测量骨盆底肌肉运动的新方法可提高骨盆底肌肉协调训练的可及性

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Aliza Rudavsky
{"title":"测量骨盆底肌肉运动的新方法可提高骨盆底肌肉协调训练的可及性","authors":"Aliza Rudavsky","doi":"10.1007/s00192-024-05949-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction and hypothesis: </strong>Pelvic floor muscle ultrasound is an important clinical tool for improving motor coordination and even strength. Although the gold standard approach involves transperineal probe placement, this is not always feasible with sensitive populations, requires privacy owing to probe placement, and additional sonography training. This article introduces a novel transabdominal method for measuring pelvic floor muscle motion that incorporates a reference point within the bladder. The hypothesis is that the novel measurement will correlate positively with transperineal measurements.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 55 women (15 nulliparous, 40 parous; 20 continent, 35 incontinent) performed pelvic floor muscle contraction and strain. Transabdominal ultrasound measured bladder diagonal length (BDL) and transperineal ultrasound measured bladder neck height (BNH), levator plate length (LPL), and levator plate angle (LPA). Spearman's test measured the correlation between the measurement outcomes and an independent t test compared outcomes based on parity and stress urinary incontinence symptom status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Spearman's correlation showed moderate positive correlations between the pelvic floor measurements for both tasks, which reduced slightly when grouping by parity and symptom status. Group differences were significant for BDL during the muscle contraction, factoring in SUI symptoms (p = 0.019) and parity status (p = 0.005) and LPL during contraction, factoring in parity status (p = 0.033).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>BDL correlates with BNH, LPL, and LPA with slightly reduced correlation when factoring in parity and continence status. The advantages of the method include accessibility for sensitive populations, nontraditional positions due to the anatomical reference point, functional locations due to limited privacy needs, and minimal training required for pelvic floor therapists to incorporate into rehabilitation.</p>","PeriodicalId":14355,"journal":{"name":"International Urogynecology Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Novel Method of Measuring Pelvic Floor Muscle Motion May Improve Accessibility of Pelvic Floor Muscle Coordination Training.\",\"authors\":\"Aliza Rudavsky\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00192-024-05949-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction and hypothesis: </strong>Pelvic floor muscle ultrasound is an important clinical tool for improving motor coordination and even strength. Although the gold standard approach involves transperineal probe placement, this is not always feasible with sensitive populations, requires privacy owing to probe placement, and additional sonography training. This article introduces a novel transabdominal method for measuring pelvic floor muscle motion that incorporates a reference point within the bladder. The hypothesis is that the novel measurement will correlate positively with transperineal measurements.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 55 women (15 nulliparous, 40 parous; 20 continent, 35 incontinent) performed pelvic floor muscle contraction and strain. Transabdominal ultrasound measured bladder diagonal length (BDL) and transperineal ultrasound measured bladder neck height (BNH), levator plate length (LPL), and levator plate angle (LPA). Spearman's test measured the correlation between the measurement outcomes and an independent t test compared outcomes based on parity and stress urinary incontinence symptom status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Spearman's correlation showed moderate positive correlations between the pelvic floor measurements for both tasks, which reduced slightly when grouping by parity and symptom status. Group differences were significant for BDL during the muscle contraction, factoring in SUI symptoms (p = 0.019) and parity status (p = 0.005) and LPL during contraction, factoring in parity status (p = 0.033).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>BDL correlates with BNH, LPL, and LPA with slightly reduced correlation when factoring in parity and continence status. The advantages of the method include accessibility for sensitive populations, nontraditional positions due to the anatomical reference point, functional locations due to limited privacy needs, and minimal training required for pelvic floor therapists to incorporate into rehabilitation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14355,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Urogynecology Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Urogynecology Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-024-05949-3\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Urogynecology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-024-05949-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言和假设:盆底肌肉超声波检查是一项重要的临床工具,可改善运动协调性,甚至增强力量。虽然金标准方法是经会阴部放置探头,但对于敏感人群来说并不总是可行,而且由于探头的放置需要保护隐私,还需要额外的超声波检查培训。本文介绍了一种测量盆底肌肉运动的新型经腹方法,该方法在膀胱内设置了一个参考点。假设该新型测量方法与经会阴测量方法呈正相关:方法:共有 55 名妇女(15 名无阴道,40 名有阴道;20 名尿失禁,35 名尿失禁)进行了盆底肌肉收缩和应变。经腹超声波测量膀胱对角线长度(BDL),经会阴超声波测量膀胱颈高度(BNH)、提肌板长度(LPL)和提肌板角度(LPA)。斯皮尔曼检验测定了测量结果之间的相关性,独立 t 检验比较了基于奇偶性和压力性尿失禁症状状态的测量结果:斯皮尔曼相关性检验显示,两项任务的盆底测量结果之间存在中等程度的正相关性,而根据孕妇产次和症状状况进行分组后,正相关性略有降低。在肌肉收缩时,考虑到 SUI 症状(p = 0.019)和产次状况(p = 0.005),BDL 的组间差异显著;在收缩时,考虑到产次状况(p = 0.033),LPL 的组间差异显著:结论:BDL与BNH、LPL和LPA相关,在考虑到产次和排便状况时,相关性略有降低。该方法的优点包括:可用于敏感人群、因解剖参考点而采用非传统体位、因隐私需求有限而采用功能性位置,以及盆底治疗师只需接受最低限度的培训即可将其纳入康复治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Novel Method of Measuring Pelvic Floor Muscle Motion May Improve Accessibility of Pelvic Floor Muscle Coordination Training.

Introduction and hypothesis: Pelvic floor muscle ultrasound is an important clinical tool for improving motor coordination and even strength. Although the gold standard approach involves transperineal probe placement, this is not always feasible with sensitive populations, requires privacy owing to probe placement, and additional sonography training. This article introduces a novel transabdominal method for measuring pelvic floor muscle motion that incorporates a reference point within the bladder. The hypothesis is that the novel measurement will correlate positively with transperineal measurements.

Methods: A total of 55 women (15 nulliparous, 40 parous; 20 continent, 35 incontinent) performed pelvic floor muscle contraction and strain. Transabdominal ultrasound measured bladder diagonal length (BDL) and transperineal ultrasound measured bladder neck height (BNH), levator plate length (LPL), and levator plate angle (LPA). Spearman's test measured the correlation between the measurement outcomes and an independent t test compared outcomes based on parity and stress urinary incontinence symptom status.

Results: Spearman's correlation showed moderate positive correlations between the pelvic floor measurements for both tasks, which reduced slightly when grouping by parity and symptom status. Group differences were significant for BDL during the muscle contraction, factoring in SUI symptoms (p = 0.019) and parity status (p = 0.005) and LPL during contraction, factoring in parity status (p = 0.033).

Conclusions: BDL correlates with BNH, LPL, and LPA with slightly reduced correlation when factoring in parity and continence status. The advantages of the method include accessibility for sensitive populations, nontraditional positions due to the anatomical reference point, functional locations due to limited privacy needs, and minimal training required for pelvic floor therapists to incorporate into rehabilitation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
22.20%
发文量
406
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Urogynecology Journal is the official journal of the International Urogynecological Association (IUGA).The International Urogynecology Journal has evolved in response to a perceived need amongst the clinicians, scientists, and researchers active in the field of urogynecology and pelvic floor disorders. Gynecologists, urologists, physiotherapists, nurses and basic scientists require regular means of communication within this field of pelvic floor dysfunction to express new ideas and research, and to review clinical practice in the diagnosis and treatment of women with disorders of the pelvic floor. This Journal has adopted the peer review process for all original contributions and will maintain high standards with regard to the research published therein. The clinical approach to urogynecology and pelvic floor disorders will be emphasized with each issue containing clinically relevant material that will be immediately applicable for clinical medicine. This publication covers all aspects of the field in an interdisciplinary fashion
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信