对患有鹿角形肾结石的成年患者进行完全仰卧位经皮肾镜碎石术时,是否必须使用双 J 支架?

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Siavash Falahatkar, Samaneh Esmaeili, Samira Kazemi, Fatemeh Sheikhi, Hosna Norouzi
{"title":"对患有鹿角形肾结石的成年患者进行完全仰卧位经皮肾镜碎石术时,是否必须使用双 J 支架?","authors":"Siavash Falahatkar, Samaneh Esmaeili, Samira Kazemi, Fatemeh Sheikhi, Hosna Norouzi","doi":"10.1186/s12894-024-01610-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>It is controversial whether double-J (DJ) stent insertion is necessary in tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) for patients with staghorn stones. We compared the outcomes of using ureteral catheters and double-J stents in tubeless complete supine PCNL (csPCNL) of staghorn stones.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this analytical cross-sectional study, from May 2008 to August 2022, 123 patients who underwent tubeless csPCNL were assessed. Patients were divided into two groups by either tubeless csPCNL with DJ stent (Group I; n = 23) or totally tubeless just with perioperative ureteral stent (Group II; n = 100). Demographic characteristics, stone-related factors, perioperative and postoperative parameters were compared in groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baseline characteristics were comparable in groups. The operative time in group I was significantly longer than group II (68.26 vs. 55.25 min, P = 0.05). However, the duration of hospitalization in Group I was shorter than the other group (1.81 vs. 2.37 days, P = 0.03). Stone free rate was notably higher in Group I (90.5% vs. 79.8.0%) with no statistically significant difference. No significant differences were found in major complications. Patients in Group II had a significantly shorter time to return to normal life (6.48 vs. 7.91 day; P = 0.043). Multivariable linear regression showed the preoperative creatinine level and stone size can affect the operative time (P = 0.02). In addition, stone number and underlying disease can affect the length of hospital stay (P = 0.007 & 0.030, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although not inserting a double J stent after csPCNL has acceptable results, because of higher residual rate in staghorn stone which cause more incidence of renal colic, longer time of hospital stay and return to normal life, inserting DJ stent is recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":9285,"journal":{"name":"BMC Urology","volume":"24 1","pages":"216"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11457343/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is double-J stent mandatory in complete supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy for adult patients with staghorn renal stones?\",\"authors\":\"Siavash Falahatkar, Samaneh Esmaeili, Samira Kazemi, Fatemeh Sheikhi, Hosna Norouzi\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12894-024-01610-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>It is controversial whether double-J (DJ) stent insertion is necessary in tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) for patients with staghorn stones. We compared the outcomes of using ureteral catheters and double-J stents in tubeless complete supine PCNL (csPCNL) of staghorn stones.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this analytical cross-sectional study, from May 2008 to August 2022, 123 patients who underwent tubeless csPCNL were assessed. Patients were divided into two groups by either tubeless csPCNL with DJ stent (Group I; n = 23) or totally tubeless just with perioperative ureteral stent (Group II; n = 100). Demographic characteristics, stone-related factors, perioperative and postoperative parameters were compared in groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baseline characteristics were comparable in groups. The operative time in group I was significantly longer than group II (68.26 vs. 55.25 min, P = 0.05). However, the duration of hospitalization in Group I was shorter than the other group (1.81 vs. 2.37 days, P = 0.03). Stone free rate was notably higher in Group I (90.5% vs. 79.8.0%) with no statistically significant difference. No significant differences were found in major complications. Patients in Group II had a significantly shorter time to return to normal life (6.48 vs. 7.91 day; P = 0.043). Multivariable linear regression showed the preoperative creatinine level and stone size can affect the operative time (P = 0.02). In addition, stone number and underlying disease can affect the length of hospital stay (P = 0.007 & 0.030, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although not inserting a double J stent after csPCNL has acceptable results, because of higher residual rate in staghorn stone which cause more incidence of renal colic, longer time of hospital stay and return to normal life, inserting DJ stent is recommended.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9285,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Urology\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"216\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11457343/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-024-01610-9\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-024-01610-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在对鹿角状结石患者进行无管经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)时,是否有必要插入双J(Double-J)支架尚存在争议。我们比较了在无管完全仰卧位 PCNL(csPCNL)治疗鹿角状结石时使用输尿管导管和双 J 支架的效果:在这项横断面分析研究中,对2008年5月至2022年8月期间接受无管完全仰卧位PCNL的123名患者进行了评估。患者被分为两组,一组是带DJ支架的无管csPCNL(I组;n = 23),另一组是仅带围术期输尿管支架的完全无管(II组;n = 100)。比较了各组的人口统计学特征、结石相关因素、围手术期和术后参数:结果:各组的基线特征相当。第一组的手术时间明显长于第二组(68.26 分钟对 55.25 分钟,P = 0.05)。然而,第一组的住院时间比另一组短(1.81 对 2.37 天,P = 0.03)。第一组的无结石率明显更高(90.5% 对 79.8.0%),但无统计学差异。在主要并发症方面没有发现明显差异。第二组患者恢复正常生活的时间明显更短(6.48 天对 7.91 天;P = 0.043)。多变量线性回归显示,术前肌酐水平和结石大小会影响手术时间(P = 0.02)。此外,结石数量和基础疾病也会影响住院时间(P = 0.007 和 0.030):结论:虽然 csPCNL 术后不植入双 J 支架的效果可以接受,但由于鹿角状结石的残留率较高,导致肾绞痛的发生率较高,住院时间较长,恢复正常生活的时间也较长,因此建议植入 DJ 支架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Is double-J stent mandatory in complete supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy for adult patients with staghorn renal stones?

Background: It is controversial whether double-J (DJ) stent insertion is necessary in tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) for patients with staghorn stones. We compared the outcomes of using ureteral catheters and double-J stents in tubeless complete supine PCNL (csPCNL) of staghorn stones.

Methods: In this analytical cross-sectional study, from May 2008 to August 2022, 123 patients who underwent tubeless csPCNL were assessed. Patients were divided into two groups by either tubeless csPCNL with DJ stent (Group I; n = 23) or totally tubeless just with perioperative ureteral stent (Group II; n = 100). Demographic characteristics, stone-related factors, perioperative and postoperative parameters were compared in groups.

Results: Baseline characteristics were comparable in groups. The operative time in group I was significantly longer than group II (68.26 vs. 55.25 min, P = 0.05). However, the duration of hospitalization in Group I was shorter than the other group (1.81 vs. 2.37 days, P = 0.03). Stone free rate was notably higher in Group I (90.5% vs. 79.8.0%) with no statistically significant difference. No significant differences were found in major complications. Patients in Group II had a significantly shorter time to return to normal life (6.48 vs. 7.91 day; P = 0.043). Multivariable linear regression showed the preoperative creatinine level and stone size can affect the operative time (P = 0.02). In addition, stone number and underlying disease can affect the length of hospital stay (P = 0.007 & 0.030, respectively).

Conclusion: Although not inserting a double J stent after csPCNL has acceptable results, because of higher residual rate in staghorn stone which cause more incidence of renal colic, longer time of hospital stay and return to normal life, inserting DJ stent is recommended.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Urology
BMC Urology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
177
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Urology is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of urological disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology. The journal considers manuscripts in the following broad subject-specific sections of urology: Endourology and technology Epidemiology and health outcomes Pediatric urology Pre-clinical and basic research Reconstructive urology Sexual function and fertility Urological imaging Urological oncology Voiding dysfunction Case reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信