在一家安全网医院进行靶向肌肉神经再支配术后的手术并发症。

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Chioma G Obinero, Jackson C Green, Kylie R Swiekatowski, Chimdindu V Obinero, Arvind Manisundaram, Matthew R Greives, Mohin Bhadkamkar, Yuewei Wu-Fienberg, Erik Marques
{"title":"在一家安全网医院进行靶向肌肉神经再支配术后的手术并发症。","authors":"Chioma G Obinero, Jackson C Green, Kylie R Swiekatowski, Chimdindu V Obinero, Arvind Manisundaram, Matthew R Greives, Mohin Bhadkamkar, Yuewei Wu-Fienberg, Erik Marques","doi":"10.1055/a-2435-7410","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong> Targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) and regenerative peripheral nerve interface (RPNI) can reduce neuroma formation and phantom limb pain (PLP) after lower extremity (LE) amputation. These techniques have not been studied in safety-net hospitals. This study aims to examine the surgical complication rates after TMR and/or RPNI at an academic safety-net hospital in an urban setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> This was a retrospective review of patients older than 18 years who had prior above-knee guillotine amputation (AKA) or below-knee guillotine amputation (BKA) and underwent stump formalization with TMR and/or RPNI from 2020 to 2022. Demographics, medical history, and operative and postoperative characteristics were collected. The primary outcome was any surgical complication, defined as infection, dehiscence, hematoma, neuroma, or reoperation. Univariate analysis was conducted to identify variables associated with surgical complications and PLP.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> Thirty-two patients met the inclusion criteria. The median age was 52 years, and 75% were males. Indications for amputation included diabetic foot infection (71.9%), necrotizing soft tissue infection (25.0%), and malignancy (3.1%). BKA was the most common indication for formalization (93.8%). Most patients (56.3%) had formalization with TMR and RPNI, 34.4% patients had TMR only, and 9.4% had RPNI alone. The incidence of postoperative complications was 46.9%, with infection being the most common (31.3%). The median follow-up time was 107.5 days. There was no significant difference in demographics, medical history, or operative characteristics between patients who did and did not have surgical complications. However, there was a trend toward higher rates of PLP in patients who had a postoperative wound infection (<i>p</i> = 0.06).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> Overall complication rates after LE formalization with TMR and/or RPNI at our academic safety-net hospital were consistent with reported literature. Given the benefits, including reduced chronic pain and lower health care costs, we advocate for the wider adoption of these techniques at other safety-net hospitals.</p>","PeriodicalId":16949,"journal":{"name":"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Surgical Complications after Targeted Muscle Reinnervation at a Safety-Net Hospital.\",\"authors\":\"Chioma G Obinero, Jackson C Green, Kylie R Swiekatowski, Chimdindu V Obinero, Arvind Manisundaram, Matthew R Greives, Mohin Bhadkamkar, Yuewei Wu-Fienberg, Erik Marques\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2435-7410\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong> Targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) and regenerative peripheral nerve interface (RPNI) can reduce neuroma formation and phantom limb pain (PLP) after lower extremity (LE) amputation. These techniques have not been studied in safety-net hospitals. This study aims to examine the surgical complication rates after TMR and/or RPNI at an academic safety-net hospital in an urban setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> This was a retrospective review of patients older than 18 years who had prior above-knee guillotine amputation (AKA) or below-knee guillotine amputation (BKA) and underwent stump formalization with TMR and/or RPNI from 2020 to 2022. Demographics, medical history, and operative and postoperative characteristics were collected. The primary outcome was any surgical complication, defined as infection, dehiscence, hematoma, neuroma, or reoperation. Univariate analysis was conducted to identify variables associated with surgical complications and PLP.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> Thirty-two patients met the inclusion criteria. The median age was 52 years, and 75% were males. Indications for amputation included diabetic foot infection (71.9%), necrotizing soft tissue infection (25.0%), and malignancy (3.1%). BKA was the most common indication for formalization (93.8%). Most patients (56.3%) had formalization with TMR and RPNI, 34.4% patients had TMR only, and 9.4% had RPNI alone. The incidence of postoperative complications was 46.9%, with infection being the most common (31.3%). The median follow-up time was 107.5 days. There was no significant difference in demographics, medical history, or operative characteristics between patients who did and did not have surgical complications. However, there was a trend toward higher rates of PLP in patients who had a postoperative wound infection (<i>p</i> = 0.06).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> Overall complication rates after LE formalization with TMR and/or RPNI at our academic safety-net hospital were consistent with reported literature. Given the benefits, including reduced chronic pain and lower health care costs, we advocate for the wider adoption of these techniques at other safety-net hospitals.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16949,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2435-7410\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2435-7410","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景有针对性的肌肉神经再支配(TMR)和再生周围神经接口(RPNI)可以减少下肢(LE)截肢后神经瘤的形成和幻肢痛(PLP)的发生率。然而,这些技术尚未针对安全网医院的患者进行过研究。本研究的目的是检查安全网医院 TMR 和/或 RPNI 术后的手术并发症发生率。方法 这是一项回顾性研究,研究对象是 2020 年至 2022 年期间年龄大于 18 岁、曾接受过膝上(AKA)或膝下(BKA)铡刀截肢手术并通过 TMR 和/或 RPNI 进行残端正规化的患者。研究人员收集了人口统计学、病史、手术和术后特征。主要结果是任何手术并发症,即感染、开裂、血肿、神经瘤或再次手术。进行单变量分析以确定与手术并发症和 PLP 相关的变量。结果 32名患者符合纳入标准。中位年龄为 52 岁,75% 为男性。BKA 是最常见的正式手术指征(93.8%)。大多数患者(56.3%)接受了TMR和RPNI手术,34.4%的患者仅接受了TMR手术,9.4%的患者仅接受了RPNI手术。术后并发症的发生率为 46.9%,其中最常见的是感染(31.3%)。出现和未出现手术并发症的患者在人口统计学、病史或手术特征方面没有明显差异。然而,术后伤口感染的患者发生 PLP 的几率有升高的趋势(几率比 6.2,95% CI 0.70-84.6,P = 0.06)。结论 在我们的安全网医院,使用 TMR 和/或 RPNI 进行 LE 正规化术后的总体并发症发生率与文献报道相似。鉴于这些手术技术的益处,包括减少慢性疼痛和降低医疗成本,我们认为这些技术应在其他安全网医院广泛采用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Surgical Complications after Targeted Muscle Reinnervation at a Safety-Net Hospital.

Background:  Targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) and regenerative peripheral nerve interface (RPNI) can reduce neuroma formation and phantom limb pain (PLP) after lower extremity (LE) amputation. These techniques have not been studied in safety-net hospitals. This study aims to examine the surgical complication rates after TMR and/or RPNI at an academic safety-net hospital in an urban setting.

Methods:  This was a retrospective review of patients older than 18 years who had prior above-knee guillotine amputation (AKA) or below-knee guillotine amputation (BKA) and underwent stump formalization with TMR and/or RPNI from 2020 to 2022. Demographics, medical history, and operative and postoperative characteristics were collected. The primary outcome was any surgical complication, defined as infection, dehiscence, hematoma, neuroma, or reoperation. Univariate analysis was conducted to identify variables associated with surgical complications and PLP.

Results:  Thirty-two patients met the inclusion criteria. The median age was 52 years, and 75% were males. Indications for amputation included diabetic foot infection (71.9%), necrotizing soft tissue infection (25.0%), and malignancy (3.1%). BKA was the most common indication for formalization (93.8%). Most patients (56.3%) had formalization with TMR and RPNI, 34.4% patients had TMR only, and 9.4% had RPNI alone. The incidence of postoperative complications was 46.9%, with infection being the most common (31.3%). The median follow-up time was 107.5 days. There was no significant difference in demographics, medical history, or operative characteristics between patients who did and did not have surgical complications. However, there was a trend toward higher rates of PLP in patients who had a postoperative wound infection (p = 0.06).

Conclusion:  Overall complication rates after LE formalization with TMR and/or RPNI at our academic safety-net hospital were consistent with reported literature. Given the benefits, including reduced chronic pain and lower health care costs, we advocate for the wider adoption of these techniques at other safety-net hospitals.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
28.60%
发文量
80
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery is a peer-reviewed, indexed journal that provides an international forum for the publication of articles focusing on reconstructive microsurgery and complex reconstructive surgery. The journal was originally established in 1984 for the microsurgical community to publish and share academic papers. The Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery provides the latest in original research spanning basic laboratory, translational, and clinical investigations. Review papers cover current topics in complex reconstruction and microsurgery. In addition, special sections discuss new technologies, innovations, materials, and significant problem cases. The journal welcomes controversial topics, editorial comments, book reviews, and letters to the Editor, in order to complete the balanced spectrum of information available in the Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery. All articles undergo stringent peer review by international experts in the specialty.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信