{"title":"无论采用哪种手术方法,外科医生的手感都会影响初级全髋关节置换术中的髋臼杯定位。","authors":"Ahmed A Khalifa, Ahmed Abdelazim Hassan","doi":"10.1186/s12891-024-07868-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim was to investigate the effect of surgeon handedness on acetabular cup positioning, functional outcomes, and dislocation incidence during primary THA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. Studies published in English were searched in three databases (PubMed, Embase, and Scopus). A dominant side is a right-handed (RHD) or left-handed (LHD) surgeon who operates on the right or left hip, respectively. The opposite is considered to be the non-dominant side. We used odds ratios for dichotomous data and mean differences for continuous data, with 95% confidence intervals for quantitative data synthesis. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I² test, with outcomes graphically represented in a forest plot and a p-value of < 0.05 considered statistically significant; analyses were performed using Review Manager 5.4 (RevMan 5.4.1). >.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Four observational studies were included out of 98 articles. Ten experienced surgeons participated (8 RHD and 2 LHD) and operated on 822 patients (1484 hips), divided equally between dominant and non-dominant sides, and the posterolateral approach was utilized in 80.9% of THAs. RHD surgeons operated on 1404 (94.6%) THAs. The pooled synthesis for inclination indicated no significant difference between either side [MD: 0.10 (95% CI -2.10 to 2.30, P = 0.93, I² = 91%)]. While the difference was significant for anteversion [MD: -2.37 (95% CI -3.82 to -0.93, P = 0.001, I² = 31%)]. The functional outcome was better on the dominant side [MD: 1.44 (95% CI 0.41 to 2.48, P = 0.006, I² = 0%)], and the dislocation incidence was significantly higher on the non-dominant side [OR: 0.45 (95% CI 0.25 to 0.81, P = 0.008, I² = 0%)].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Surgeon handedness and whether operating on the dominant or non-dominant side could affect the acetabular cup positioning and outcomes during primary THAs, even in the hands of high-volume surgeons.</p>","PeriodicalId":9189,"journal":{"name":"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11460204/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Surgeon handedness affects the acetabular cup positioning during primary total hip arthroplasty regardless of the surgical approach. a systematic review and metanalysis.\",\"authors\":\"Ahmed A Khalifa, Ahmed Abdelazim Hassan\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12891-024-07868-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim was to investigate the effect of surgeon handedness on acetabular cup positioning, functional outcomes, and dislocation incidence during primary THA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. Studies published in English were searched in three databases (PubMed, Embase, and Scopus). A dominant side is a right-handed (RHD) or left-handed (LHD) surgeon who operates on the right or left hip, respectively. The opposite is considered to be the non-dominant side. We used odds ratios for dichotomous data and mean differences for continuous data, with 95% confidence intervals for quantitative data synthesis. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I² test, with outcomes graphically represented in a forest plot and a p-value of < 0.05 considered statistically significant; analyses were performed using Review Manager 5.4 (RevMan 5.4.1). >.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Four observational studies were included out of 98 articles. Ten experienced surgeons participated (8 RHD and 2 LHD) and operated on 822 patients (1484 hips), divided equally between dominant and non-dominant sides, and the posterolateral approach was utilized in 80.9% of THAs. RHD surgeons operated on 1404 (94.6%) THAs. The pooled synthesis for inclination indicated no significant difference between either side [MD: 0.10 (95% CI -2.10 to 2.30, P = 0.93, I² = 91%)]. While the difference was significant for anteversion [MD: -2.37 (95% CI -3.82 to -0.93, P = 0.001, I² = 31%)]. The functional outcome was better on the dominant side [MD: 1.44 (95% CI 0.41 to 2.48, P = 0.006, I² = 0%)], and the dislocation incidence was significantly higher on the non-dominant side [OR: 0.45 (95% CI 0.25 to 0.81, P = 0.008, I² = 0%)].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Surgeon handedness and whether operating on the dominant or non-dominant side could affect the acetabular cup positioning and outcomes during primary THAs, even in the hands of high-volume surgeons.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9189,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11460204/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-024-07868-2\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-024-07868-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:旨在研究外科医生的手势对初级 THA 中髋臼杯定位、功能结果和脱位发生率的影响:根据 PRISMA 指南进行了系统性回顾。在三个数据库(PubMed、Embase 和 Scopus)中检索了用英语发表的研究。优势侧是指分别在右侧或左侧髋关节进行手术的右撇子(RHD)或左撇子(LHD)外科医生。反之则为非优势侧。对于二分法数据,我们使用几率比;对于连续数据,我们使用平均差;对于定量数据综合,我们使用 95% 置信区间。异质性采用 I² 检验进行评估,结果用森林图表示,P 值为 .结果:在 98 篇文章中纳入了 4 项观察性研究。10名经验丰富的外科医生(8名RHD和2名LHD)参与了研究,为822名患者(1484个髋关节)进行了手术,优势侧和非优势侧各占一半,80.9%的THA采用了后外侧入路。RHD外科医生对1404例(94.6%)THA进行了手术。对倾斜度的综合分析表明,两侧的差异并不显著[MD:0.10 (95% CI -2.10 to 2.30, P = 0.93, I² = 91%)]。而内翻差异明显[MD:-2.37 (95% CI -3.82 to -0.93,P = 0.001,I² = 31%)]。优势侧的功能结果更好[MD:1.44 (95% CI 0.41 to 2.48, P = 0.006, I² = 0%)],而非优势侧的脱位发生率明显更高[OR:0.45 (95% CI 0.25 to 0.81, P = 0.008, I² = 0%)]:结论:外科医生的手型以及在优势侧或非优势侧进行手术可能会影响髋臼杯的定位和初次全髋关节置换术的结果,即使是在工作量大的外科医生手中也是如此。
Surgeon handedness affects the acetabular cup positioning during primary total hip arthroplasty regardless of the surgical approach. a systematic review and metanalysis.
Purpose: The aim was to investigate the effect of surgeon handedness on acetabular cup positioning, functional outcomes, and dislocation incidence during primary THA.
Methods: A systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. Studies published in English were searched in three databases (PubMed, Embase, and Scopus). A dominant side is a right-handed (RHD) or left-handed (LHD) surgeon who operates on the right or left hip, respectively. The opposite is considered to be the non-dominant side. We used odds ratios for dichotomous data and mean differences for continuous data, with 95% confidence intervals for quantitative data synthesis. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I² test, with outcomes graphically represented in a forest plot and a p-value of < 0.05 considered statistically significant; analyses were performed using Review Manager 5.4 (RevMan 5.4.1). >.
Result: Four observational studies were included out of 98 articles. Ten experienced surgeons participated (8 RHD and 2 LHD) and operated on 822 patients (1484 hips), divided equally between dominant and non-dominant sides, and the posterolateral approach was utilized in 80.9% of THAs. RHD surgeons operated on 1404 (94.6%) THAs. The pooled synthesis for inclination indicated no significant difference between either side [MD: 0.10 (95% CI -2.10 to 2.30, P = 0.93, I² = 91%)]. While the difference was significant for anteversion [MD: -2.37 (95% CI -3.82 to -0.93, P = 0.001, I² = 31%)]. The functional outcome was better on the dominant side [MD: 1.44 (95% CI 0.41 to 2.48, P = 0.006, I² = 0%)], and the dislocation incidence was significantly higher on the non-dominant side [OR: 0.45 (95% CI 0.25 to 0.81, P = 0.008, I² = 0%)].
Conclusion: Surgeon handedness and whether operating on the dominant or non-dominant side could affect the acetabular cup positioning and outcomes during primary THAs, even in the hands of high-volume surgeons.
期刊介绍:
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of musculoskeletal disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
The scope of the Journal covers research into rheumatic diseases where the primary focus relates specifically to a component(s) of the musculoskeletal system.