通过视频评估原版和修订版多伦多西方痉挛性皮肌痉挛评定量表的严重程度分量表的跨学科共识:评分者间可靠性研究

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Shimelis Girma Kassaye, Joke De Pauw, Ségolène De Waele, Willem De Hertogh, Esayas Kebede Gudina, David Crosiers
{"title":"通过视频评估原版和修订版多伦多西方痉挛性皮肌痉挛评定量表的严重程度分量表的跨学科共识:评分者间可靠性研究","authors":"Shimelis Girma Kassaye, Joke De Pauw, Ségolène De Waele, Willem De Hertogh, Esayas Kebede Gudina, David Crosiers","doi":"10.1002/mdc3.14222","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) is widely employed for cervical dystonia (CD) evaluation.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the inter-rater reliability of the severity subscale of the original and revised TWSTRS using video recordings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three raters, a PhD student with a nursing degree, a physiotherapist specialized in CD, and a neurologist-in-training independently rated all videos. The inter-rater reliability was assessed with the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The total severity score of both tools demonstrated a good inter-rater reliability (ICC = 0.87 to 0.88). The inter-rater reliability of individual sub-items varied from poor (ICC = 0.29) to excellent (ICC = 0.9).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The total severity score of both TWSTRS showed good inter-rater reliability in a multidisciplinary team, indicating their applicability for online patients' assessment. We recommend using the total subscale for outcome comparison. Furthermore, there is a need for more accurate definitions of duration factor and shoulder elevation.</p>","PeriodicalId":19029,"journal":{"name":"Movement Disorders Clinical Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interdisciplinary Consensus in Evaluating the Severity Subscale of the Original and Revised Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale Through Video-Based Assessment: An Inter-Rater Reliability Study.\",\"authors\":\"Shimelis Girma Kassaye, Joke De Pauw, Ségolène De Waele, Willem De Hertogh, Esayas Kebede Gudina, David Crosiers\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/mdc3.14222\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) is widely employed for cervical dystonia (CD) evaluation.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the inter-rater reliability of the severity subscale of the original and revised TWSTRS using video recordings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three raters, a PhD student with a nursing degree, a physiotherapist specialized in CD, and a neurologist-in-training independently rated all videos. The inter-rater reliability was assessed with the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The total severity score of both tools demonstrated a good inter-rater reliability (ICC = 0.87 to 0.88). The inter-rater reliability of individual sub-items varied from poor (ICC = 0.29) to excellent (ICC = 0.9).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The total severity score of both TWSTRS showed good inter-rater reliability in a multidisciplinary team, indicating their applicability for online patients' assessment. We recommend using the total subscale for outcome comparison. Furthermore, there is a need for more accurate definitions of duration factor and shoulder elevation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19029,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Movement Disorders Clinical Practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Movement Disorders Clinical Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/mdc3.14222\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Movement Disorders Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/mdc3.14222","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:多伦多西方痉挛性肌张力障碍评定量表(TWSTRS)被广泛用于颈肌张力障碍(CD)的评估:使用视频记录评估原版和修订版多伦多西方痉挛性颈肌张力障碍评定量表严重程度分量表的评分者间可靠性:方法:由三名评分者(一名护理专业博士生、一名 CD 专业物理治疗师和一名神经科实习医生)对所有视频进行独立评分。结果:两个工具的严重程度总分均为 0.5 分,而两个工具的严重程度总分均为 0.5 分:结果:两种工具的严重程度总分均显示出良好的评分者间可靠性(ICC = 0.87 至 0.88)。单个子项目的评分者间可靠性从较差(ICC = 0.29)到极佳(ICC = 0.9)不等:结论:两个 TWSTRS 的严重程度总分在多学科团队中均显示出良好的评分者间可靠性,表明它们适用于在线患者评估。我们建议使用总分量表进行结果比较。此外,还需要对持续时间因素和肩部抬高进行更准确的定义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Interdisciplinary Consensus in Evaluating the Severity Subscale of the Original and Revised Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale Through Video-Based Assessment: An Inter-Rater Reliability Study.

Background: Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) is widely employed for cervical dystonia (CD) evaluation.

Objective: To assess the inter-rater reliability of the severity subscale of the original and revised TWSTRS using video recordings.

Methods: Three raters, a PhD student with a nursing degree, a physiotherapist specialized in CD, and a neurologist-in-training independently rated all videos. The inter-rater reliability was assessed with the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC).

Results: The total severity score of both tools demonstrated a good inter-rater reliability (ICC = 0.87 to 0.88). The inter-rater reliability of individual sub-items varied from poor (ICC = 0.29) to excellent (ICC = 0.9).

Conclusions: The total severity score of both TWSTRS showed good inter-rater reliability in a multidisciplinary team, indicating their applicability for online patients' assessment. We recommend using the total subscale for outcome comparison. Furthermore, there is a need for more accurate definitions of duration factor and shoulder elevation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
7.50%
发文量
218
期刊介绍: Movement Disorders Clinical Practice- is an online-only journal committed to publishing high quality peer reviewed articles related to clinical aspects of movement disorders which broadly include phenomenology (interesting case/case series/rarities), investigative (for e.g- genetics, imaging), translational (phenotype-genotype or other) and treatment aspects (clinical guidelines, diagnostic and treatment algorithms)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信