评估美国医院母乳喂养教育材料中使用的性别包容语言。

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Aria Grabowski, Sophie Branham, Olivia S Anderson
{"title":"评估美国医院母乳喂养教育材料中使用的性别包容语言。","authors":"Aria Grabowski, Sophie Branham, Olivia S Anderson","doi":"10.1089/bfm.2024.0166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Purpose:</i></b> To assess the use of gender-identity inclusive language in breastfeeding education materials publicly available on U.S. Hospital websites. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Hospitals were identified through the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists website. Breastfeeding education materials were searched online at each hospital. The first breastfeeding material on each website was used for our evaluation. Gender-identity inclusive versus traditional sexed language terms were curated <i>a priori</i> by referencing the National Institutes of Health and American Psychological Associations' guidelines. Education materials were categorized into: (1) \"gender-identity inclusive language,\" (2) \"mix of inclusive and traditional sexed language,\" or (3) \"traditional sexed language.\" Frequencies of the type of language and specific gender-related terms were calculated. <b><i>Results:</i></b> In total, <i>n</i> = 112 hospitals with publicly available breastfeeding education materials were included. Most hospitals used both traditional sexed and inclusive language (69%, <i>n</i> = 77), followed by only traditional language (31%, <i>n</i> = 35). None of the hospitals used solely gender-identity inclusive language. One hospital provided material \"intended for LGBTQI+\" populations. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Education materials provided by hospitals for breastfeeding do not utilize gender-identity inclusive language As such, there remains uncertainty and hesitancy on how to provide appropriate breastfeeding education for all persons who identify as transgender and/or non-binary, yet choose or are able to breastfeed. Further research in this area could ascertain the impacts of using gender-identity inclusive language in breastfeeding education materials for the general, transgender, or non-binary populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":9142,"journal":{"name":"Breastfeeding Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Gender-Identity Inclusive Language Used in U.S. Hospital Breastfeeding Education Materials.\",\"authors\":\"Aria Grabowski, Sophie Branham, Olivia S Anderson\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/bfm.2024.0166\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Purpose:</i></b> To assess the use of gender-identity inclusive language in breastfeeding education materials publicly available on U.S. Hospital websites. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Hospitals were identified through the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists website. Breastfeeding education materials were searched online at each hospital. The first breastfeeding material on each website was used for our evaluation. Gender-identity inclusive versus traditional sexed language terms were curated <i>a priori</i> by referencing the National Institutes of Health and American Psychological Associations' guidelines. Education materials were categorized into: (1) \\\"gender-identity inclusive language,\\\" (2) \\\"mix of inclusive and traditional sexed language,\\\" or (3) \\\"traditional sexed language.\\\" Frequencies of the type of language and specific gender-related terms were calculated. <b><i>Results:</i></b> In total, <i>n</i> = 112 hospitals with publicly available breastfeeding education materials were included. Most hospitals used both traditional sexed and inclusive language (69%, <i>n</i> = 77), followed by only traditional language (31%, <i>n</i> = 35). None of the hospitals used solely gender-identity inclusive language. One hospital provided material \\\"intended for LGBTQI+\\\" populations. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Education materials provided by hospitals for breastfeeding do not utilize gender-identity inclusive language As such, there remains uncertainty and hesitancy on how to provide appropriate breastfeeding education for all persons who identify as transgender and/or non-binary, yet choose or are able to breastfeed. Further research in this area could ascertain the impacts of using gender-identity inclusive language in breastfeeding education materials for the general, transgender, or non-binary populations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9142,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Breastfeeding Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Breastfeeding Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/bfm.2024.0166\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breastfeeding Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/bfm.2024.0166","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估美国医院网站上公开的母乳喂养教育材料中性别认同包容性语言的使用情况。方法:通过美国妇产科医师学会网站确定医院。在每家医院的网上搜索母乳喂养教育资料。我们使用每个网站上的第一份母乳喂养资料进行评估。通过参考美国国立卫生研究院和美国心理学会的指导原则,我们对性别认同包容性语言术语和传统性别语言术语进行了预先筛选。教育材料被分为:(1) "性别认同包容性语言",(2) "包容性和传统性别语言的混合",或 (3) "传统性别语言"。计算了语言类型和特定性别相关术语的频率。结果:共有 n = 112 家医院公开了母乳喂养教育材料。大多数医院同时使用传统性别语言和包容性语言(69%,n = 77),其次是仅使用传统语言(31%,n = 35)。没有一家医院只使用性别认同包容性语言。一家医院提供了 "针对 LGBTQI+ "人群的材料。结论医院提供的母乳喂养教育材料未使用性别认同包容性语言 因此,如何为所有变性人和/或非二元性身份者提供适当的母乳喂养教育,仍存在不确定性和犹豫不决的问题。该领域的进一步研究可以确定在母乳喂养教育材料中使用性别认同包容性语言对普通人群、变性人或非二元人群的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of Gender-Identity Inclusive Language Used in U.S. Hospital Breastfeeding Education Materials.

Purpose: To assess the use of gender-identity inclusive language in breastfeeding education materials publicly available on U.S. Hospital websites. Methods: Hospitals were identified through the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists website. Breastfeeding education materials were searched online at each hospital. The first breastfeeding material on each website was used for our evaluation. Gender-identity inclusive versus traditional sexed language terms were curated a priori by referencing the National Institutes of Health and American Psychological Associations' guidelines. Education materials were categorized into: (1) "gender-identity inclusive language," (2) "mix of inclusive and traditional sexed language," or (3) "traditional sexed language." Frequencies of the type of language and specific gender-related terms were calculated. Results: In total, n = 112 hospitals with publicly available breastfeeding education materials were included. Most hospitals used both traditional sexed and inclusive language (69%, n = 77), followed by only traditional language (31%, n = 35). None of the hospitals used solely gender-identity inclusive language. One hospital provided material "intended for LGBTQI+" populations. Conclusion: Education materials provided by hospitals for breastfeeding do not utilize gender-identity inclusive language As such, there remains uncertainty and hesitancy on how to provide appropriate breastfeeding education for all persons who identify as transgender and/or non-binary, yet choose or are able to breastfeed. Further research in this area could ascertain the impacts of using gender-identity inclusive language in breastfeeding education materials for the general, transgender, or non-binary populations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Breastfeeding Medicine
Breastfeeding Medicine OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-PEDIATRICS
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
11.10%
发文量
130
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Breastfeeding Medicine provides unparalleled peer-reviewed research, protocols, and clinical applications to ensure optimal care for mother and infant. The Journal answers the growing demand for evidence-based research and explores the immediate and long-term outcomes of breastfeeding, including its epidemiologic, physiologic, and psychological benefits. It is the exclusive source of the Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine protocols. Breastfeeding Medicine coverage includes: Breastfeeding recommendations and protocols Health consequences of artificial feeding Physiology of lactation and biochemistry of breast milk Optimal nutrition for the breastfeeding mother Breastfeeding indications and contraindications Managing breastfeeding discomfort, pain, and other complications Breastfeeding the premature or sick infant Breastfeeding in the chronically ill mother Management of the breastfeeding mother on medication Infectious disease transmission through breast milk and breastfeeding The collection and storage of human milk and human milk banking Measuring the impact of being a “baby-friendly” hospital Cultural competence and cultural sensitivity International public health issues including social and economic issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信