Nina M M Peltokallio, Rubina Ajdary, Guillermo Reyes, Esko Kankuri, Jouni J T Junnila, Satu Kuure, Anna S Meller, Jani Kuula, Eija Raussi-Lehto, Hannu Sariola, Outi M Laitinen-Vapaavuori, Orlando J Rojas
{"title":"在皮下移植模型中比较纤维素衍生网片和合成网片的体内生物相容性","authors":"Nina M M Peltokallio, Rubina Ajdary, Guillermo Reyes, Esko Kankuri, Jouni J T Junnila, Satu Kuure, Anna S Meller, Jani Kuula, Eija Raussi-Lehto, Hannu Sariola, Outi M Laitinen-Vapaavuori, Orlando J Rojas","doi":"10.1021/acs.biomac.4c00984","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite the increasing interest in cellulose-derived materials in biomedical research, there remains a significant gap in comprehensive <i>in vivo</i> analyses of cellulosic materials obtained from various sources and processing methods. To explore durable alternatives to synthetic medical meshes, we evaluated the <i>in vivo</i> biocompatibility of bacterial nanocellulose, regenerated cellulose, and cellulose nanofibrils in a subcutaneous transplantation model, alongside incumbent polypropylene and polydioxanone. Notably, this study demonstrates the <i>in vivo</i> biocompatibility of regenerated cellulose obtained through alkali dissolution and subsequent regeneration. All cellulose-derived implants triggered the expected foreign body response in the host tissue, characterized predominantly by macrophages and foreign body giant cells. Porous materials promoted cell ingrowth and biointegration. Our results highlight the potential of bacterial nanocellulose and regenerated cellulose as safe alternatives to commercial polypropylene meshes. However, the <i>in vivo</i> fragmentation observed for cellulose nanofibril meshes suggests the need for measures to optimize their processing and preparation.</p>","PeriodicalId":30,"journal":{"name":"Biomacromolecules","volume":" ","pages":"7298-7310"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11558565/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative <i>In Vivo</i> Biocompatibility of Cellulose-Derived and Synthetic Meshes in Subcutaneous Transplantation Models.\",\"authors\":\"Nina M M Peltokallio, Rubina Ajdary, Guillermo Reyes, Esko Kankuri, Jouni J T Junnila, Satu Kuure, Anna S Meller, Jani Kuula, Eija Raussi-Lehto, Hannu Sariola, Outi M Laitinen-Vapaavuori, Orlando J Rojas\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acs.biomac.4c00984\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Despite the increasing interest in cellulose-derived materials in biomedical research, there remains a significant gap in comprehensive <i>in vivo</i> analyses of cellulosic materials obtained from various sources and processing methods. To explore durable alternatives to synthetic medical meshes, we evaluated the <i>in vivo</i> biocompatibility of bacterial nanocellulose, regenerated cellulose, and cellulose nanofibrils in a subcutaneous transplantation model, alongside incumbent polypropylene and polydioxanone. Notably, this study demonstrates the <i>in vivo</i> biocompatibility of regenerated cellulose obtained through alkali dissolution and subsequent regeneration. All cellulose-derived implants triggered the expected foreign body response in the host tissue, characterized predominantly by macrophages and foreign body giant cells. Porous materials promoted cell ingrowth and biointegration. Our results highlight the potential of bacterial nanocellulose and regenerated cellulose as safe alternatives to commercial polypropylene meshes. However, the <i>in vivo</i> fragmentation observed for cellulose nanofibril meshes suggests the need for measures to optimize their processing and preparation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":30,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biomacromolecules\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"7298-7310\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11558565/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biomacromolecules\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"88\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.4c00984\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomacromolecules","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.4c00984","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparative In Vivo Biocompatibility of Cellulose-Derived and Synthetic Meshes in Subcutaneous Transplantation Models.
Despite the increasing interest in cellulose-derived materials in biomedical research, there remains a significant gap in comprehensive in vivo analyses of cellulosic materials obtained from various sources and processing methods. To explore durable alternatives to synthetic medical meshes, we evaluated the in vivo biocompatibility of bacterial nanocellulose, regenerated cellulose, and cellulose nanofibrils in a subcutaneous transplantation model, alongside incumbent polypropylene and polydioxanone. Notably, this study demonstrates the in vivo biocompatibility of regenerated cellulose obtained through alkali dissolution and subsequent regeneration. All cellulose-derived implants triggered the expected foreign body response in the host tissue, characterized predominantly by macrophages and foreign body giant cells. Porous materials promoted cell ingrowth and biointegration. Our results highlight the potential of bacterial nanocellulose and regenerated cellulose as safe alternatives to commercial polypropylene meshes. However, the in vivo fragmentation observed for cellulose nanofibril meshes suggests the need for measures to optimize their processing and preparation.
期刊介绍:
Biomacromolecules is a leading forum for the dissemination of cutting-edge research at the interface of polymer science and biology. Submissions to Biomacromolecules should contain strong elements of innovation in terms of macromolecular design, synthesis and characterization, or in the application of polymer materials to biology and medicine.
Topics covered by Biomacromolecules include, but are not exclusively limited to: sustainable polymers, polymers based on natural and renewable resources, degradable polymers, polymer conjugates, polymeric drugs, polymers in biocatalysis, biomacromolecular assembly, biomimetic polymers, polymer-biomineral hybrids, biomimetic-polymer processing, polymer recycling, bioactive polymer surfaces, original polymer design for biomedical applications such as immunotherapy, drug delivery, gene delivery, antimicrobial applications, diagnostic imaging and biosensing, polymers in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine, polymeric scaffolds and hydrogels for cell culture and delivery.