利用基于 HEK 细胞的 COMET 试验鉴定格列美脲和甘布脲的强制降解产物并进行体外遗传毒性评估。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q4 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Riya Jain, Dande Aishwarya, Shrutika Wankhade,  Anupriya, Murali Kumarasamy, Ramalingam Peraman
{"title":"利用基于 HEK 细胞的 COMET 试验鉴定格列美脲和甘布脲的强制降解产物并进行体外遗传毒性评估。","authors":"Riya Jain,&nbsp;Dande Aishwarya,&nbsp;Shrutika Wankhade,&nbsp; Anupriya,&nbsp;Murali Kumarasamy,&nbsp;Ramalingam Peraman","doi":"10.1002/bmc.6025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study focuses on characterizing the forced degradation products of antidiabetic drugs glimepiride (GMD) and glyburide (GBD), with previously unexplored genotoxicity. Drugs underwent stress induced by acid, base, and hydrogen peroxide. For GMD, impurities were profiled and isolated using Hypersil Gold C8 (250 × 10 mm, 5 μ) through semi-preparative HPLC with a fraction collector. For GBD, impurity profiling was performed using semi-preparative HPLC (Hypersil GOLD C18, 250 × 10 mm, 5 μ), and reverse-phase flash chromatography (FP ECOFLEX C18 4 g column) for isolation. Although five GMD and three GBD impurities were detected, only three GMD and two GBD impurities were separated and assessed for purity using analytical RP-HPLC with the purity percentages ranging from 96.6% to 99.9%. LC-Orbitrap MS was used to identify these three GMD impurities (m/z: 408.122, 338.340, 381.160) and two GBD impurities (m/z: 369.065, 325.283). ProTox-II in silico predictions classified all impurities as class 4 and 5, with no positive genotoxicity indications. In vitro comet assays, using HEK cells, indicated that for GMD, impurity 2 and impurity 5 were less genotoxic, whereas impurity 4 exhibited genotoxicity. For GBD, both impurities 1 and 3 were found to be genotoxic, with impurity 3 showing a higher level of genotoxicity than impurity 1.</p>","PeriodicalId":8861,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical Chromatography","volume":"38 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identification and in vitro genotoxicity assessment of forced degradation products of glimepiride and glyburide using HEK cell-based COMET assay\",\"authors\":\"Riya Jain,&nbsp;Dande Aishwarya,&nbsp;Shrutika Wankhade,&nbsp; Anupriya,&nbsp;Murali Kumarasamy,&nbsp;Ramalingam Peraman\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/bmc.6025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This study focuses on characterizing the forced degradation products of antidiabetic drugs glimepiride (GMD) and glyburide (GBD), with previously unexplored genotoxicity. Drugs underwent stress induced by acid, base, and hydrogen peroxide. For GMD, impurities were profiled and isolated using Hypersil Gold C8 (250 × 10 mm, 5 μ) through semi-preparative HPLC with a fraction collector. For GBD, impurity profiling was performed using semi-preparative HPLC (Hypersil GOLD C18, 250 × 10 mm, 5 μ), and reverse-phase flash chromatography (FP ECOFLEX C18 4 g column) for isolation. Although five GMD and three GBD impurities were detected, only three GMD and two GBD impurities were separated and assessed for purity using analytical RP-HPLC with the purity percentages ranging from 96.6% to 99.9%. LC-Orbitrap MS was used to identify these three GMD impurities (m/z: 408.122, 338.340, 381.160) and two GBD impurities (m/z: 369.065, 325.283). ProTox-II in silico predictions classified all impurities as class 4 and 5, with no positive genotoxicity indications. In vitro comet assays, using HEK cells, indicated that for GMD, impurity 2 and impurity 5 were less genotoxic, whereas impurity 4 exhibited genotoxicity. For GBD, both impurities 1 and 3 were found to be genotoxic, with impurity 3 showing a higher level of genotoxicity than impurity 1.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8861,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biomedical Chromatography\",\"volume\":\"38 12\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biomedical Chromatography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bmc.6025\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical Chromatography","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bmc.6025","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的重点是分析抗糖尿病药物格列美脲(GMD)和甘布脲(GBD)的强制降解产物的特征,这些降解产物具有以前未曾探索过的遗传毒性。药物在酸、碱和过氧化氢的作用下发生了应激反应。对于 GMD,使用 Hypersil Gold C8(250 × 10 mm,5 μ)和馏分收集器通过半制备 HPLC 分析和分离杂质。对于 GBD,使用半制备高效液相色谱(Hypersil GOLD C18,250 × 10 mm,5 μ)进行杂质分析,并使用反相闪蒸色谱(FP ECOFLEX C18 4 g 色谱柱)进行分离。虽然检测到了 5 个 GMD 和 3 个 GBD 杂质,但只有 3 个 GMD 和 2 个 GBD 杂质被分离出来,并使用分析型 RP-HPLC 进行了纯度评估,纯度范围为 96.6% 至 99.9%。LC-Orbitrap MS 用于鉴定这三种 GMD 杂质(m/z:408.122、338.340、381.160)和两种 GBD 杂质(m/z:369.065、325.283)。ProTox-II 硅预测将所有杂质划分为 4 级和 5 级,没有阳性遗传毒性指标。使用 HEK 细胞进行的体外彗星试验表明,对于 GMD,杂质 2 和杂质 5 的遗传毒性较低,而杂质 4 则具有遗传毒性。对于 GBD,杂质 1 和 3 都具有基因毒性,其中杂质 3 的基因毒性高于杂质 1。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Identification and in vitro genotoxicity assessment of forced degradation products of glimepiride and glyburide using HEK cell-based COMET assay

This study focuses on characterizing the forced degradation products of antidiabetic drugs glimepiride (GMD) and glyburide (GBD), with previously unexplored genotoxicity. Drugs underwent stress induced by acid, base, and hydrogen peroxide. For GMD, impurities were profiled and isolated using Hypersil Gold C8 (250 × 10 mm, 5 μ) through semi-preparative HPLC with a fraction collector. For GBD, impurity profiling was performed using semi-preparative HPLC (Hypersil GOLD C18, 250 × 10 mm, 5 μ), and reverse-phase flash chromatography (FP ECOFLEX C18 4 g column) for isolation. Although five GMD and three GBD impurities were detected, only three GMD and two GBD impurities were separated and assessed for purity using analytical RP-HPLC with the purity percentages ranging from 96.6% to 99.9%. LC-Orbitrap MS was used to identify these three GMD impurities (m/z: 408.122, 338.340, 381.160) and two GBD impurities (m/z: 369.065, 325.283). ProTox-II in silico predictions classified all impurities as class 4 and 5, with no positive genotoxicity indications. In vitro comet assays, using HEK cells, indicated that for GMD, impurity 2 and impurity 5 were less genotoxic, whereas impurity 4 exhibited genotoxicity. For GBD, both impurities 1 and 3 were found to be genotoxic, with impurity 3 showing a higher level of genotoxicity than impurity 1.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biomedical Chromatography
Biomedical Chromatography 生物-分析化学
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.60%
发文量
268
审稿时长
2.3 months
期刊介绍: Biomedical Chromatography is devoted to the publication of original papers on the applications of chromatography and allied techniques in the biological and medical sciences. Research papers and review articles cover the methods and techniques relevant to the separation, identification and determination of substances in biochemistry, biotechnology, molecular biology, cell biology, clinical chemistry, pharmacology and related disciplines. These include the analysis of body fluids, cells and tissues, purification of biologically important compounds, pharmaco-kinetics and sequencing methods using HPLC, GC, HPLC-MS, TLC, paper chromatography, affinity chromatography, gel filtration, electrophoresis and related techniques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信