通过人工智能从普通血管造影对冠状动脉中段狭窄进行无创生理评估:STARFLOW 系统。

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Ovidio De Filippo, Raffaele Mineo, Michele Millesimo, Wojciech Wańha, Federica Proietto Salanitri, Antonio Greco, Antonio Maria Leone, Luca Franchin, Simone Palazzo, Giorgio Quadri, Domenico Tuttolomondo, Enrico Fabris, Gianluca Campo, Alessandra Truffa Giachet, Francesco Bruno, Mario Iannaccone, Giacomo Boccuzzi, Nicola Gaibazzi, Ferdinando Varbella, Wojciech Wojakowski, Michele Maremmani, Guglielmo Gallone, Gianfranco Sinagra, Davide Capodanno, Giuseppe Musumeci, Paolo Boretto, Pawel Pawlus, Andrea Saglietto, Francesco Burzotta, Marco Aldinucci, Daniela Giordano, Gaetano Maria De Ferrari, Concetto Spampinato, Fabrizio D'Ascenzo
{"title":"通过人工智能从普通血管造影对冠状动脉中段狭窄进行无创生理评估:STARFLOW 系统。","authors":"Ovidio De Filippo, Raffaele Mineo, Michele Millesimo, Wojciech Wańha, Federica Proietto Salanitri, Antonio Greco, Antonio Maria Leone, Luca Franchin, Simone Palazzo, Giorgio Quadri, Domenico Tuttolomondo, Enrico Fabris, Gianluca Campo, Alessandra Truffa Giachet, Francesco Bruno, Mario Iannaccone, Giacomo Boccuzzi, Nicola Gaibazzi, Ferdinando Varbella, Wojciech Wojakowski, Michele Maremmani, Guglielmo Gallone, Gianfranco Sinagra, Davide Capodanno, Giuseppe Musumeci, Paolo Boretto, Pawel Pawlus, Andrea Saglietto, Francesco Burzotta, Marco Aldinucci, Daniela Giordano, Gaetano Maria De Ferrari, Concetto Spampinato, Fabrizio D'Ascenzo","doi":"10.1093/ehjqcco/qcae024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite evidence supporting use of fractional flow reserve (FFR) and instantaneous waves-free ratio (iFR) to improve outcome of patients undergoing coronary angiography (CA) and percutaneous coronary intervention, such techniques are still underused in clinical practice due to economic and logistic issues.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aimed to develop an artificial intelligence (AI)-based application to compute FFR and iFR from plain CA.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Consecutive patients performing FFR or iFR or both were enrolled. A specific multi-task deep network exploiting 2 projections of the coronary of interest from standard CA was appraised. Accuracy of prediction of FFR/iFR of the AI model was the primary endpoint, along with sensitivity and specificity. Prediction was tested both for continuous values and for dichotomous classification (positive/negative) for FFR or iFR. Subgroup analyses were performed for FFR and iFR.A total of 389 patients from 5 centers were enrolled. Mean age was 67.9 ± 9.6 and 39.2% of patients were admitted for acute coronary syndrome. Overall, the accuracy was 87.3% (81.2-93.4%), with a sensitivity of 82.4% (71.9-96.4%) and a specificity of 92.2% (90.4-93.9%). For FFR, accuracy was 84.8% (77.8-91.8%), with a sensitivity of 81.9% (69.4-94.4%) and a specificity of 87.7% (85.5-89.9%), while for iFR accuracy was 90.2% (86.0-94.6%), with a sensitivity of 87.2% (76.6-97.8%) and a specificity of 93.2% (91.7-94.7%, all confidence intervals 95%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The presented machine-learning based tool showed high accuracy in prediction of wire-based FFR and iFR.</p>","PeriodicalId":11869,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Non-invasive physiological assessment of intermediate coronary stenoses from plain angiography through artificial intelligence: the STARFLOW system.\",\"authors\":\"Ovidio De Filippo, Raffaele Mineo, Michele Millesimo, Wojciech Wańha, Federica Proietto Salanitri, Antonio Greco, Antonio Maria Leone, Luca Franchin, Simone Palazzo, Giorgio Quadri, Domenico Tuttolomondo, Enrico Fabris, Gianluca Campo, Alessandra Truffa Giachet, Francesco Bruno, Mario Iannaccone, Giacomo Boccuzzi, Nicola Gaibazzi, Ferdinando Varbella, Wojciech Wojakowski, Michele Maremmani, Guglielmo Gallone, Gianfranco Sinagra, Davide Capodanno, Giuseppe Musumeci, Paolo Boretto, Pawel Pawlus, Andrea Saglietto, Francesco Burzotta, Marco Aldinucci, Daniela Giordano, Gaetano Maria De Ferrari, Concetto Spampinato, Fabrizio D'Ascenzo\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ehjqcco/qcae024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite evidence supporting use of fractional flow reserve (FFR) and instantaneous waves-free ratio (iFR) to improve outcome of patients undergoing coronary angiography (CA) and percutaneous coronary intervention, such techniques are still underused in clinical practice due to economic and logistic issues.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aimed to develop an artificial intelligence (AI)-based application to compute FFR and iFR from plain CA.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Consecutive patients performing FFR or iFR or both were enrolled. A specific multi-task deep network exploiting 2 projections of the coronary of interest from standard CA was appraised. Accuracy of prediction of FFR/iFR of the AI model was the primary endpoint, along with sensitivity and specificity. Prediction was tested both for continuous values and for dichotomous classification (positive/negative) for FFR or iFR. Subgroup analyses were performed for FFR and iFR.A total of 389 patients from 5 centers were enrolled. Mean age was 67.9 ± 9.6 and 39.2% of patients were admitted for acute coronary syndrome. Overall, the accuracy was 87.3% (81.2-93.4%), with a sensitivity of 82.4% (71.9-96.4%) and a specificity of 92.2% (90.4-93.9%). For FFR, accuracy was 84.8% (77.8-91.8%), with a sensitivity of 81.9% (69.4-94.4%) and a specificity of 87.7% (85.5-89.9%), while for iFR accuracy was 90.2% (86.0-94.6%), with a sensitivity of 87.2% (76.6-97.8%) and a specificity of 93.2% (91.7-94.7%, all confidence intervals 95%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The presented machine-learning based tool showed high accuracy in prediction of wire-based FFR and iFR.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11869,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjqcco/qcae024\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjqcco/qcae024","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尽管有证据支持使用分数血流储备(FFR)和瞬时无波比(iFR)来改善接受冠状动脉造影(CA)和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的患者的预后,但由于经济和物流问题,这些技术在临床实践中仍未得到充分利用:我们旨在开发一种基于人工智能(AI)的应用程序,以计算普通冠状动脉造影的 FFR 和 iFR:方法:我们招募了连续进行 FFR 或 iFR 或两者都进行的患者。对一个特定的多任务深度网络进行了评估,该网络利用了标准 CA 中感兴趣冠状动脉的两个投影。人工智能模型预测 FFR/iFR 的准确性以及灵敏度和特异性是主要终点。对 FFR 或 iFR 的连续值和二分法分类(阳性/阴性)进行了预测测试。对 FFR 和 iFR 进行了分组分析。共有来自 5 个中心的 389 名患者入选。平均年龄为(67.9±9.6)岁,39.2%的患者因急性冠脉综合征入院。总体准确率为 87.3%(81.2-93.4%),敏感性为 82.4%(71.9-96.4%),特异性为 92.2%(90.4-93.9%)。FFR的准确率为84.8%(77.8-91.8%),灵敏度为81.9%(69.4-94.4%),特异度为87.7%(85.5-89.9%);iFR的准确率为90.2%(86.0-94.6%),灵敏度为87.2%(76.6-97.8%),特异度为93.2%(91.7-94.7%,置信区间均为95%):结论:所介绍的基于机器学习的工具在预测基于导线的 FFR 和 iFR 方面具有很高的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Non-invasive physiological assessment of intermediate coronary stenoses from plain angiography through artificial intelligence: the STARFLOW system.

Background: Despite evidence supporting use of fractional flow reserve (FFR) and instantaneous waves-free ratio (iFR) to improve outcome of patients undergoing coronary angiography (CA) and percutaneous coronary intervention, such techniques are still underused in clinical practice due to economic and logistic issues.

Objectives: We aimed to develop an artificial intelligence (AI)-based application to compute FFR and iFR from plain CA.

Methods and results: Consecutive patients performing FFR or iFR or both were enrolled. A specific multi-task deep network exploiting 2 projections of the coronary of interest from standard CA was appraised. Accuracy of prediction of FFR/iFR of the AI model was the primary endpoint, along with sensitivity and specificity. Prediction was tested both for continuous values and for dichotomous classification (positive/negative) for FFR or iFR. Subgroup analyses were performed for FFR and iFR.A total of 389 patients from 5 centers were enrolled. Mean age was 67.9 ± 9.6 and 39.2% of patients were admitted for acute coronary syndrome. Overall, the accuracy was 87.3% (81.2-93.4%), with a sensitivity of 82.4% (71.9-96.4%) and a specificity of 92.2% (90.4-93.9%). For FFR, accuracy was 84.8% (77.8-91.8%), with a sensitivity of 81.9% (69.4-94.4%) and a specificity of 87.7% (85.5-89.9%), while for iFR accuracy was 90.2% (86.0-94.6%), with a sensitivity of 87.2% (76.6-97.8%) and a specificity of 93.2% (91.7-94.7%, all confidence intervals 95%).

Conclusion: The presented machine-learning based tool showed high accuracy in prediction of wire-based FFR and iFR.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
3.80%
发文量
76
期刊介绍: European Heart Journal - Quality of Care & Clinical Outcomes is an English language, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to publishing cardiovascular outcomes research. It serves as an official journal of the European Society of Cardiology and maintains a close alliance with the European Heart Health Institute. The journal disseminates original research and topical reviews contributed by health scientists globally, with a focus on the quality of care and its impact on cardiovascular outcomes at the hospital, national, and international levels. It provides a platform for presenting the most outstanding cardiovascular outcomes research to influence cardiovascular public health policy on a global scale. Additionally, the journal aims to motivate young investigators and foster the growth of the outcomes research community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信