利用盲源分离自动提取心脏运动的自门控自由运行 5D 全心磁共振成像。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-09 DOI:10.1002/mrm.30322
Isabel Montón Quesada, Augustin C Ogier, Masaki Ishida, Masafumi Takafuji, Haruno Ito, Hajime Sakuma, Ludovica Romanin, Christopher W Roy, Milan Prša, Jonas Richiardi, Jérôme Yerly, Matthias Stuber, Ruud B van Heeswijk
{"title":"利用盲源分离自动提取心脏运动的自门控自由运行 5D 全心磁共振成像。","authors":"Isabel Montón Quesada, Augustin C Ogier, Masaki Ishida, Masafumi Takafuji, Haruno Ito, Hajime Sakuma, Ludovica Romanin, Christopher W Roy, Milan Prša, Jonas Richiardi, Jérôme Yerly, Matthias Stuber, Ruud B van Heeswijk","doi":"10.1002/mrm.30322","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare two blind source separation (BSS) techniques to principal component analysis and the electrocardiogram for the identification of cardiac triggers in self-gated free-running 5D whole-heart MRI. To ascertain the precision and robustness of the techniques, they were compared in three different noise and contrast regimes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The repeated superior-inferior (SI) projections of a 3D radial trajectory were used to extract the physiological signals in three cardiac MRI cohorts: (1) 9 healthy volunteers without contrast agent injection at 1.5T, (2) 30 ferumoxytol-injected congenital heart disease patients at 1.5T, and (3) 12 gadobutrol-injected patients with suspected coronary artery disease at 3T. Self-gated cardiac triggers were extracted with the three algorithms (principal component analysis [PCA], second-order blind identification [SOBI], and independent component analysis [ICA]) and the difference with the electrocardiogram triggers was calculated. PCA and SOBI triggers were retained for image reconstruction. The image sharpness was ascertained on whole-heart 5D images obtained with PCA and SOBI and compared among the three cohorts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>SOBI resulted in smaller trigger differences in Cohorts 1 and 3 compared to PCA (p < 0.01) and in all cohorts compared to ICA (p < 0.04). In Cohorts 1 and 3, the sharpness increased significantly in the reconstructed images when using SOBI instead of PCA (p < 0.03), but not in Cohort 2 (p = 0.4).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We have shown that SOBI results in more precisely extracted self-gated triggers than PCA and ICA. The validation across three diverse cohorts demonstrates the robustness of the method against acquisition variability.</p>","PeriodicalId":18065,"journal":{"name":"Magnetic Resonance in Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"961-974"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11680725/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Self-gated free-running 5D whole-heart MRI using blind source separation for automated cardiac motion extraction.\",\"authors\":\"Isabel Montón Quesada, Augustin C Ogier, Masaki Ishida, Masafumi Takafuji, Haruno Ito, Hajime Sakuma, Ludovica Romanin, Christopher W Roy, Milan Prša, Jonas Richiardi, Jérôme Yerly, Matthias Stuber, Ruud B van Heeswijk\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/mrm.30322\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare two blind source separation (BSS) techniques to principal component analysis and the electrocardiogram for the identification of cardiac triggers in self-gated free-running 5D whole-heart MRI. To ascertain the precision and robustness of the techniques, they were compared in three different noise and contrast regimes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The repeated superior-inferior (SI) projections of a 3D radial trajectory were used to extract the physiological signals in three cardiac MRI cohorts: (1) 9 healthy volunteers without contrast agent injection at 1.5T, (2) 30 ferumoxytol-injected congenital heart disease patients at 1.5T, and (3) 12 gadobutrol-injected patients with suspected coronary artery disease at 3T. Self-gated cardiac triggers were extracted with the three algorithms (principal component analysis [PCA], second-order blind identification [SOBI], and independent component analysis [ICA]) and the difference with the electrocardiogram triggers was calculated. PCA and SOBI triggers were retained for image reconstruction. The image sharpness was ascertained on whole-heart 5D images obtained with PCA and SOBI and compared among the three cohorts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>SOBI resulted in smaller trigger differences in Cohorts 1 and 3 compared to PCA (p < 0.01) and in all cohorts compared to ICA (p < 0.04). In Cohorts 1 and 3, the sharpness increased significantly in the reconstructed images when using SOBI instead of PCA (p < 0.03), but not in Cohort 2 (p = 0.4).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We have shown that SOBI results in more precisely extracted self-gated triggers than PCA and ICA. The validation across three diverse cohorts demonstrates the robustness of the method against acquisition variability.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18065,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Magnetic Resonance in Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"961-974\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11680725/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Magnetic Resonance in Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.30322\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Magnetic Resonance in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.30322","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较两种盲源分离(BSS)技术与主成分分析和心电图,以识别自门控自由运行 5D 全心磁共振成像中的心脏触发器。为了确定这些技术的精确性和稳健性,在三种不同的噪声和对比度条件下对它们进行了比较:方法:使用三维径向轨迹的重复上-下(SI)投影提取三组心脏磁共振成像中的生理信号:(1)在 1.5T 下,9 名未注射造影剂的健康志愿者;(2)在 1.5T 下,30 名注射阿魏酸的先天性心脏病患者;(3)在 3T 下,12 名注射钆布醇的疑似冠心病患者。使用三种算法(主成分分析法[PCA]、二阶盲识别法[SOBI]和独立成分分析法[ICA])提取自门控心脏触发器,并计算与心电图触发器的差异。PCA 和 SOBI 触发器被保留用于图像重建。用 PCA 和 SOBI 获得的全心 5D 图像确定了图像的清晰度,并对三个组群进行了比较:结果:与 PCA 相比,SOBI 在队列 1 和队列 3 中产生的触发器差异较小(p 结论:SOBI 在队列 1 和队列 3 中产生的触发器差异较小:我们已经证明,与 PCA 和 ICA 相比,SOBI 能够更精确地提取自门控触发器。在三个不同组群中进行的验证表明,该方法对采集变异具有稳健性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Self-gated free-running 5D whole-heart MRI using blind source separation for automated cardiac motion extraction.

Purpose: To compare two blind source separation (BSS) techniques to principal component analysis and the electrocardiogram for the identification of cardiac triggers in self-gated free-running 5D whole-heart MRI. To ascertain the precision and robustness of the techniques, they were compared in three different noise and contrast regimes.

Methods: The repeated superior-inferior (SI) projections of a 3D radial trajectory were used to extract the physiological signals in three cardiac MRI cohorts: (1) 9 healthy volunteers without contrast agent injection at 1.5T, (2) 30 ferumoxytol-injected congenital heart disease patients at 1.5T, and (3) 12 gadobutrol-injected patients with suspected coronary artery disease at 3T. Self-gated cardiac triggers were extracted with the three algorithms (principal component analysis [PCA], second-order blind identification [SOBI], and independent component analysis [ICA]) and the difference with the electrocardiogram triggers was calculated. PCA and SOBI triggers were retained for image reconstruction. The image sharpness was ascertained on whole-heart 5D images obtained with PCA and SOBI and compared among the three cohorts.

Results: SOBI resulted in smaller trigger differences in Cohorts 1 and 3 compared to PCA (p < 0.01) and in all cohorts compared to ICA (p < 0.04). In Cohorts 1 and 3, the sharpness increased significantly in the reconstructed images when using SOBI instead of PCA (p < 0.03), but not in Cohort 2 (p = 0.4).

Conclusion: We have shown that SOBI results in more precisely extracted self-gated triggers than PCA and ICA. The validation across three diverse cohorts demonstrates the robustness of the method against acquisition variability.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
24.20%
发文量
376
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Magnetic Resonance in Medicine (Magn Reson Med) is an international journal devoted to the publication of original investigations concerned with all aspects of the development and use of nuclear magnetic resonance and electron paramagnetic resonance techniques for medical applications. Reports of original investigations in the areas of mathematics, computing, engineering, physics, biophysics, chemistry, biochemistry, and physiology directly relevant to magnetic resonance will be accepted, as well as methodology-oriented clinical studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信