100% 自体富血小板血浆和 100% 自体血清对干眼症的疗效:随机对照试验。

IF 2 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Passara Jongkhajornpong, Kaevalin Lekhanont, Sasivimol Rattanasiri, Pawin Numthavaj, Gareth McKay, John Attia, Ammarin Thakkinstian
{"title":"100% 自体富血小板血浆和 100% 自体血清对干眼症的疗效:随机对照试验。","authors":"Passara Jongkhajornpong, Kaevalin Lekhanont, Sasivimol Rattanasiri, Pawin Numthavaj, Gareth McKay, John Attia, Ammarin Thakkinstian","doi":"10.1136/bmjophth-2024-001857","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The 0bjective is to compare treatment effects between undiluted autologous platelet-rich plasma (APRP) and autologous serum (AS) in patients with moderate-to-severe dry eye disease (DED).</p><p><strong>Methods and analysis: </strong>A single-centre, randomised, double-masked, non-inferiority clinical trial was conducted. 96 adult DED patients with an Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) Score of ≥23 and/or Oxford staining grade of ≥2 were randomised to receive either 100% APRP (n=48) or 100% AS (n=48) for 4 weeks. Primary outcomes included OSDI Score and ocular surface staining measured by Oxford grading scale at 4 weeks. Secondary outcomes included fluorescein tear break-up time, Schirmer's test, meibum quality and expressibility, and adverse events. The 95% CI for the mean difference in OSDI scores between groups was estimated to assess non-inferiority of the OSDI score at a prespecified margin of 4.18 points.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At week 4, there was no significant difference in decreased OSDI scores between groups, with the mean difference (100% APRP-100% AS) of 1.41 (95% CI -1.26, 4.08, p=0.299). The upper limit was less than the prespecified margin, indicating non-inferiority of 100% APRP vs 100% AS. The probabilities of achieving an Oxford grade 0-1 after treatment were not significantly different between groups, with an OR of 0.61 (95% CI 0.25, 1.52, p=0.288). No significant differences in secondary outcomes were observed between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In the short-term, 100% APRP was not inferior to 100% AS in reducing dry eye symptoms and ocular surface staining in moderate-to-severe DED.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>NCT04683796.</p>","PeriodicalId":9286,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Ophthalmology","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11474780/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of 100% autologous platelet-rich plasma and 100% autologous serum in dry eye disease: a randomised controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Passara Jongkhajornpong, Kaevalin Lekhanont, Sasivimol Rattanasiri, Pawin Numthavaj, Gareth McKay, John Attia, Ammarin Thakkinstian\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjophth-2024-001857\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The 0bjective is to compare treatment effects between undiluted autologous platelet-rich plasma (APRP) and autologous serum (AS) in patients with moderate-to-severe dry eye disease (DED).</p><p><strong>Methods and analysis: </strong>A single-centre, randomised, double-masked, non-inferiority clinical trial was conducted. 96 adult DED patients with an Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) Score of ≥23 and/or Oxford staining grade of ≥2 were randomised to receive either 100% APRP (n=48) or 100% AS (n=48) for 4 weeks. Primary outcomes included OSDI Score and ocular surface staining measured by Oxford grading scale at 4 weeks. Secondary outcomes included fluorescein tear break-up time, Schirmer's test, meibum quality and expressibility, and adverse events. The 95% CI for the mean difference in OSDI scores between groups was estimated to assess non-inferiority of the OSDI score at a prespecified margin of 4.18 points.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At week 4, there was no significant difference in decreased OSDI scores between groups, with the mean difference (100% APRP-100% AS) of 1.41 (95% CI -1.26, 4.08, p=0.299). The upper limit was less than the prespecified margin, indicating non-inferiority of 100% APRP vs 100% AS. The probabilities of achieving an Oxford grade 0-1 after treatment were not significantly different between groups, with an OR of 0.61 (95% CI 0.25, 1.52, p=0.288). No significant differences in secondary outcomes were observed between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In the short-term, 100% APRP was not inferior to 100% AS in reducing dry eye symptoms and ocular surface staining in moderate-to-severe DED.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>NCT04683796.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9286,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Open Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11474780/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Open Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2024-001857\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2024-001857","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:目的是比较未经稀释的自体富血小板血浆(APRP)和自体血清(AS)对中重度干眼症(DED)患者的治疗效果:进行了一项单中心、随机、双掩蔽、非劣效性临床试验。96名眼表疾病指数(OSDI)评分≥23和/或牛津染色等级≥2的成人干眼症患者被随机分配接受100% APRP(48人)或100% AS(48人)治疗,为期4周。主要结果包括 4 周后的 OSDI 评分和牛津分级法测定的眼表染色。次要结果包括荧光素泪液破裂时间、Schirmer试验、睑板腺质量和可表达性以及不良事件。我们估算了各组间OSDI评分平均差异的95% CI,以评估OSDI评分的非劣效性,预设差值为4.18分:第4周时,各组间的OSDI评分下降幅度无显著差异,平均差异(100% APRP-100% AS)为1.41(95% CI -1.26, 4.08, p=0.299)。上限小于预设差值,表明100% APRP与100% AS相比无劣效性。治疗后达到牛津0-1级的概率组间无显著差异,OR值为0.61(95% CI 0.25,1.52,p=0.288)。各组间的次要结果无明显差异:结论:在短期内,100% APRP 在减轻中重度 DED 干眼症状和眼表面染色方面并不逊色于 100% AS:试验注册号:NCT04683796。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy of 100% autologous platelet-rich plasma and 100% autologous serum in dry eye disease: a randomised controlled trial.

Objective: The 0bjective is to compare treatment effects between undiluted autologous platelet-rich plasma (APRP) and autologous serum (AS) in patients with moderate-to-severe dry eye disease (DED).

Methods and analysis: A single-centre, randomised, double-masked, non-inferiority clinical trial was conducted. 96 adult DED patients with an Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) Score of ≥23 and/or Oxford staining grade of ≥2 were randomised to receive either 100% APRP (n=48) or 100% AS (n=48) for 4 weeks. Primary outcomes included OSDI Score and ocular surface staining measured by Oxford grading scale at 4 weeks. Secondary outcomes included fluorescein tear break-up time, Schirmer's test, meibum quality and expressibility, and adverse events. The 95% CI for the mean difference in OSDI scores between groups was estimated to assess non-inferiority of the OSDI score at a prespecified margin of 4.18 points.

Results: At week 4, there was no significant difference in decreased OSDI scores between groups, with the mean difference (100% APRP-100% AS) of 1.41 (95% CI -1.26, 4.08, p=0.299). The upper limit was less than the prespecified margin, indicating non-inferiority of 100% APRP vs 100% AS. The probabilities of achieving an Oxford grade 0-1 after treatment were not significantly different between groups, with an OR of 0.61 (95% CI 0.25, 1.52, p=0.288). No significant differences in secondary outcomes were observed between groups.

Conclusion: In the short-term, 100% APRP was not inferior to 100% AS in reducing dry eye symptoms and ocular surface staining in moderate-to-severe DED.

Trial registration number: NCT04683796.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Open Ophthalmology
BMJ Open Ophthalmology OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.20%
发文量
104
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信