两个代理何时才能就量子测量结果达成一致?QBism 中的主体间协议。

IF 1.3 4区 物理与天体物理 Q3 PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Rüdiger Schack
{"title":"两个代理何时才能就量子测量结果达成一致?QBism 中的主体间协议。","authors":"Rüdiger Schack","doi":"10.1007/s10773-024-05790-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In the QBist approach to quantum mechanics, a measurement is an action an agent takes on the world external to herself. A measurement device is an extension of the agent and both measurement outcomes and their probabilities are personal to the agent. According to QBism, nothing in the quantum formalism implies that the quantum state assignments of two agents or their respective measurement outcomes need to be mutually consistent. Recently, Khrennikov has claimed that QBism’s personalist theory of quantum measurement is invalidated by Ozawa’s so-called intersubjectivity theorem. Here, following Stacey, we refute Khrennikov’s claim by showing that it is not Ozawa’s mathematical theorem but an additional assumption made by Khrennikov that QBism is incompatible with. We then address the question of intersubjective agreement in QBism more generally. Even though there is never a necessity for two agents to agree on their respective measurement outcomes, a QBist agent can strive to create conditions under which she would expect another agent’s reported measurement outcome to agree with hers. It turns out that the assumptions of Ozawa’s theorem provide an example for just such a condition.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":597,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Theoretical Physics","volume":"63 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11455726/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"When will Two Agents Agree on a Quantum Measurement Outcome? Intersubjective Agreement in QBism\",\"authors\":\"Rüdiger Schack\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10773-024-05790-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In the QBist approach to quantum mechanics, a measurement is an action an agent takes on the world external to herself. A measurement device is an extension of the agent and both measurement outcomes and their probabilities are personal to the agent. According to QBism, nothing in the quantum formalism implies that the quantum state assignments of two agents or their respective measurement outcomes need to be mutually consistent. Recently, Khrennikov has claimed that QBism’s personalist theory of quantum measurement is invalidated by Ozawa’s so-called intersubjectivity theorem. Here, following Stacey, we refute Khrennikov’s claim by showing that it is not Ozawa’s mathematical theorem but an additional assumption made by Khrennikov that QBism is incompatible with. We then address the question of intersubjective agreement in QBism more generally. Even though there is never a necessity for two agents to agree on their respective measurement outcomes, a QBist agent can strive to create conditions under which she would expect another agent’s reported measurement outcome to agree with hers. It turns out that the assumptions of Ozawa’s theorem provide an example for just such a condition.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":597,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Theoretical Physics\",\"volume\":\"63 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11455726/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Theoretical Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"101\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10773-024-05790-w\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Theoretical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10773-024-05790-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在量子力学的 QBist 方法中,测量是代理人对外部世界采取的行动。测量设备是代理的延伸,测量结果及其概率都是代理个人的。根据 QBism,量子形式主义中没有任何东西意味着两个代理的量子态分配或它们各自的测量结果需要相互一致。最近,赫伦尼科夫声称,小泽所谓的主体间性定理使 QBism 的量子测量个人主义理论失效。在此,我们继斯塔西之后反驳了赫伦尼科夫的说法,证明QB主义与之不相容的不是小泽的数学定理,而是赫伦尼科夫提出的一个额外假设。然后,我们将更广泛地讨论QB主义中的主体间一致问题。尽管两个代理人从来没有必要就各自的测量结果达成一致,但一个QB主义代理人可以努力创造条件,使她期望另一个代理人报告的测量结果与她的一致。事实证明,小泽定理的假设恰恰提供了这样一个条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
When will Two Agents Agree on a Quantum Measurement Outcome? Intersubjective Agreement in QBism

In the QBist approach to quantum mechanics, a measurement is an action an agent takes on the world external to herself. A measurement device is an extension of the agent and both measurement outcomes and their probabilities are personal to the agent. According to QBism, nothing in the quantum formalism implies that the quantum state assignments of two agents or their respective measurement outcomes need to be mutually consistent. Recently, Khrennikov has claimed that QBism’s personalist theory of quantum measurement is invalidated by Ozawa’s so-called intersubjectivity theorem. Here, following Stacey, we refute Khrennikov’s claim by showing that it is not Ozawa’s mathematical theorem but an additional assumption made by Khrennikov that QBism is incompatible with. We then address the question of intersubjective agreement in QBism more generally. Even though there is never a necessity for two agents to agree on their respective measurement outcomes, a QBist agent can strive to create conditions under which she would expect another agent’s reported measurement outcome to agree with hers. It turns out that the assumptions of Ozawa’s theorem provide an example for just such a condition.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
21.40%
发文量
258
审稿时长
3.3 months
期刊介绍: International Journal of Theoretical Physics publishes original research and reviews in theoretical physics and neighboring fields. Dedicated to the unification of the latest physics research, this journal seeks to map the direction of future research by original work in traditional physics like general relativity, quantum theory with relativistic quantum field theory,as used in particle physics, and by fresh inquiry into quantum measurement theory, and other similarly fundamental areas, e.g. quantum geometry and quantum logic, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信