儿童烧伤疤痕程序性治疗的系统回顾:根据临床研究评估疗效、安全性、标准方案、平均疗程和耐受性。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 DERMATOLOGY
Masoumeh Roohaninasab, Niloufar Najar Nobari, Mohammadreza Ghassemi, Elham Behrangi, Alireza Jafarzadeh, Afsaneh Sadeghzadeh-Bazargan, Azadeh Goodarzi
{"title":"儿童烧伤疤痕程序性治疗的系统回顾:根据临床研究评估疗效、安全性、标准方案、平均疗程和耐受性。","authors":"Masoumeh Roohaninasab,&nbsp;Niloufar Najar Nobari,&nbsp;Mohammadreza Ghassemi,&nbsp;Elham Behrangi,&nbsp;Alireza Jafarzadeh,&nbsp;Afsaneh Sadeghzadeh-Bazargan,&nbsp;Azadeh Goodarzi","doi":"10.1111/iwj.70091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Managing burn scars in children presents significant challenges. This study investigates effective treatment methods for burn scars, focusing on efficacy, safety, standard protocols and tolerability. Major databases such as PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science were thoroughly searched up to August 2024, emphasizing procedural treatments for burn scars in children. Key data collected included participant demographics, sample sizes, intervention methods, follow-up protocols, treatment effectiveness and reported adverse events. A total of 256 children were assessed, with all procedural treatments yielding satisfactory outcomes. Among the various methods, trapeze-flap plasty and percutaneous collagen induction showed improvements in all patients. In the laser treatment group, which included 161 children, the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) score reduction ranged from 55.55% to 76.31%, with outcomes rated as good (24.61%) to excellent (60%). Laser treatment using local anaesthesia proved to be well tolerated by children. Our findings indicate that various methods—including trapeze-flap plasty, percutaneous collagen induction, phototherapy and fractional CO<sub>2</sub> laser—demonstrate a relatively good response and an acceptable safety profile. Notably, light-based therapies/lasers may serve as safe, effective and tolerable options for scar treatment in this age group, often eliminating the need for general anaesthesia.</p>","PeriodicalId":14451,"journal":{"name":"International Wound Journal","volume":"21 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11461021/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A systematic review of procedural treatments for burn scars in children: Evaluating efficacy, safety, standard protocols, average sessions and tolerability based on clinical studies\",\"authors\":\"Masoumeh Roohaninasab,&nbsp;Niloufar Najar Nobari,&nbsp;Mohammadreza Ghassemi,&nbsp;Elham Behrangi,&nbsp;Alireza Jafarzadeh,&nbsp;Afsaneh Sadeghzadeh-Bazargan,&nbsp;Azadeh Goodarzi\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/iwj.70091\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Managing burn scars in children presents significant challenges. This study investigates effective treatment methods for burn scars, focusing on efficacy, safety, standard protocols and tolerability. Major databases such as PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science were thoroughly searched up to August 2024, emphasizing procedural treatments for burn scars in children. Key data collected included participant demographics, sample sizes, intervention methods, follow-up protocols, treatment effectiveness and reported adverse events. A total of 256 children were assessed, with all procedural treatments yielding satisfactory outcomes. Among the various methods, trapeze-flap plasty and percutaneous collagen induction showed improvements in all patients. In the laser treatment group, which included 161 children, the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) score reduction ranged from 55.55% to 76.31%, with outcomes rated as good (24.61%) to excellent (60%). Laser treatment using local anaesthesia proved to be well tolerated by children. Our findings indicate that various methods—including trapeze-flap plasty, percutaneous collagen induction, phototherapy and fractional CO<sub>2</sub> laser—demonstrate a relatively good response and an acceptable safety profile. Notably, light-based therapies/lasers may serve as safe, effective and tolerable options for scar treatment in this age group, often eliminating the need for general anaesthesia.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14451,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Wound Journal\",\"volume\":\"21 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11461021/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Wound Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/iwj.70091\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Wound Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/iwj.70091","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

治疗儿童烧伤疤痕是一项重大挑战。本研究调查了烧伤疤痕的有效治疗方法,重点关注疗效、安全性、标准方案和耐受性。截至 2024 年 8 月,本研究对 PubMed、Scopus 和 Web of Science 等主要数据库进行了全面检索,重点关注儿童烧伤疤痕的程序性治疗方法。收集的主要数据包括参与者的人口统计学特征、样本量、干预方法、随访方案、治疗效果和报告的不良事件。共有 256 名儿童接受了评估,所有程序性治疗都取得了令人满意的结果。在各种方法中,梯形瓣成形术和经皮胶原蛋白诱导术对所有患者都有改善。激光治疗组包括161名儿童,其温哥华疤痕量表(VSS)评分降低了55.55%至76.31%,疗效被评为良好(24.61%)至优秀(60%)。事实证明,儿童对使用局部麻醉的激光治疗耐受性良好。我们的研究结果表明,包括梯形瓣成形术、经皮胶原蛋白诱导、光疗和点阵二氧化碳激光在内的各种方法都显示出较好的疗效和可接受的安全性。值得注意的是,基于光的疗法/激光可作为安全、有效和可耐受的疤痕治疗方法,通常无需全身麻醉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A systematic review of procedural treatments for burn scars in children: Evaluating efficacy, safety, standard protocols, average sessions and tolerability based on clinical studies

Managing burn scars in children presents significant challenges. This study investigates effective treatment methods for burn scars, focusing on efficacy, safety, standard protocols and tolerability. Major databases such as PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science were thoroughly searched up to August 2024, emphasizing procedural treatments for burn scars in children. Key data collected included participant demographics, sample sizes, intervention methods, follow-up protocols, treatment effectiveness and reported adverse events. A total of 256 children were assessed, with all procedural treatments yielding satisfactory outcomes. Among the various methods, trapeze-flap plasty and percutaneous collagen induction showed improvements in all patients. In the laser treatment group, which included 161 children, the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) score reduction ranged from 55.55% to 76.31%, with outcomes rated as good (24.61%) to excellent (60%). Laser treatment using local anaesthesia proved to be well tolerated by children. Our findings indicate that various methods—including trapeze-flap plasty, percutaneous collagen induction, phototherapy and fractional CO2 laser—demonstrate a relatively good response and an acceptable safety profile. Notably, light-based therapies/lasers may serve as safe, effective and tolerable options for scar treatment in this age group, often eliminating the need for general anaesthesia.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Wound Journal
International Wound Journal DERMATOLOGY-SURGERY
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
12.90%
发文量
266
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Editors welcome papers on all aspects of prevention and treatment of wounds and associated conditions in the fields of surgery, dermatology, oncology, nursing, radiotherapy, physical therapy, occupational therapy and podiatry. The Journal accepts papers in the following categories: - Research papers - Review articles - Clinical studies - Letters - News and Views: international perspectives, education initiatives, guidelines and different activities of groups and societies. Calendar of events The Editors are supported by a board of international experts and a panel of reviewers across a range of disciplines and specialties which ensures only the most current and relevant research is published.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信