{"title":"儿童烧伤疤痕程序性治疗的系统回顾:根据临床研究评估疗效、安全性、标准方案、平均疗程和耐受性。","authors":"Masoumeh Roohaninasab, Niloufar Najar Nobari, Mohammadreza Ghassemi, Elham Behrangi, Alireza Jafarzadeh, Afsaneh Sadeghzadeh-Bazargan, Azadeh Goodarzi","doi":"10.1111/iwj.70091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Managing burn scars in children presents significant challenges. This study investigates effective treatment methods for burn scars, focusing on efficacy, safety, standard protocols and tolerability. Major databases such as PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science were thoroughly searched up to August 2024, emphasizing procedural treatments for burn scars in children. Key data collected included participant demographics, sample sizes, intervention methods, follow-up protocols, treatment effectiveness and reported adverse events. A total of 256 children were assessed, with all procedural treatments yielding satisfactory outcomes. Among the various methods, trapeze-flap plasty and percutaneous collagen induction showed improvements in all patients. In the laser treatment group, which included 161 children, the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) score reduction ranged from 55.55% to 76.31%, with outcomes rated as good (24.61%) to excellent (60%). Laser treatment using local anaesthesia proved to be well tolerated by children. Our findings indicate that various methods—including trapeze-flap plasty, percutaneous collagen induction, phototherapy and fractional CO<sub>2</sub> laser—demonstrate a relatively good response and an acceptable safety profile. Notably, light-based therapies/lasers may serve as safe, effective and tolerable options for scar treatment in this age group, often eliminating the need for general anaesthesia.</p>","PeriodicalId":14451,"journal":{"name":"International Wound Journal","volume":"21 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11461021/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A systematic review of procedural treatments for burn scars in children: Evaluating efficacy, safety, standard protocols, average sessions and tolerability based on clinical studies\",\"authors\":\"Masoumeh Roohaninasab, Niloufar Najar Nobari, Mohammadreza Ghassemi, Elham Behrangi, Alireza Jafarzadeh, Afsaneh Sadeghzadeh-Bazargan, Azadeh Goodarzi\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/iwj.70091\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Managing burn scars in children presents significant challenges. This study investigates effective treatment methods for burn scars, focusing on efficacy, safety, standard protocols and tolerability. Major databases such as PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science were thoroughly searched up to August 2024, emphasizing procedural treatments for burn scars in children. Key data collected included participant demographics, sample sizes, intervention methods, follow-up protocols, treatment effectiveness and reported adverse events. A total of 256 children were assessed, with all procedural treatments yielding satisfactory outcomes. Among the various methods, trapeze-flap plasty and percutaneous collagen induction showed improvements in all patients. In the laser treatment group, which included 161 children, the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) score reduction ranged from 55.55% to 76.31%, with outcomes rated as good (24.61%) to excellent (60%). Laser treatment using local anaesthesia proved to be well tolerated by children. Our findings indicate that various methods—including trapeze-flap plasty, percutaneous collagen induction, phototherapy and fractional CO<sub>2</sub> laser—demonstrate a relatively good response and an acceptable safety profile. Notably, light-based therapies/lasers may serve as safe, effective and tolerable options for scar treatment in this age group, often eliminating the need for general anaesthesia.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14451,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Wound Journal\",\"volume\":\"21 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11461021/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Wound Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/iwj.70091\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Wound Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/iwj.70091","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
治疗儿童烧伤疤痕是一项重大挑战。本研究调查了烧伤疤痕的有效治疗方法,重点关注疗效、安全性、标准方案和耐受性。截至 2024 年 8 月,本研究对 PubMed、Scopus 和 Web of Science 等主要数据库进行了全面检索,重点关注儿童烧伤疤痕的程序性治疗方法。收集的主要数据包括参与者的人口统计学特征、样本量、干预方法、随访方案、治疗效果和报告的不良事件。共有 256 名儿童接受了评估,所有程序性治疗都取得了令人满意的结果。在各种方法中,梯形瓣成形术和经皮胶原蛋白诱导术对所有患者都有改善。激光治疗组包括161名儿童,其温哥华疤痕量表(VSS)评分降低了55.55%至76.31%,疗效被评为良好(24.61%)至优秀(60%)。事实证明,儿童对使用局部麻醉的激光治疗耐受性良好。我们的研究结果表明,包括梯形瓣成形术、经皮胶原蛋白诱导、光疗和点阵二氧化碳激光在内的各种方法都显示出较好的疗效和可接受的安全性。值得注意的是,基于光的疗法/激光可作为安全、有效和可耐受的疤痕治疗方法,通常无需全身麻醉。
A systematic review of procedural treatments for burn scars in children: Evaluating efficacy, safety, standard protocols, average sessions and tolerability based on clinical studies
Managing burn scars in children presents significant challenges. This study investigates effective treatment methods for burn scars, focusing on efficacy, safety, standard protocols and tolerability. Major databases such as PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science were thoroughly searched up to August 2024, emphasizing procedural treatments for burn scars in children. Key data collected included participant demographics, sample sizes, intervention methods, follow-up protocols, treatment effectiveness and reported adverse events. A total of 256 children were assessed, with all procedural treatments yielding satisfactory outcomes. Among the various methods, trapeze-flap plasty and percutaneous collagen induction showed improvements in all patients. In the laser treatment group, which included 161 children, the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) score reduction ranged from 55.55% to 76.31%, with outcomes rated as good (24.61%) to excellent (60%). Laser treatment using local anaesthesia proved to be well tolerated by children. Our findings indicate that various methods—including trapeze-flap plasty, percutaneous collagen induction, phototherapy and fractional CO2 laser—demonstrate a relatively good response and an acceptable safety profile. Notably, light-based therapies/lasers may serve as safe, effective and tolerable options for scar treatment in this age group, often eliminating the need for general anaesthesia.
期刊介绍:
The Editors welcome papers on all aspects of prevention and treatment of wounds and associated conditions in the fields of surgery, dermatology, oncology, nursing, radiotherapy, physical therapy, occupational therapy and podiatry. The Journal accepts papers in the following categories:
- Research papers
- Review articles
- Clinical studies
- Letters
- News and Views: international perspectives, education initiatives, guidelines and different activities of groups and societies.
Calendar of events
The Editors are supported by a board of international experts and a panel of reviewers across a range of disciplines and specialties which ensures only the most current and relevant research is published.