加拿大性别中立的人类乳头瘤病毒常规疫苗接种计划从 2 剂改为 1 剂:数学模型分析。

IF 9.4 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Mélanie Drolet, Jean-François Laprise, Éléonore Chamberland, Chantal Sauvageau, Sarah Wilson, Gillian H Lim, Gina Ogilvie, Ashleigh Tuite, Marc Brisson
{"title":"加拿大性别中立的人类乳头瘤病毒常规疫苗接种计划从 2 剂改为 1 剂:数学模型分析。","authors":"Mélanie Drolet, Jean-François Laprise, Éléonore Chamberland, Chantal Sauvageau, Sarah Wilson, Gillian H Lim, Gina Ogilvie, Ashleigh Tuite, Marc Brisson","doi":"10.1503/cmaj.240787","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Worldwide, countries are examining whether to implement 1-dose human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination instead of using 2 doses. To inform policy, we sought to project the population-level impact and efficiency of switching from 2-dose to 1-dose gender-neutral routine HPV vaccination in Canada.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used HPV-ADVISE, an individual-based transmission-dynamic model of HPV infections and diseases, to mathematically model vaccination programs in 2 provinces, Quebec, a province with high HPV vaccination coverage (around 85%), and Ontario, which has lower coverage (around 65%). We examined non-inferior and pessimistic scenarios of the efficacy (vaccine efficacy of 98% or 90%) and average vaccine duration (lifelong, 30 yr, or 25 yr) of 1 dose compared with 2 doses (98% vaccine efficacy, lifelong vaccine duration). Our main outcomes were the relative reduction in HPV-16 (by sex) and cervical cancers, and the number of doses needed to prevent 1 cervical cancer.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our model projected that 1-dose HPV vaccination would avert a similar number of cervical cancers as 2 doses in Canada, under various scenarios. Under the most pessimistic scenario (25-yr vaccine duration), 1-dose vaccination would avert fewer cervical cancers than 2 doses, by about 3 percentage points over 100 years. All 1-dose scenarios were projected to lead to elimination of cervical cancer (< 4 cervical cancers/100 000 female-years) and to be a substantially more efficient use of vaccine doses than a 2-dose scenario (1-dose v. no vaccination = 800-1000 doses needed to prevent 1 cervical cancer; incremental doses for 2-dose v. 1-dose vaccination > 10 000 doses needed to prevent 1 additional cervical cancer).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>If the average duration of 1-dose protection is longer than 25 years, a 1-dose HPV vaccination program would protect those vaccinated during their peak ages of sexual activity and prevent a similar number of HPV-related cancers as a 2-dose program, while being a more efficient use of vaccine doses.</p>","PeriodicalId":9609,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Medical Association journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":9.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11464022/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Switching from a 2-dose to a 1-dose program of gender-neutral routine vaccination against human papillomavirus in Canada: a mathematical modelling analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Mélanie Drolet, Jean-François Laprise, Éléonore Chamberland, Chantal Sauvageau, Sarah Wilson, Gillian H Lim, Gina Ogilvie, Ashleigh Tuite, Marc Brisson\",\"doi\":\"10.1503/cmaj.240787\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Worldwide, countries are examining whether to implement 1-dose human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination instead of using 2 doses. To inform policy, we sought to project the population-level impact and efficiency of switching from 2-dose to 1-dose gender-neutral routine HPV vaccination in Canada.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used HPV-ADVISE, an individual-based transmission-dynamic model of HPV infections and diseases, to mathematically model vaccination programs in 2 provinces, Quebec, a province with high HPV vaccination coverage (around 85%), and Ontario, which has lower coverage (around 65%). We examined non-inferior and pessimistic scenarios of the efficacy (vaccine efficacy of 98% or 90%) and average vaccine duration (lifelong, 30 yr, or 25 yr) of 1 dose compared with 2 doses (98% vaccine efficacy, lifelong vaccine duration). Our main outcomes were the relative reduction in HPV-16 (by sex) and cervical cancers, and the number of doses needed to prevent 1 cervical cancer.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our model projected that 1-dose HPV vaccination would avert a similar number of cervical cancers as 2 doses in Canada, under various scenarios. Under the most pessimistic scenario (25-yr vaccine duration), 1-dose vaccination would avert fewer cervical cancers than 2 doses, by about 3 percentage points over 100 years. All 1-dose scenarios were projected to lead to elimination of cervical cancer (< 4 cervical cancers/100 000 female-years) and to be a substantially more efficient use of vaccine doses than a 2-dose scenario (1-dose v. no vaccination = 800-1000 doses needed to prevent 1 cervical cancer; incremental doses for 2-dose v. 1-dose vaccination > 10 000 doses needed to prevent 1 additional cervical cancer).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>If the average duration of 1-dose protection is longer than 25 years, a 1-dose HPV vaccination program would protect those vaccinated during their peak ages of sexual activity and prevent a similar number of HPV-related cancers as a 2-dose program, while being a more efficient use of vaccine doses.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9609,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Medical Association journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11464022/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Medical Association journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.240787\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Medical Association journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.240787","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在世界范围内,各国都在研究是否实施单剂人类乳头瘤病毒(HPV)疫苗接种,而不是使用两剂疫苗。为了给政策提供信息,我们试图预测在加拿大将性别中立的常规 HPV 疫苗接种从 2 剂改为 1 剂对人群的影响和效率:我们使用 HPV-ADVISE(一种基于个体的 HPV 感染和疾病传播动态模型)对两个省份的疫苗接种计划进行了数学建模,一个是 HPV 疫苗接种覆盖率较高(约 85%)的魁北克省,另一个是覆盖率较低(约 65%)的安大略省。我们研究了 1 剂疫苗与 2 剂疫苗(疫苗效力为 98% 或 90%)相比的效力(疫苗效力为 98% 或 90%)和平均接种时间(终身、30 年或 25 年)的非劣效和悲观情况(疫苗效力为 98%,疫苗接种时间为终身)。我们的主要结果是 HPV-16(按性别)和宫颈癌的相对减少量,以及预防 1 例宫颈癌所需的剂量:我们的模型预测,在加拿大,在不同情况下,接种 1 剂 HPV 疫苗与接种 2 剂疫苗可避免的宫颈癌数量相似。在最悲观的情况下(疫苗接种时间为 25 年),接种 1 剂疫苗可避免的宫颈癌数量比接种 2 剂疫苗少,100 年内减少约 3 个百分点。据预测,所有 1 剂方案都能消除宫颈癌(< 4 例宫颈癌/10 万女性年),而且疫苗剂量的使用效率大大高于 2 剂方案(接种 1 剂疫苗与不接种疫苗相比,预防 1 例宫颈癌需要 800-1000 剂疫苗;接种 2 剂疫苗与接种 1 剂疫苗相比,预防 1 例新增宫颈癌需要 > 10000 剂疫苗):如果1剂疫苗的平均保护期超过25年,那么1剂HPV疫苗接种计划将保护那些在性活动高峰期接种疫苗的人,并预防与2剂疫苗接种计划相似数量的HPV相关癌症,同时更有效地利用疫苗剂量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Switching from a 2-dose to a 1-dose program of gender-neutral routine vaccination against human papillomavirus in Canada: a mathematical modelling analysis.

Background: Worldwide, countries are examining whether to implement 1-dose human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination instead of using 2 doses. To inform policy, we sought to project the population-level impact and efficiency of switching from 2-dose to 1-dose gender-neutral routine HPV vaccination in Canada.

Methods: We used HPV-ADVISE, an individual-based transmission-dynamic model of HPV infections and diseases, to mathematically model vaccination programs in 2 provinces, Quebec, a province with high HPV vaccination coverage (around 85%), and Ontario, which has lower coverage (around 65%). We examined non-inferior and pessimistic scenarios of the efficacy (vaccine efficacy of 98% or 90%) and average vaccine duration (lifelong, 30 yr, or 25 yr) of 1 dose compared with 2 doses (98% vaccine efficacy, lifelong vaccine duration). Our main outcomes were the relative reduction in HPV-16 (by sex) and cervical cancers, and the number of doses needed to prevent 1 cervical cancer.

Results: Our model projected that 1-dose HPV vaccination would avert a similar number of cervical cancers as 2 doses in Canada, under various scenarios. Under the most pessimistic scenario (25-yr vaccine duration), 1-dose vaccination would avert fewer cervical cancers than 2 doses, by about 3 percentage points over 100 years. All 1-dose scenarios were projected to lead to elimination of cervical cancer (< 4 cervical cancers/100 000 female-years) and to be a substantially more efficient use of vaccine doses than a 2-dose scenario (1-dose v. no vaccination = 800-1000 doses needed to prevent 1 cervical cancer; incremental doses for 2-dose v. 1-dose vaccination > 10 000 doses needed to prevent 1 additional cervical cancer).

Interpretation: If the average duration of 1-dose protection is longer than 25 years, a 1-dose HPV vaccination program would protect those vaccinated during their peak ages of sexual activity and prevent a similar number of HPV-related cancers as a 2-dose program, while being a more efficient use of vaccine doses.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Canadian Medical Association journal
Canadian Medical Association journal 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
4.10%
发文量
481
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: CMAJ (Canadian Medical Association Journal) is a peer-reviewed general medical journal renowned for publishing original research, commentaries, analyses, reviews, clinical practice updates, and editorials. Led by Editor-in-Chief Dr. Kirsten Patrick, it has a significant impact on healthcare in Canada and globally, with a 2022 impact factor of 17.4. Its mission is to promote knowledge vital for the health of Canadians and the global community, guided by values of service, evidence, and integrity. The journal's vision emphasizes the importance of the best evidence, practice, and health outcomes. CMAJ covers a broad range of topics, focusing on contributing to the evidence base, influencing clinical practice, and raising awareness of pressing health issues among policymakers and the public. Since 2020, with the appointment of a Lead of Patient Involvement, CMAJ is committed to integrating patients into its governance and operations, encouraging their content submissions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信