{"title":"利用基于 HEK 细胞的 COMET 试验鉴定格列美脲和甘布脲的强制降解产物并进行体外遗传毒性评估。","authors":"Riya Jain, Dande Aishwarya, Shrutika Wankhade, Anupriya, Murali Kumarasamy, Ramalingam Peraman","doi":"10.1002/bmc.6025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study focuses on characterizing the forced degradation products of antidiabetic drugs glimepiride (GMD) and glyburide (GBD), with previously unexplored genotoxicity. Drugs underwent stress induced by acid, base, and hydrogen peroxide. For GMD, impurities were profiled and isolated using Hypersil Gold C8 (250 × 10 mm, 5 μ) through semi-preparative HPLC with a fraction collector. For GBD, impurity profiling was performed using semi-preparative HPLC (Hypersil GOLD C18, 250 × 10 mm, 5 μ), and reverse-phase flash chromatography (FP ECOFLEX C18 4 g column) for isolation. Although five GMD and three GBD impurities were detected, only three GMD and two GBD impurities were separated and assessed for purity using analytical RP-HPLC with the purity percentages ranging from 96.6% to 99.9%. LC-Orbitrap MS was used to identify these three GMD impurities (m/z: 408.122, 338.340, 381.160) and two GBD impurities (m/z: 369.065, 325.283). ProTox-II in silico predictions classified all impurities as class 4 and 5, with no positive genotoxicity indications. In vitro comet assays, using HEK cells, indicated that for GMD, impurity 2 and impurity 5 were less genotoxic, whereas impurity 4 exhibited genotoxicity. For GBD, both impurities 1 and 3 were found to be genotoxic, with impurity 3 showing a higher level of genotoxicity than impurity 1.</p>","PeriodicalId":8861,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical Chromatography","volume":"38 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identification and in vitro genotoxicity assessment of forced degradation products of glimepiride and glyburide using HEK cell-based COMET assay\",\"authors\":\"Riya Jain, Dande Aishwarya, Shrutika Wankhade, Anupriya, Murali Kumarasamy, Ramalingam Peraman\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/bmc.6025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This study focuses on characterizing the forced degradation products of antidiabetic drugs glimepiride (GMD) and glyburide (GBD), with previously unexplored genotoxicity. Drugs underwent stress induced by acid, base, and hydrogen peroxide. For GMD, impurities were profiled and isolated using Hypersil Gold C8 (250 × 10 mm, 5 μ) through semi-preparative HPLC with a fraction collector. For GBD, impurity profiling was performed using semi-preparative HPLC (Hypersil GOLD C18, 250 × 10 mm, 5 μ), and reverse-phase flash chromatography (FP ECOFLEX C18 4 g column) for isolation. Although five GMD and three GBD impurities were detected, only three GMD and two GBD impurities were separated and assessed for purity using analytical RP-HPLC with the purity percentages ranging from 96.6% to 99.9%. LC-Orbitrap MS was used to identify these three GMD impurities (m/z: 408.122, 338.340, 381.160) and two GBD impurities (m/z: 369.065, 325.283). ProTox-II in silico predictions classified all impurities as class 4 and 5, with no positive genotoxicity indications. In vitro comet assays, using HEK cells, indicated that for GMD, impurity 2 and impurity 5 were less genotoxic, whereas impurity 4 exhibited genotoxicity. For GBD, both impurities 1 and 3 were found to be genotoxic, with impurity 3 showing a higher level of genotoxicity than impurity 1.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8861,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biomedical Chromatography\",\"volume\":\"38 12\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biomedical Chromatography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bmc.6025\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical Chromatography","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bmc.6025","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Identification and in vitro genotoxicity assessment of forced degradation products of glimepiride and glyburide using HEK cell-based COMET assay
This study focuses on characterizing the forced degradation products of antidiabetic drugs glimepiride (GMD) and glyburide (GBD), with previously unexplored genotoxicity. Drugs underwent stress induced by acid, base, and hydrogen peroxide. For GMD, impurities were profiled and isolated using Hypersil Gold C8 (250 × 10 mm, 5 μ) through semi-preparative HPLC with a fraction collector. For GBD, impurity profiling was performed using semi-preparative HPLC (Hypersil GOLD C18, 250 × 10 mm, 5 μ), and reverse-phase flash chromatography (FP ECOFLEX C18 4 g column) for isolation. Although five GMD and three GBD impurities were detected, only three GMD and two GBD impurities were separated and assessed for purity using analytical RP-HPLC with the purity percentages ranging from 96.6% to 99.9%. LC-Orbitrap MS was used to identify these three GMD impurities (m/z: 408.122, 338.340, 381.160) and two GBD impurities (m/z: 369.065, 325.283). ProTox-II in silico predictions classified all impurities as class 4 and 5, with no positive genotoxicity indications. In vitro comet assays, using HEK cells, indicated that for GMD, impurity 2 and impurity 5 were less genotoxic, whereas impurity 4 exhibited genotoxicity. For GBD, both impurities 1 and 3 were found to be genotoxic, with impurity 3 showing a higher level of genotoxicity than impurity 1.
期刊介绍:
Biomedical Chromatography is devoted to the publication of original papers on the applications of chromatography and allied techniques in the biological and medical sciences. Research papers and review articles cover the methods and techniques relevant to the separation, identification and determination of substances in biochemistry, biotechnology, molecular biology, cell biology, clinical chemistry, pharmacology and related disciplines. These include the analysis of body fluids, cells and tissues, purification of biologically important compounds, pharmaco-kinetics and sequencing methods using HPLC, GC, HPLC-MS, TLC, paper chromatography, affinity chromatography, gel filtration, electrophoresis and related techniques.