有可能发现产后死胎风险较高的妇女吗?一项基于地区的前瞻性队列研究。

IF 1.6 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Gloria Guariglia, Cristina Salerno, Beatrice Melis, Martina Benuzzi, Daniela Menichini, Enrica Perrone, Fabio Facchinetti, Antonio La Marca, Isabella Neri, Francesca Monari
{"title":"有可能发现产后死胎风险较高的妇女吗?一项基于地区的前瞻性队列研究。","authors":"Gloria Guariglia, Cristina Salerno, Beatrice Melis, Martina Benuzzi, Daniela Menichini, Enrica Perrone, Fabio Facchinetti, Antonio La Marca, Isabella Neri, Francesca Monari","doi":"10.23736/S2724-606X.24.05580-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of the study is to perform an overview of intrapartum stillbirth (SB) at term, assessing risk factors, causes of death and quality of pregnancy care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is an area-based, prospective cohort study on pregnant women at ≥37 weeks from 2014 to 2021. We compared intrapartum SB' information to alive birth and to antepartum deaths of the same period. Results of logistic regression are reported as the Odds Ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (95% CI) and the P value. A descriptive analysis about the causes of death and quality of pregnancy care is performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall rate of SB at term in Emilia-Romagna was 1.06 ‰ births. Among the 260 cases, 27 (10.4%) occurred during labor, with an intrapartum SB rate of 0.11‰. This SB rate was stable during years. SGA newborn (P=0.005, 95% CI 1.47-9.04, OR 3.63), low level of education (P<0.0001, 95% CI 2.98-16.11, OR 6.93), pre pregnancy BMI ≥ 25 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (P<0.0001, 95% CI 6.61-31.74, OR 14.50) are independent risk factors for intrapartum SB when compared to alive newborns. Compared with antepartum SB, excessive weight gain in pregnancy (RR 2.91, 1.43-3.98, P=0.001) represents a risk factor for intrapartum ones.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Preventing intrapartum SB at term in developed country should be based on both the appropriate antenatal management of fetal growth and the avoidance of maternal excessive weight gain. An effort toward pre conceptional intervention of improving maternal shape could be of value.</p>","PeriodicalId":18572,"journal":{"name":"Minerva obstetrics and gynecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is it possible to detect women at higher risk of intrapartum stillbirth? An area-based prospective cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Gloria Guariglia, Cristina Salerno, Beatrice Melis, Martina Benuzzi, Daniela Menichini, Enrica Perrone, Fabio Facchinetti, Antonio La Marca, Isabella Neri, Francesca Monari\",\"doi\":\"10.23736/S2724-606X.24.05580-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of the study is to perform an overview of intrapartum stillbirth (SB) at term, assessing risk factors, causes of death and quality of pregnancy care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is an area-based, prospective cohort study on pregnant women at ≥37 weeks from 2014 to 2021. We compared intrapartum SB' information to alive birth and to antepartum deaths of the same period. Results of logistic regression are reported as the Odds Ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (95% CI) and the P value. A descriptive analysis about the causes of death and quality of pregnancy care is performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall rate of SB at term in Emilia-Romagna was 1.06 ‰ births. Among the 260 cases, 27 (10.4%) occurred during labor, with an intrapartum SB rate of 0.11‰. This SB rate was stable during years. SGA newborn (P=0.005, 95% CI 1.47-9.04, OR 3.63), low level of education (P<0.0001, 95% CI 2.98-16.11, OR 6.93), pre pregnancy BMI ≥ 25 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (P<0.0001, 95% CI 6.61-31.74, OR 14.50) are independent risk factors for intrapartum SB when compared to alive newborns. Compared with antepartum SB, excessive weight gain in pregnancy (RR 2.91, 1.43-3.98, P=0.001) represents a risk factor for intrapartum ones.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Preventing intrapartum SB at term in developed country should be based on both the appropriate antenatal management of fetal growth and the avoidance of maternal excessive weight gain. An effort toward pre conceptional intervention of improving maternal shape could be of value.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18572,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Minerva obstetrics and gynecology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Minerva obstetrics and gynecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-606X.24.05580-5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva obstetrics and gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-606X.24.05580-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究旨在对临产死胎(SB)进行概述,评估其风险因素、死亡原因和孕期护理质量:本研究的目的是对临产死胎(SB)进行概述,评估风险因素、死亡原因和孕期保健质量:这是一项基于地区的前瞻性队列研究,研究对象为 2014 年至 2021 年怀孕≥37 周的孕妇。我们将产前 SB 的信息与同期的活产和产前死亡进行了比较。逻辑回归的结果以比例比(OR)、95% 置信区间(95% CI)和 P 值的形式报告。对死亡原因和孕期保健质量进行了描述性分析:结果:艾米利亚-罗马涅大区的临产 SB 总发生率为 1.06 ‰。在 260 例中,27 例(10.4%)发生在分娩过程中,产中 SB 率为 0.11‰。这一 SB 率在数年内保持稳定。SGA新生儿(P=0.005,95% CI 1.47-9.04,OR 3.63)、低教育水平(P2(PConclusions:在发达国家,预防临产 SB 应从产前适当管理胎儿生长和避免产妇体重增加过多两方面着手。为改善产妇体形而进行的孕前干预可能具有重要价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Is it possible to detect women at higher risk of intrapartum stillbirth? An area-based prospective cohort study.

Background: The aim of the study is to perform an overview of intrapartum stillbirth (SB) at term, assessing risk factors, causes of death and quality of pregnancy care.

Methods: This is an area-based, prospective cohort study on pregnant women at ≥37 weeks from 2014 to 2021. We compared intrapartum SB' information to alive birth and to antepartum deaths of the same period. Results of logistic regression are reported as the Odds Ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (95% CI) and the P value. A descriptive analysis about the causes of death and quality of pregnancy care is performed.

Results: The overall rate of SB at term in Emilia-Romagna was 1.06 ‰ births. Among the 260 cases, 27 (10.4%) occurred during labor, with an intrapartum SB rate of 0.11‰. This SB rate was stable during years. SGA newborn (P=0.005, 95% CI 1.47-9.04, OR 3.63), low level of education (P<0.0001, 95% CI 2.98-16.11, OR 6.93), pre pregnancy BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 (P<0.0001, 95% CI 6.61-31.74, OR 14.50) are independent risk factors for intrapartum SB when compared to alive newborns. Compared with antepartum SB, excessive weight gain in pregnancy (RR 2.91, 1.43-3.98, P=0.001) represents a risk factor for intrapartum ones.

Conclusions: Preventing intrapartum SB at term in developed country should be based on both the appropriate antenatal management of fetal growth and the avoidance of maternal excessive weight gain. An effort toward pre conceptional intervention of improving maternal shape could be of value.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Minerva obstetrics and gynecology
Minerva obstetrics and gynecology OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
191
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信