COVID-19 大流行初期的健康促进和预防:瑞士德尔菲研究的启示。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Andrea Lutz, Olivier Duperrex, Aude Gendre, Karin Zürcher
{"title":"COVID-19 大流行初期的健康促进和预防:瑞士德尔菲研究的启示。","authors":"Andrea Lutz, Olivier Duperrex, Aude Gendre, Karin Zürcher","doi":"10.1177/17579759241277116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>COVID-19 pandemic and confinement measures had a major impact on the health and well-being of the population. Health promotion and prevention (HP&P) professionals had to rethink their practices to respond to the challenges raised by the pandemic context. This study aimed to build a professional consensus on the HP&P priorities (apart from the COVID-19 fight) in the early times of the pandemic in Switzerland and to identify the most relevant interventions to respond to these issues.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>HP&P experts from the three main linguistic regions of Switzerland reached a consensus through a two-round Delphi methodology with online questionnaires in June-July and October-November, 2020. Out of 282 experts contacted, 121 (43%) contributed in the first round and 99 (35%) in the second.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A strong consensus emerged about the importance of tackling mental health problems, non-communicable diseases and their main risk factors, as well as multiple social determinants of health. Although they believed that HP&P priorities changed in this context, experts reported that professional practices had only partially adapted to this new context due to multiple constraints (political, strategic, financial). The experts noted the need to adapt the means of communication to reach the different target groups. They underlined the potential of communication via digital technologies, but also drew attention to the risk of widening social inequalities due to the unequal access to these resources.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study generated new insights and confirmed pre-established knowledge regarding the orientations the field of HP&P should follow. While stressing the need to consolidate the traditional missions of the field (i.e. the fight against non-communicable diseases and the actions on social determinants of health), experts surveyed in this study also revaluated health priorities and rethought the way of developing HP&P actions in this specific context of the early pandemic of COVID-19.</p>","PeriodicalId":46805,"journal":{"name":"Global Health Promotion","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Health promotion and prevention in early times of the COVID-19 pandemic: insights from a Delphi study in Switzerland.\",\"authors\":\"Andrea Lutz, Olivier Duperrex, Aude Gendre, Karin Zürcher\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17579759241277116\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>COVID-19 pandemic and confinement measures had a major impact on the health and well-being of the population. Health promotion and prevention (HP&P) professionals had to rethink their practices to respond to the challenges raised by the pandemic context. This study aimed to build a professional consensus on the HP&P priorities (apart from the COVID-19 fight) in the early times of the pandemic in Switzerland and to identify the most relevant interventions to respond to these issues.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>HP&P experts from the three main linguistic regions of Switzerland reached a consensus through a two-round Delphi methodology with online questionnaires in June-July and October-November, 2020. Out of 282 experts contacted, 121 (43%) contributed in the first round and 99 (35%) in the second.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A strong consensus emerged about the importance of tackling mental health problems, non-communicable diseases and their main risk factors, as well as multiple social determinants of health. Although they believed that HP&P priorities changed in this context, experts reported that professional practices had only partially adapted to this new context due to multiple constraints (political, strategic, financial). The experts noted the need to adapt the means of communication to reach the different target groups. They underlined the potential of communication via digital technologies, but also drew attention to the risk of widening social inequalities due to the unequal access to these resources.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study generated new insights and confirmed pre-established knowledge regarding the orientations the field of HP&P should follow. While stressing the need to consolidate the traditional missions of the field (i.e. the fight against non-communicable diseases and the actions on social determinants of health), experts surveyed in this study also revaluated health priorities and rethought the way of developing HP&P actions in this specific context of the early pandemic of COVID-19.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46805,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Health Promotion\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Health Promotion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17579759241277116\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Health Promotion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17579759241277116","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:COVID-19 大流行和禁闭措施对人口的健康和福祉产生了重大影响。健康促进与预防(HP&P)专业人员必须重新思考他们的做法,以应对大流行带来的挑战。本研究旨在就瑞士大流行初期的健康促进与预防优先事项(除 COVID-19 斗争外)达成专业共识,并确定应对这些问题的最相关干预措施。方法:来自瑞士三个主要语言地区的健康促进与预防专家于 2020 年 6 月至 7 月和 10 月至 11 月通过两轮德尔菲法在线问卷调查达成共识。在联系的 282 名专家中,121 人(43%)参与了第一轮,99 人(35%)参与了第二轮:结果:对于解决精神健康问题、非传染性疾病及其主要风险因素以及多种健康社会决定因素的重要性,专家们达成了强烈共识。尽管专家们认为,在这种情况下,保健和规划的优先事项发生了变化,但专家们报告说,由于多种限制因素(政治、战略、财政),专业做法仅部分适应了这一新情况。专家们指出,有必要调整传播手段,以覆盖不同的目标群体。他们强调了通过数字技术进行传播的潜力,但也提请注意由于获取这些资源的机会不均 等,有可能扩大社会不平等:这项研究提出了新的见解,并确认了关于人类发展和减贫领域应遵循的方向的已有知识。在强调有必要巩固该领域的传统使命(即防治非传染性疾病和针对健康的社会决定因素采取行动)的同时,本研究中接受调查的专家还重新评估了健康方面的优先事项,并重新思考了在 COVID-19 早期流行这一特定背景下开展 HP&P 行动的方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Health promotion and prevention in early times of the COVID-19 pandemic: insights from a Delphi study in Switzerland.

Background: COVID-19 pandemic and confinement measures had a major impact on the health and well-being of the population. Health promotion and prevention (HP&P) professionals had to rethink their practices to respond to the challenges raised by the pandemic context. This study aimed to build a professional consensus on the HP&P priorities (apart from the COVID-19 fight) in the early times of the pandemic in Switzerland and to identify the most relevant interventions to respond to these issues.

Methods: HP&P experts from the three main linguistic regions of Switzerland reached a consensus through a two-round Delphi methodology with online questionnaires in June-July and October-November, 2020. Out of 282 experts contacted, 121 (43%) contributed in the first round and 99 (35%) in the second.

Results: A strong consensus emerged about the importance of tackling mental health problems, non-communicable diseases and their main risk factors, as well as multiple social determinants of health. Although they believed that HP&P priorities changed in this context, experts reported that professional practices had only partially adapted to this new context due to multiple constraints (political, strategic, financial). The experts noted the need to adapt the means of communication to reach the different target groups. They underlined the potential of communication via digital technologies, but also drew attention to the risk of widening social inequalities due to the unequal access to these resources.

Conclusions: This study generated new insights and confirmed pre-established knowledge regarding the orientations the field of HP&P should follow. While stressing the need to consolidate the traditional missions of the field (i.e. the fight against non-communicable diseases and the actions on social determinants of health), experts surveyed in this study also revaluated health priorities and rethought the way of developing HP&P actions in this specific context of the early pandemic of COVID-19.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Health Promotion
Global Health Promotion PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.00%
发文量
71
期刊介绍: The journal aims to: ·publish academic content and commentaries of practical importance; ·provide an international and interdisciplinary forum for the dissemination and exchange of health promotion, health education and public health theory, research findings, practice and reviews; ·publish articles which ensure wide geographical coverage and are of general interest to an international readership; ·provide fair, supportive, efficient and high quality peer review and editorial handling of all submissions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信