日本老年人认知功能最佳体育锻炼类型的横断面研究。

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Koki Nagata, Kyohei Shibuya, Yuya Fujii, Jaehoon Seol, Takashi Jindo, Tomohiro Okura
{"title":"日本老年人认知功能最佳体育锻炼类型的横断面研究。","authors":"Koki Nagata,&nbsp;Kyohei Shibuya,&nbsp;Yuya Fujii,&nbsp;Jaehoon Seol,&nbsp;Takashi Jindo,&nbsp;Tomohiro Okura","doi":"10.1111/ggi.14991","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>This study aimed to determine whether practicing coordination exercises, compared with other physical exercise types, is associated with better cognitive function in older Japanese adults.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This cross-sectional study used data from a health checkup project carried out from 2015 to 2019 among older adults living in Kasama City, Ibaraki Prefecture, Japan. Data from 569 participants (mean age 74.0 ± 5.4 years, 53.8% women) were analyzed. The types of physical exercise practiced within the seven preceding days were identified. The Five-Cog test and Trail Making Test were used to evaluate general cognitive function and executive function, respectively. The cognitive functions of practitioners and non-practitioners of each type of physical exercise – coordination, endurance, resistance, and stretching – were examined using an analysis of covariance.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Although practitioners of any physical exercise did not have significantly better cognitive function than non-practitioners, in an analysis stratified by exercise amount, those who practiced more coordination exercise had better general cognitive function than non-practitioners (<i>P</i> = 0.046), in a fully adjusted model.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Those who practiced more coordination exercises had better general cognitive function. <b>Geriatr Gerontol Int 2024; 24: 1173–1180</b>.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":12546,"journal":{"name":"Geriatrics & Gerontology International","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cross-sectional study of the optimal types of physical exercise for cognitive function in older Japanese adults\",\"authors\":\"Koki Nagata,&nbsp;Kyohei Shibuya,&nbsp;Yuya Fujii,&nbsp;Jaehoon Seol,&nbsp;Takashi Jindo,&nbsp;Tomohiro Okura\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ggi.14991\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aim</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study aimed to determine whether practicing coordination exercises, compared with other physical exercise types, is associated with better cognitive function in older Japanese adults.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>This cross-sectional study used data from a health checkup project carried out from 2015 to 2019 among older adults living in Kasama City, Ibaraki Prefecture, Japan. Data from 569 participants (mean age 74.0 ± 5.4 years, 53.8% women) were analyzed. The types of physical exercise practiced within the seven preceding days were identified. The Five-Cog test and Trail Making Test were used to evaluate general cognitive function and executive function, respectively. The cognitive functions of practitioners and non-practitioners of each type of physical exercise – coordination, endurance, resistance, and stretching – were examined using an analysis of covariance.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Although practitioners of any physical exercise did not have significantly better cognitive function than non-practitioners, in an analysis stratified by exercise amount, those who practiced more coordination exercise had better general cognitive function than non-practitioners (<i>P</i> = 0.046), in a fully adjusted model.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Those who practiced more coordination exercises had better general cognitive function. <b>Geriatr Gerontol Int 2024; 24: 1173–1180</b>.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12546,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geriatrics & Gerontology International\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geriatrics & Gerontology International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ggi.14991\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geriatrics & Gerontology International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ggi.14991","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在确定与其他类型的体育锻炼相比,练习协调运动是否与日本老年人认知功能的改善有关:这项横断面研究使用了2015年至2019年在日本茨城县笠间市老年人中开展的健康检查项目的数据。研究分析了 569 名参与者(平均年龄为 74.0 ± 5.4 岁,53.8% 为女性)的数据。研究人员确定了前七天内进行的体育锻炼类型。五格测试和追踪测试分别用于评估一般认知功能和执行功能。采用协方差分析法研究了协调、耐力、阻力和伸展等各类体育锻炼练习者和非练习者的认知功能:结果:虽然任何体育锻炼的练习者的认知功能都没有明显优于非练习者,但在按运动量分层的分析中,在完全调整模型中,那些进行更多协调性锻炼的人的一般认知功能优于非练习者(P = 0.046):结论:进行更多协调运动的人具有更好的一般认知功能。Geriatr Gerontol Int 2024; --:-----.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Cross-sectional study of the optimal types of physical exercise for cognitive function in older Japanese adults

Cross-sectional study of the optimal types of physical exercise for cognitive function in older Japanese adults

Aim

This study aimed to determine whether practicing coordination exercises, compared with other physical exercise types, is associated with better cognitive function in older Japanese adults.

Methods

This cross-sectional study used data from a health checkup project carried out from 2015 to 2019 among older adults living in Kasama City, Ibaraki Prefecture, Japan. Data from 569 participants (mean age 74.0 ± 5.4 years, 53.8% women) were analyzed. The types of physical exercise practiced within the seven preceding days were identified. The Five-Cog test and Trail Making Test were used to evaluate general cognitive function and executive function, respectively. The cognitive functions of practitioners and non-practitioners of each type of physical exercise – coordination, endurance, resistance, and stretching – were examined using an analysis of covariance.

Results

Although practitioners of any physical exercise did not have significantly better cognitive function than non-practitioners, in an analysis stratified by exercise amount, those who practiced more coordination exercise had better general cognitive function than non-practitioners (P = 0.046), in a fully adjusted model.

Conclusion

Those who practiced more coordination exercises had better general cognitive function. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2024; 24: 1173–1180.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
6.10%
发文量
189
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Geriatrics & Gerontology International is the official Journal of the Japan Geriatrics Society, reflecting the growing importance of the subject area in developed economies and their particular significance to a country like Japan with a large aging population. Geriatrics & Gerontology International is now an international publication with contributions from around the world and published four times per year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信