为净零过渡提供信息的国家去碳化情景的用途和局限性

IF 38.6 1区 材料科学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL
Joule Pub Date : 2024-10-16 DOI:10.1016/j.joule.2024.09.005
John Bistline , Morgan Browning , Julianne DeAngelo , Daniel Huppmann , Ryan Jones , James McFarland , Anahi Molar-Cruz , Steven Rose , Steven J. Davis
{"title":"为净零过渡提供信息的国家去碳化情景的用途和局限性","authors":"John Bistline ,&nbsp;Morgan Browning ,&nbsp;Julianne DeAngelo ,&nbsp;Daniel Huppmann ,&nbsp;Ryan Jones ,&nbsp;James McFarland ,&nbsp;Anahi Molar-Cruz ,&nbsp;Steven Rose ,&nbsp;Steven J. Davis","doi":"10.1016/j.joule.2024.09.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Decarbonization scenario ensembles are increasingly used for policy design, company strategy, and stakeholder engagement. However, the limitations of these scenarios may not be adequately understood. We summarize the uses and challenges with applying decarbonization scenarios to inform policy and planning decisions by using a novel database of U.S. net-zero CO<sub>2</sub> emissions scenarios. Models agree that power sector emissions reductions, wind and solar deployment, end-use electrification, energy efficiency, and carbon removal help to reach economy-wide net-zero emissions; however, there is considerable variation in these changes, which may not be reflected in current third-party guidance or international pledges. We show how there is more regional variation in decarbonization pathways than national modeling indicates. The analysis also compares U.S. national scenarios with corresponding U.S. results from global models and finds that models can vary widely in their sectoral emissions reductions, use of carbon removal, and renewables deployment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":343,"journal":{"name":"Joule","volume":"8 10","pages":"Pages 2721-2726"},"PeriodicalIF":38.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Uses and limits of national decarbonization scenarios to inform net-zero transitions\",\"authors\":\"John Bistline ,&nbsp;Morgan Browning ,&nbsp;Julianne DeAngelo ,&nbsp;Daniel Huppmann ,&nbsp;Ryan Jones ,&nbsp;James McFarland ,&nbsp;Anahi Molar-Cruz ,&nbsp;Steven Rose ,&nbsp;Steven J. Davis\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.joule.2024.09.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Decarbonization scenario ensembles are increasingly used for policy design, company strategy, and stakeholder engagement. However, the limitations of these scenarios may not be adequately understood. We summarize the uses and challenges with applying decarbonization scenarios to inform policy and planning decisions by using a novel database of U.S. net-zero CO<sub>2</sub> emissions scenarios. Models agree that power sector emissions reductions, wind and solar deployment, end-use electrification, energy efficiency, and carbon removal help to reach economy-wide net-zero emissions; however, there is considerable variation in these changes, which may not be reflected in current third-party guidance or international pledges. We show how there is more regional variation in decarbonization pathways than national modeling indicates. The analysis also compares U.S. national scenarios with corresponding U.S. results from global models and finds that models can vary widely in their sectoral emissions reductions, use of carbon removal, and renewables deployment.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":343,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Joule\",\"volume\":\"8 10\",\"pages\":\"Pages 2721-2726\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":38.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Joule\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"88\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2542435124004239\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Joule","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2542435124004239","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在政策设计、公司战略和利益相关者参与方面,越来越多地使用脱碳情景组合。然而,人们可能对这些情景的局限性认识不足。我们利用一个新颖的美国二氧化碳净零排放情景数据库,总结了应用去碳化情景为政策和规划决策提供信息的用途和挑战。模型一致认为,电力部门减排、风能和太阳能部署、终端电气化、能源效率和碳清除有助于实现整个经济的净零排放;然而,这些变化存在相当大的差异,这可能没有反映在当前的第三方指导或国际承诺中。我们展示了去碳化途径的地区差异如何大于国家模型所显示的差异。分析还将美国的国家方案与全球模型中相应的美国结果进行了比较,发现模型在部门减排、碳清除的使用以及可再生能源的部署方面存在很大差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Uses and limits of national decarbonization scenarios to inform net-zero transitions
Decarbonization scenario ensembles are increasingly used for policy design, company strategy, and stakeholder engagement. However, the limitations of these scenarios may not be adequately understood. We summarize the uses and challenges with applying decarbonization scenarios to inform policy and planning decisions by using a novel database of U.S. net-zero CO2 emissions scenarios. Models agree that power sector emissions reductions, wind and solar deployment, end-use electrification, energy efficiency, and carbon removal help to reach economy-wide net-zero emissions; however, there is considerable variation in these changes, which may not be reflected in current third-party guidance or international pledges. We show how there is more regional variation in decarbonization pathways than national modeling indicates. The analysis also compares U.S. national scenarios with corresponding U.S. results from global models and finds that models can vary widely in their sectoral emissions reductions, use of carbon removal, and renewables deployment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Joule
Joule Energy-General Energy
CiteScore
53.10
自引率
2.00%
发文量
198
期刊介绍: Joule is a sister journal to Cell that focuses on research, analysis, and ideas related to sustainable energy. It aims to address the global challenge of the need for more sustainable energy solutions. Joule is a forward-looking journal that bridges disciplines and scales of energy research. It connects researchers and analysts working on scientific, technical, economic, policy, and social challenges related to sustainable energy. The journal covers a wide range of energy research, from fundamental laboratory studies on energy conversion and storage to global-level analysis. Joule aims to highlight and amplify the implications, challenges, and opportunities of novel energy research for different groups in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信