挑战现状,提高临床前肿瘤学研究的转化潜力

IF 72.5 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Kate Connor, Anna Golebiewska, Annette T. Byrne
{"title":"挑战现状,提高临床前肿瘤学研究的转化潜力","authors":"Kate Connor, Anna Golebiewska, Annette T. Byrne","doi":"10.1038/s41568-024-00756-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The precision medicine era has precipitated inherent new challenges to the preclinical tumour biology field. Overall, continued poor clinical translatability of preclinical studies highlights the need to disrupt the status quo. Well-characterized models, ideally established in the orthotopic setting and, where feasible, treated with classical standard-of-care regimens, are mandated. In this Comment, Connor et al. discuss how the continued poor clinical translatability of preclinical studies highlights the need to mandate well-characterized models, ideally established in the orthotopic setting and, where feasible, treated with classical standard-of-care regimens.","PeriodicalId":19055,"journal":{"name":"Nature Reviews Cancer","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":72.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Challenging the status quo to improve the translational potential of preclinical oncology studies\",\"authors\":\"Kate Connor, Anna Golebiewska, Annette T. Byrne\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41568-024-00756-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The precision medicine era has precipitated inherent new challenges to the preclinical tumour biology field. Overall, continued poor clinical translatability of preclinical studies highlights the need to disrupt the status quo. Well-characterized models, ideally established in the orthotopic setting and, where feasible, treated with classical standard-of-care regimens, are mandated. In this Comment, Connor et al. discuss how the continued poor clinical translatability of preclinical studies highlights the need to mandate well-characterized models, ideally established in the orthotopic setting and, where feasible, treated with classical standard-of-care regimens.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19055,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nature Reviews Cancer\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":72.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nature Reviews Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41568-024-00756-w\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Reviews Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41568-024-00756-w","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

精准医疗时代给临床前肿瘤生物学领域带来了固有的新挑战。总体而言,临床前研究的临床转化率仍然很低,这凸显了打破现状的必要性。必须建立特征明确的模型,最好是在正位环境中建立,并在可行的情况下采用经典的标准治疗方案进行治疗。在这篇评论中,Connor 等人讨论了临床前研究的临床转化率持续低下如何凸显了要求建立特征明确的模型的必要性,这些模型最好在原位环境中建立,并在可行的情况下采用经典的标准护理方案进行治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Challenging the status quo to improve the translational potential of preclinical oncology studies
The precision medicine era has precipitated inherent new challenges to the preclinical tumour biology field. Overall, continued poor clinical translatability of preclinical studies highlights the need to disrupt the status quo. Well-characterized models, ideally established in the orthotopic setting and, where feasible, treated with classical standard-of-care regimens, are mandated. In this Comment, Connor et al. discuss how the continued poor clinical translatability of preclinical studies highlights the need to mandate well-characterized models, ideally established in the orthotopic setting and, where feasible, treated with classical standard-of-care regimens.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nature Reviews Cancer
Nature Reviews Cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
111.90
自引率
0.40%
发文量
97
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nature Reviews Cancer, a part of the Nature Reviews portfolio of journals, aims to be the premier source of reviews and commentaries for the scientific communities it serves. The correct abbreviation for abstracting and indexing purposes is Nat. Rev. Cancer. The international standard serial numbers (ISSN) for Nature Reviews Cancer are 1474-175X (print) and 1474-1768 (online). Unlike other journals, Nature Reviews Cancer does not have an external editorial board. Instead, all editorial decisions are made by a team of full-time professional editors who are PhD-level scientists. The journal publishes Research Highlights, Comments, Reviews, and Perspectives relevant to cancer researchers, ensuring that the articles reach the widest possible audience due to their broad scope.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信