Stephen E. Edache , Vanessa Horton , Diana M. Dewsbury , Leigh Ann George , Xiaorong Shi , T.G. Nagaraja , Sherri Trujillo , Ryan Algino , Tom S. Edrington , David G. Renter , Natalia Cernicchiaro
{"title":"评估后益生菌对宰杀奶牛髂下淋巴结中肠炎沙门氏菌流行率、血清型多样性和抗菌药耐药性的影响。","authors":"Stephen E. Edache , Vanessa Horton , Diana M. Dewsbury , Leigh Ann George , Xiaorong Shi , T.G. Nagaraja , Sherri Trujillo , Ryan Algino , Tom S. Edrington , David G. Renter , Natalia Cernicchiaro","doi":"10.1016/j.jfp.2024.100375","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study aimed to determine whether the farm-level use of a <em>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</em>-based postbiotic was associated with <em>Salmonella</em> prevalence and concentration, serotype diversity, and antimicrobial resistance in the subiliac lymph nodes (LN) of cull dairy cows. In collaboration with two commercial processing plants in the Southwestern (SW) and Northeastern (NE) regions of the U.S., cull dairy cattle lots processed in the same week from dairy farms that fed or not the postbiotic were sampled. Up to 20 LN were collected from dairy cattle from each supplier farm at least once every season. Samples were analyzed for <em>Salmonella</em> by culture and quantitative PCR methods, and isolates were subjected to serotype identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Although a numerically lower prevalence was observed, the preharvest administration of the postbiotic was not significantly associated with <em>Salmonella</em> prevalence in cull dairy cattle. However, <em>Salmonella</em> prevalence significantly varied by region; the SW region showed a higher prevalence than the NE region. Whereas dominant <em>Salmonella</em> serotypes included Montevideo, Mbandaka, Muenster, Cerro, Meleagridis, and Anatum, the probability of isolating a dominant serotype did not significantly vary by feed additive status (FAS) or region, but varied by season. Up to 34 isolates (out of 391) exhibited resistance to each antimicrobial, with the highest number of isolates exhibiting resistance to streptomycin and ciprofloxacin; however, this did not significantly vary by FAS, season, or region. The precise reasons for the lack of effectiveness of the postbiotic in reducing <em>Salmonella</em> burden are unknown; however, varied administration durations of the postbiotic due to culling at different lactation cycle stages or during dry periods may have hindered its impact, especially if dairy cows were culled early. Other factors may include dietary components, farm management practices, and external environmental influences.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15903,"journal":{"name":"Journal of food protection","volume":"87 12","pages":"Article 100375"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of a Postbiotic on Salmonella enterica Prevalence, Serotype Diversity, and Antimicrobial Resistance in the Subiliac Lymph Nodes of Cull Dairy Cattle\",\"authors\":\"Stephen E. Edache , Vanessa Horton , Diana M. Dewsbury , Leigh Ann George , Xiaorong Shi , T.G. Nagaraja , Sherri Trujillo , Ryan Algino , Tom S. Edrington , David G. Renter , Natalia Cernicchiaro\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jfp.2024.100375\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study aimed to determine whether the farm-level use of a <em>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</em>-based postbiotic was associated with <em>Salmonella</em> prevalence and concentration, serotype diversity, and antimicrobial resistance in the subiliac lymph nodes (LN) of cull dairy cows. In collaboration with two commercial processing plants in the Southwestern (SW) and Northeastern (NE) regions of the U.S., cull dairy cattle lots processed in the same week from dairy farms that fed or not the postbiotic were sampled. Up to 20 LN were collected from dairy cattle from each supplier farm at least once every season. Samples were analyzed for <em>Salmonella</em> by culture and quantitative PCR methods, and isolates were subjected to serotype identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Although a numerically lower prevalence was observed, the preharvest administration of the postbiotic was not significantly associated with <em>Salmonella</em> prevalence in cull dairy cattle. However, <em>Salmonella</em> prevalence significantly varied by region; the SW region showed a higher prevalence than the NE region. Whereas dominant <em>Salmonella</em> serotypes included Montevideo, Mbandaka, Muenster, Cerro, Meleagridis, and Anatum, the probability of isolating a dominant serotype did not significantly vary by feed additive status (FAS) or region, but varied by season. Up to 34 isolates (out of 391) exhibited resistance to each antimicrobial, with the highest number of isolates exhibiting resistance to streptomycin and ciprofloxacin; however, this did not significantly vary by FAS, season, or region. The precise reasons for the lack of effectiveness of the postbiotic in reducing <em>Salmonella</em> burden are unknown; however, varied administration durations of the postbiotic due to culling at different lactation cycle stages or during dry periods may have hindered its impact, especially if dairy cows were culled early. Other factors may include dietary components, farm management practices, and external environmental influences.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15903,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of food protection\",\"volume\":\"87 12\",\"pages\":\"Article 100375\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of food protection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0362028X24001595\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of food protection","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0362028X24001595","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluation of a Postbiotic on Salmonella enterica Prevalence, Serotype Diversity, and Antimicrobial Resistance in the Subiliac Lymph Nodes of Cull Dairy Cattle
This study aimed to determine whether the farm-level use of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae-based postbiotic was associated with Salmonella prevalence and concentration, serotype diversity, and antimicrobial resistance in the subiliac lymph nodes (LN) of cull dairy cows. In collaboration with two commercial processing plants in the Southwestern (SW) and Northeastern (NE) regions of the U.S., cull dairy cattle lots processed in the same week from dairy farms that fed or not the postbiotic were sampled. Up to 20 LN were collected from dairy cattle from each supplier farm at least once every season. Samples were analyzed for Salmonella by culture and quantitative PCR methods, and isolates were subjected to serotype identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Although a numerically lower prevalence was observed, the preharvest administration of the postbiotic was not significantly associated with Salmonella prevalence in cull dairy cattle. However, Salmonella prevalence significantly varied by region; the SW region showed a higher prevalence than the NE region. Whereas dominant Salmonella serotypes included Montevideo, Mbandaka, Muenster, Cerro, Meleagridis, and Anatum, the probability of isolating a dominant serotype did not significantly vary by feed additive status (FAS) or region, but varied by season. Up to 34 isolates (out of 391) exhibited resistance to each antimicrobial, with the highest number of isolates exhibiting resistance to streptomycin and ciprofloxacin; however, this did not significantly vary by FAS, season, or region. The precise reasons for the lack of effectiveness of the postbiotic in reducing Salmonella burden are unknown; however, varied administration durations of the postbiotic due to culling at different lactation cycle stages or during dry periods may have hindered its impact, especially if dairy cows were culled early. Other factors may include dietary components, farm management practices, and external environmental influences.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Food Protection® (JFP) is an international, monthly scientific journal in the English language published by the International Association for Food Protection (IAFP). JFP publishes research and review articles on all aspects of food protection and safety. Major emphases of JFP are placed on studies dealing with:
Tracking, detecting (including traditional, molecular, and real-time), inactivating, and controlling food-related hazards, including microorganisms (including antibiotic resistance), microbial (mycotoxins, seafood toxins) and non-microbial toxins (heavy metals, pesticides, veterinary drug residues, migrants from food packaging, and processing contaminants), allergens and pests (insects, rodents) in human food, pet food and animal feed throughout the food chain;
Microbiological food quality and traditional/novel methods to assay microbiological food quality;
Prevention of food-related hazards and food spoilage through food preservatives and thermal/non-thermal processes, including process validation;
Food fermentations and food-related probiotics;
Safe food handling practices during pre-harvest, harvest, post-harvest, distribution and consumption, including food safety education for retailers, foodservice, and consumers;
Risk assessments for food-related hazards;
Economic impact of food-related hazards, foodborne illness, food loss, food spoilage, and adulterated foods;
Food fraud, food authentication, food defense, and foodborne disease outbreak investigations.