Roli Dureha, Saumya Navit, Suleman A Khan, Pranshu Mathur
{"title":"市售儿童牙膏抗菌活性和最低抑菌浓度的比较评估:体外研究","authors":"Roli Dureha, Saumya Navit, Suleman A Khan, Pranshu Mathur","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2939","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate the antimicrobial efficacy and minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of commercially available pediatric dentifrices containing different compositions against <i>Streptococcus mutans</i> and <i>Lactobacillus</i> activity.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Four different commercially available brands of pediatric dentifrices, designated as sample I-fluoride, sample II-herbal, sample III-xylitol with nanosilver particles, and sample IV-xylitol with fluoride, along with two control groups (a positive control-ciprofloxacin and a negative control-distilled water), were tested for their antibacterial activity by measuring the zone of inhibition, followed by MIC against two dental bacterial pathogens, <i>S. mutans</i> strain and <i>Lactobacillus acidophilus (LB)</i> strain, at five different twofold dilutions of 100, 50, 25%, 12.5, and 6.25% concentrations.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>All four dentifrices were found to have wide variations in their effectiveness against the two tested microorganisms at 100% (pure) and 50% concentrations, with sample I having the highest activity, followed by sample IV and sample II. At 25% concentration, only sample I and sample IV showed antibacterial activity, while at 12.5 and 6.25% concentrations, none of the tested toothpastes exhibited any antibacterial activity. Sample III failed to show antibacterial activity even in pure form against the two microorganisms.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In our present study, the fluoride-containing pediatric dentifrice with a lower fluoride concentration (458 ppm) exhibited the highest zone of inhibition, followed by the xylitol with fluoride dentifrice and the herbal dentifrice. No zone of inhibition was observed in the nanosilver with xylitol dentifrice.</p><p><strong>How to cite this article: </strong>Dureha R, Navit S, Khan SA, <i>et al.</i> Comparative Evaluation of Antimicrobial Activity and Minimum Inhibitory Concentration of Commercially Available Pediatric Dentifrices: An <i>In Vitro</i> Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2024;17(8):938-944.</p>","PeriodicalId":36045,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry","volume":"17 8","pages":"938-944"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11451872/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Evaluation of Antimicrobial Activity and Minimum Inhibitory Concentration of Commercially Available Pediatric Dentifrices: An <i>In Vitro</i> Study.\",\"authors\":\"Roli Dureha, Saumya Navit, Suleman A Khan, Pranshu Mathur\",\"doi\":\"10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2939\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate the antimicrobial efficacy and minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of commercially available pediatric dentifrices containing different compositions against <i>Streptococcus mutans</i> and <i>Lactobacillus</i> activity.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Four different commercially available brands of pediatric dentifrices, designated as sample I-fluoride, sample II-herbal, sample III-xylitol with nanosilver particles, and sample IV-xylitol with fluoride, along with two control groups (a positive control-ciprofloxacin and a negative control-distilled water), were tested for their antibacterial activity by measuring the zone of inhibition, followed by MIC against two dental bacterial pathogens, <i>S. mutans</i> strain and <i>Lactobacillus acidophilus (LB)</i> strain, at five different twofold dilutions of 100, 50, 25%, 12.5, and 6.25% concentrations.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>All four dentifrices were found to have wide variations in their effectiveness against the two tested microorganisms at 100% (pure) and 50% concentrations, with sample I having the highest activity, followed by sample IV and sample II. At 25% concentration, only sample I and sample IV showed antibacterial activity, while at 12.5 and 6.25% concentrations, none of the tested toothpastes exhibited any antibacterial activity. Sample III failed to show antibacterial activity even in pure form against the two microorganisms.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In our present study, the fluoride-containing pediatric dentifrice with a lower fluoride concentration (458 ppm) exhibited the highest zone of inhibition, followed by the xylitol with fluoride dentifrice and the herbal dentifrice. No zone of inhibition was observed in the nanosilver with xylitol dentifrice.</p><p><strong>How to cite this article: </strong>Dureha R, Navit S, Khan SA, <i>et al.</i> Comparative Evaluation of Antimicrobial Activity and Minimum Inhibitory Concentration of Commercially Available Pediatric Dentifrices: An <i>In Vitro</i> Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2024;17(8):938-944.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36045,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry\",\"volume\":\"17 8\",\"pages\":\"938-944\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11451872/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2939\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2939","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:本研究旨在评估含有不同成分的市售儿童牙膏对变异链球菌和乳酸杆菌活性的抗菌效果和最低抑菌浓度(MIC):对四种不同品牌的市售儿童牙膏(分别为样品 I-氟化物、样品 II-草本、样品 III-含有纳米银颗粒的木糖醇和样品 IV-含有氟化物的木糖醇)以及两个对照组(阳性对照组-环丙沙星和阴性对照组-蒸馏水)进行了抗菌活性测试。结果:结果:在 100%(纯度)和 50%浓度下,所有四种牙膏对两种受测微生物的功效差异很大,其中样品 I 的活性最高,其次是样品 IV 和样品 II。在浓度为 25% 时,只有样品 I 和样品 IV 具有抗菌活性,而在浓度为 12.5% 和 6.25% 时,所有受测牙膏都没有抗菌活性。样品 III 即使是纯品也无法对两种微生物显示出抗菌活性:在本研究中,含氟浓度较低(458 ppm)的含氟儿童牙膏的抑菌区最大,其次是木糖醇含氟牙膏和草本牙膏。纳米银与木糖醇牙膏没有抑制区:Dureha R, Navit S, Khan SA, et al:体外研究。Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2024;17(8):938-944.
Comparative Evaluation of Antimicrobial Activity and Minimum Inhibitory Concentration of Commercially Available Pediatric Dentifrices: An In Vitro Study.
Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the antimicrobial efficacy and minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of commercially available pediatric dentifrices containing different compositions against Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus activity.
Materials and methods: Four different commercially available brands of pediatric dentifrices, designated as sample I-fluoride, sample II-herbal, sample III-xylitol with nanosilver particles, and sample IV-xylitol with fluoride, along with two control groups (a positive control-ciprofloxacin and a negative control-distilled water), were tested for their antibacterial activity by measuring the zone of inhibition, followed by MIC against two dental bacterial pathogens, S. mutans strain and Lactobacillus acidophilus (LB) strain, at five different twofold dilutions of 100, 50, 25%, 12.5, and 6.25% concentrations.
Result: All four dentifrices were found to have wide variations in their effectiveness against the two tested microorganisms at 100% (pure) and 50% concentrations, with sample I having the highest activity, followed by sample IV and sample II. At 25% concentration, only sample I and sample IV showed antibacterial activity, while at 12.5 and 6.25% concentrations, none of the tested toothpastes exhibited any antibacterial activity. Sample III failed to show antibacterial activity even in pure form against the two microorganisms.
Conclusion: In our present study, the fluoride-containing pediatric dentifrice with a lower fluoride concentration (458 ppm) exhibited the highest zone of inhibition, followed by the xylitol with fluoride dentifrice and the herbal dentifrice. No zone of inhibition was observed in the nanosilver with xylitol dentifrice.
How to cite this article: Dureha R, Navit S, Khan SA, et al. Comparative Evaluation of Antimicrobial Activity and Minimum Inhibitory Concentration of Commercially Available Pediatric Dentifrices: An In Vitro Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2024;17(8):938-944.