利用 ID-LC-MS/MS 的括号校准法优化血清地高辛参考测量程序的临床应用。

IF 3.8 2区 化学 Q1 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-09 DOI:10.1007/s00216-024-05587-0
Qiaofang Yan, Fei Huang, Chuyang Wang, Min Zhan, Qiaoxuan Zhang, Di Huang, Jun Yan, Haibiao Lin, Xianzhang Huang, Liqiao Han
{"title":"利用 ID-LC-MS/MS 的括号校准法优化血清地高辛参考测量程序的临床应用。","authors":"Qiaofang Yan, Fei Huang, Chuyang Wang, Min Zhan, Qiaoxuan Zhang, Di Huang, Jun Yan, Haibiao Lin, Xianzhang Huang, Liqiao Han","doi":"10.1007/s00216-024-05587-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Digoxin, a cardiac glycoside, is widely used in the treatment of cardiovascular diseases. Due to its narrow therapeutic range, precise monitoring of its blood concentration is essential. A reference measurement procedure (RMP) is pivotal for ensuring result accuracy and comparability. The RMP for serum digoxin by ID-LC-MS/MS was optimized with sample pre-treatment and detection processes, and the bracketing calibration method was used, which facilitates more accurate measurement, especially for extreme concentrations. The performance of this optimized RMP was thoroughly evaluated. The limit of detection (LoD) was 0.05 ng/mL (0.06 nmol/L) and the lowest limit of quantification (LLoQ) was 0.10 ng/mL (0.13 nmol/L). The intra- and inter-assay imprecisions were 2.24%, 2.51%, 1.40% and 1.72%, 1.65%, 0.97% at 0.5, 2.0, 5.0 ng/mL, respectively. Recoveries were 99.63 to 101.42% and the linear response ranged from 0.1 to 10.0 ng/mL. The relative bias was 0.41% and 2.00% of our results compared with the median of all participating reference laboratories for IFCC-RELA (External Quality Assessment Scheme for Reference Laboratories in Laboratory Medicine) 2023A and 2023B. The uncertainty, calibration and measurement capability (CMC) of this method were also evaluated. The optimized RMP was applied in the Trueness Verification Plan of Southern China, which indicates significant differences among clinical systems, highlighting the need for standardization efforts. In addition, two commonly used clinical systems which employed immunoassay methods were compared with this optimized RMP, and 26 individual serum samples were analyzed. The good correlations indicate the feasibility of standardization for serum digoxin. The optimized RMP serves as an accurate reference baseline for routine methods, aiming to enhance the accuracy and precision of measurements in clinical laboratories.</p>","PeriodicalId":462,"journal":{"name":"Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry","volume":" ","pages":"6909-6918"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical application of an optimized reference measurement procedure for serum digoxin using bracketing calibration method by ID-LC-MS/MS.\",\"authors\":\"Qiaofang Yan, Fei Huang, Chuyang Wang, Min Zhan, Qiaoxuan Zhang, Di Huang, Jun Yan, Haibiao Lin, Xianzhang Huang, Liqiao Han\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00216-024-05587-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Digoxin, a cardiac glycoside, is widely used in the treatment of cardiovascular diseases. Due to its narrow therapeutic range, precise monitoring of its blood concentration is essential. A reference measurement procedure (RMP) is pivotal for ensuring result accuracy and comparability. The RMP for serum digoxin by ID-LC-MS/MS was optimized with sample pre-treatment and detection processes, and the bracketing calibration method was used, which facilitates more accurate measurement, especially for extreme concentrations. The performance of this optimized RMP was thoroughly evaluated. The limit of detection (LoD) was 0.05 ng/mL (0.06 nmol/L) and the lowest limit of quantification (LLoQ) was 0.10 ng/mL (0.13 nmol/L). The intra- and inter-assay imprecisions were 2.24%, 2.51%, 1.40% and 1.72%, 1.65%, 0.97% at 0.5, 2.0, 5.0 ng/mL, respectively. Recoveries were 99.63 to 101.42% and the linear response ranged from 0.1 to 10.0 ng/mL. The relative bias was 0.41% and 2.00% of our results compared with the median of all participating reference laboratories for IFCC-RELA (External Quality Assessment Scheme for Reference Laboratories in Laboratory Medicine) 2023A and 2023B. The uncertainty, calibration and measurement capability (CMC) of this method were also evaluated. The optimized RMP was applied in the Trueness Verification Plan of Southern China, which indicates significant differences among clinical systems, highlighting the need for standardization efforts. In addition, two commonly used clinical systems which employed immunoassay methods were compared with this optimized RMP, and 26 individual serum samples were analyzed. The good correlations indicate the feasibility of standardization for serum digoxin. The optimized RMP serves as an accurate reference baseline for routine methods, aiming to enhance the accuracy and precision of measurements in clinical laboratories.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":462,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"6909-6918\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-024-05587-0\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-024-05587-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

地高辛是一种强心苷,被广泛用于治疗心血管疾病。由于地高辛的治疗范围较窄,因此必须对其血液浓度进行精确监测。参考测量程序(RMP)对于确保结果的准确性和可比性至关重要。通过 ID-LC-MS/MS 对血清地高辛的参考测量程序进行了优化,包括样品预处理和检测过程,并采用了括号校准法,这有助于提高测量的准确性,尤其是对极高浓度的测量。对优化后的 RMP 性能进行了全面评估。检测限(LoD)为 0.05 纳克/毫升(0.06 毫摩尔/升),最低定量限(LLoQ)为 0.10 纳克/毫升(0.13 毫摩尔/升)。在 0.5、2.0 和 5.0 纳克/毫升时,测定内和测定间的不精确度分别为 2.24%、2.51%、1.40% 和 1.72%、1.65%、0.97%。回收率为 99.63% 至 101.42%,线性反应范围为 0.1 至 10.0 纳克/毫升。与所有参与 IFCC-RELA(检验医学参考实验室外部质量评估计划)2023A 和 2023B 的参考实验室的中位数相比,我们的结果的相对偏差分别为 0.41% 和 2.00%。此外,还对该方法的不确定性、校准和测量能力(CMC)进行了评估。优化后的 RMP 被应用于华南地区的真实性验证计划,结果表明不同临床系统之间存在显著差异,凸显了标准化工作的必要性。此外,还将两种临床常用的免疫测定方法与优化后的 RMP 进行了比较,并对 26 份血清样本进行了分析。良好的相关性表明了血清地高辛标准化的可行性。优化后的 RMP 可作为常规方法的准确参考基线,从而提高临床实验室测量的准确性和精确度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical application of an optimized reference measurement procedure for serum digoxin using bracketing calibration method by ID-LC-MS/MS.

Digoxin, a cardiac glycoside, is widely used in the treatment of cardiovascular diseases. Due to its narrow therapeutic range, precise monitoring of its blood concentration is essential. A reference measurement procedure (RMP) is pivotal for ensuring result accuracy and comparability. The RMP for serum digoxin by ID-LC-MS/MS was optimized with sample pre-treatment and detection processes, and the bracketing calibration method was used, which facilitates more accurate measurement, especially for extreme concentrations. The performance of this optimized RMP was thoroughly evaluated. The limit of detection (LoD) was 0.05 ng/mL (0.06 nmol/L) and the lowest limit of quantification (LLoQ) was 0.10 ng/mL (0.13 nmol/L). The intra- and inter-assay imprecisions were 2.24%, 2.51%, 1.40% and 1.72%, 1.65%, 0.97% at 0.5, 2.0, 5.0 ng/mL, respectively. Recoveries were 99.63 to 101.42% and the linear response ranged from 0.1 to 10.0 ng/mL. The relative bias was 0.41% and 2.00% of our results compared with the median of all participating reference laboratories for IFCC-RELA (External Quality Assessment Scheme for Reference Laboratories in Laboratory Medicine) 2023A and 2023B. The uncertainty, calibration and measurement capability (CMC) of this method were also evaluated. The optimized RMP was applied in the Trueness Verification Plan of Southern China, which indicates significant differences among clinical systems, highlighting the need for standardization efforts. In addition, two commonly used clinical systems which employed immunoassay methods were compared with this optimized RMP, and 26 individual serum samples were analyzed. The good correlations indicate the feasibility of standardization for serum digoxin. The optimized RMP serves as an accurate reference baseline for routine methods, aiming to enhance the accuracy and precision of measurements in clinical laboratories.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
4.70%
发文量
638
审稿时长
2.1 months
期刊介绍: Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry’s mission is the rapid publication of excellent and high-impact research articles on fundamental and applied topics of analytical and bioanalytical measurement science. Its scope is broad, and ranges from novel measurement platforms and their characterization to multidisciplinary approaches that effectively address important scientific problems. The Editors encourage submissions presenting innovative analytical research in concept, instrumentation, methods, and/or applications, including: mass spectrometry, spectroscopy, and electroanalysis; advanced separations; analytical strategies in “-omics” and imaging, bioanalysis, and sampling; miniaturized devices, medical diagnostics, sensors; analytical characterization of nano- and biomaterials; chemometrics and advanced data analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信