用锚定策略,通过口内和/或口外装置将其有害影响降至最低。微型螺丝是用于临时骨骼固定的口内装置。微型螺钉是用于临时骨骼固定的小型口内装置,易于安装和拆除。然而,一些研究提到了不良反应,如发炎、疼痛和不适。本系统性综述旨在从患者的角度综合现有的关于在正畸治疗过程中使用微型螺丝的证据。文献检索使用的数据库包括 MedLine、PubMed、Cochrane Library、Web of Science Core Collection 和 EMBASE。此外,还对灰色文献进行了搜索。使用的检索词包括 "正畸固定程序"、"微型种植体"、"微型牙科种植体"、"微型螺钉 "和 "微型种植体"。科克伦偏倚风险工具用于评估纳入研究的质量。患者往往会高估这一过程中固有的疼痛。与拔牙相比,植入微型种植体更容易被接受,术后疼痛也更少。植入微型螺丝的位置、手术技术和麻醉类型会影响不适程度。此外,良好手术技术的实施和临床医生的沟通技巧也是影响患者满意度和积极感受的因素。最常报告的结果是疼痛和不适,疼痛和不适的程度因位置而异(微型关节间螺钉的疼痛和不适程度低于牙槽外螺钉)。大多数患者对这种应用感到满意或非常满意。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Patient's Perspective on Miniscrews During Orthodontic Treatment-A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis.

During orthodontic treatment, undesirable reciprocal forces are generated during tooth movement, which explains the use of anchorage strategies to minimise their harmful effects through intra and/or extraoral appliances. Miniscrews are intraoral devices used for temporary skeletal anchorage. Miniscrews are small-sized intraoral devices used for temporary skeletal anchorage and are easy to place and remove. However, some studies refer to adverse effects such as inflammation, pain, and discomfort. This systematic review aims to synthesise the available evidence on the use of miniscrews during orthodontic treatment from the patient's perspective. The literature search was conducted using various databases MedLine through PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science Core Collection, and EMBASE. A search was also carried out in the grey literature. The search terms used were "Orthodontic Anchorage Procedures," "mini-implant," "Mini Dental Implant," "Miniscrew," and "microimplant." Cochrane risk of bias tools was used to assess the quality of included studies. Patients tend to overestimate the pain inherent in this procedure. The insertion of micro implants is more accepted than the tooth extraction procedure, with less postoperative pain reported. The location, surgical technique, and type of anaesthesia used in the placement of miniscrews influence levels of discomfort. Additionally, the execution of a good surgical technique and the clinician's communication skills are factors that influence patient satisfaction and positive perception. The most frequent outcome reported is pain and discomfort, which varies depending on its location (less with mini interradicular screws than with extra-alveolar screws). Most patients are satisfied or very satisfied with this application.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research
Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
65
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research - Genes, Growth and Development is published to serve its readers as an international forum for the presentation and critical discussion of issues pertinent to the advancement of the specialty of orthodontics and the evidence-based knowledge of craniofacial growth and development. This forum is based on scientifically supported information, but also includes minority and conflicting opinions. The objective of the journal is to facilitate effective communication between the research community and practicing clinicians. Original papers of high scientific quality that report the findings of clinical trials, clinical epidemiology, and novel therapeutic or diagnostic approaches are appropriate submissions. Similarly, we welcome papers in genetics, developmental biology, syndromology, surgery, speech and hearing, and other biomedical disciplines related to clinical orthodontics and normal and abnormal craniofacial growth and development. In addition to original and basic research, the journal publishes concise reviews, case reports of substantial value, invited essays, letters, and announcements. The journal is published quarterly. The review of submitted papers will be coordinated by the editor and members of the editorial board. It is policy to review manuscripts within 3 to 4 weeks of receipt and to publish within 3 to 6 months of acceptance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信