美国成年造血细胞移植幸存者常规再接种的障碍和促进因素:聚合混合方法分析。

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q3 IMMUNOLOGY
Mihkai Wickline, Paul A Carpenter, Jeffrey R Harris, Sarah J Iribarren, Kerryn W Reding, Kenneth C Pike, Stephanie J Lee, Rachel B Salit, Masumi Ueda Oshima, Phuong T Vo, Donna L Berry
{"title":"美国成年造血细胞移植幸存者常规再接种的障碍和促进因素:聚合混合方法分析。","authors":"Mihkai Wickline, Paul A Carpenter, Jeffrey R Harris, Sarah J Iribarren, Kerryn W Reding, Kenneth C Pike, Stephanie J Lee, Rachel B Salit, Masumi Ueda Oshima, Phuong T Vo, Donna L Berry","doi":"10.1111/tid.14388","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) survivorship care includes recommendations for post-HCT revaccination to restore immunity to vaccine-preventable diseases (VPDs). However, not all survivors agree to be vaccinated. No existing studies have comprehensively reported barriers and facilitators to adult HCT survivors completing revaccination.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey of 194 adult HCT survivors was analyzed using convergent mixed methods. The analysis used various statistical methods to determine the prevalence of barriers and facilitators and the association between revaccination and the number and specific type of barriers and facilitators. Content analysis was applied to open-ended item responses. Integrated analysis merged quantitative and qualitative findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The most frequent barriers included the inability to receive live vaccines because of immunosuppression, identifying a suitable community location for administering childhood vaccines to adults, and delayed immune recovery. The most frequent facilitators were having healthcare insurance and a clear calendar of the revaccination schedule. Complete revaccination rates were lower with each additional reported barrier (OR = 0.58; 95% CI 0.459-0.722) and higher with each additional reported facilitator (OR = 1.31; 95% CI 1.05-1.63). Content analysis suggested that most barriers were practical issues. One significant facilitator highlighted by respondents was for the transplant center to coordinate and serve as the vaccination location for revaccination services. Merged analysis indicated convergence between quantitative and qualitative data.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Practical barriers and facilitators played a consequential role in revaccination uptake, and survivors would like to be revaccinated at the transplant center.</p>","PeriodicalId":23318,"journal":{"name":"Transplant Infectious Disease","volume":" ","pages":"e14388"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Barriers and facilitators to routine revaccination among adult Hematopoietic Cell Transplant survivors in the United States: A convergent mixed methods analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Mihkai Wickline, Paul A Carpenter, Jeffrey R Harris, Sarah J Iribarren, Kerryn W Reding, Kenneth C Pike, Stephanie J Lee, Rachel B Salit, Masumi Ueda Oshima, Phuong T Vo, Donna L Berry\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/tid.14388\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) survivorship care includes recommendations for post-HCT revaccination to restore immunity to vaccine-preventable diseases (VPDs). However, not all survivors agree to be vaccinated. No existing studies have comprehensively reported barriers and facilitators to adult HCT survivors completing revaccination.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey of 194 adult HCT survivors was analyzed using convergent mixed methods. The analysis used various statistical methods to determine the prevalence of barriers and facilitators and the association between revaccination and the number and specific type of barriers and facilitators. Content analysis was applied to open-ended item responses. Integrated analysis merged quantitative and qualitative findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The most frequent barriers included the inability to receive live vaccines because of immunosuppression, identifying a suitable community location for administering childhood vaccines to adults, and delayed immune recovery. The most frequent facilitators were having healthcare insurance and a clear calendar of the revaccination schedule. Complete revaccination rates were lower with each additional reported barrier (OR = 0.58; 95% CI 0.459-0.722) and higher with each additional reported facilitator (OR = 1.31; 95% CI 1.05-1.63). Content analysis suggested that most barriers were practical issues. One significant facilitator highlighted by respondents was for the transplant center to coordinate and serve as the vaccination location for revaccination services. Merged analysis indicated convergence between quantitative and qualitative data.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Practical barriers and facilitators played a consequential role in revaccination uptake, and survivors would like to be revaccinated at the transplant center.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23318,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transplant Infectious Disease\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e14388\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transplant Infectious Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/tid.14388\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplant Infectious Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/tid.14388","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:造血细胞移植 (HCT) 幸存者护理包括建议在 HCT 后重新接种疫苗,以恢复对疫苗可预防疾病 (VPD) 的免疫力。然而,并非所有幸存者都同意接种疫苗。目前还没有研究全面报告成年 HCT 幸存者完成再接种的障碍和促进因素:采用聚合混合方法分析了对 194 名成年 HCT 幸存者进行的横断面调查。分析采用了多种统计方法,以确定障碍和促进因素的普遍程度,以及再接种与障碍和促进因素的数量和具体类型之间的关联。内容分析适用于开放式项目的回答。综合分析合并了定量和定性分析结果:最常见的障碍包括因免疫抑制而无法接种活疫苗、找不到合适的社区地点为成人接种儿童疫苗以及免疫力恢复延迟。最常见的促进因素是拥有医疗保险和明确的再接种日程表。每多报告一个障碍,完全再接种率就会降低(OR = 0.58; 95% CI 0.459-0.722),每多报告一个促进因素,完全再接种率就会升高(OR = 1.31; 95% CI 1.05-1.63)。内容分析表明,大多数障碍都是实际问题。受访者强调的一个重要促进因素是移植中心协调并充当再接种服务的接种地点。合并分析表明,定量和定性数据之间存在趋同性:结论:实际障碍和促进因素在重新接种疫苗中发挥了重要作用,幸存者希望在移植中心重新接种疫苗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Barriers and facilitators to routine revaccination among adult Hematopoietic Cell Transplant survivors in the United States: A convergent mixed methods analysis.

Background: Hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) survivorship care includes recommendations for post-HCT revaccination to restore immunity to vaccine-preventable diseases (VPDs). However, not all survivors agree to be vaccinated. No existing studies have comprehensively reported barriers and facilitators to adult HCT survivors completing revaccination.

Methods: A cross-sectional survey of 194 adult HCT survivors was analyzed using convergent mixed methods. The analysis used various statistical methods to determine the prevalence of barriers and facilitators and the association between revaccination and the number and specific type of barriers and facilitators. Content analysis was applied to open-ended item responses. Integrated analysis merged quantitative and qualitative findings.

Results: The most frequent barriers included the inability to receive live vaccines because of immunosuppression, identifying a suitable community location for administering childhood vaccines to adults, and delayed immune recovery. The most frequent facilitators were having healthcare insurance and a clear calendar of the revaccination schedule. Complete revaccination rates were lower with each additional reported barrier (OR = 0.58; 95% CI 0.459-0.722) and higher with each additional reported facilitator (OR = 1.31; 95% CI 1.05-1.63). Content analysis suggested that most barriers were practical issues. One significant facilitator highlighted by respondents was for the transplant center to coordinate and serve as the vaccination location for revaccination services. Merged analysis indicated convergence between quantitative and qualitative data.

Conclusion: Practical barriers and facilitators played a consequential role in revaccination uptake, and survivors would like to be revaccinated at the transplant center.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Transplant Infectious Disease
Transplant Infectious Disease 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
210
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Transplant Infectious Disease has been established as a forum for presenting the most current information on the prevention and treatment of infection complicating organ and bone marrow transplantation. The point of view of the journal is that infection and allograft rejection (or graft-versus-host disease) are closely intertwined, and that advances in one area will have immediate consequences on the other. The interaction of the transplant recipient with potential microbial invaders, the impact of immunosuppressive strategies on this interaction, and the effects of cytokines, growth factors, and chemokines liberated during the course of infections, rejection, or graft-versus-host disease are central to the interests and mission of this journal. Transplant Infectious Disease is aimed at disseminating the latest information relevant to the infectious disease complications of transplantation to clinicians and scientists involved in bone marrow, kidney, liver, heart, lung, intestinal, and pancreatic transplantation. The infectious disease consequences and concerns regarding innovative transplant strategies, from novel immunosuppressive agents to xenotransplantation, are very much a concern of this journal. In addition, this journal feels a particular responsibility to inform primary care practitioners in the community, who increasingly are sharing the responsibility for the care of these patients, of the special considerations regarding the prevention and treatment of infection in transplant recipients. As exemplified by the international editorial board, articles are sought throughout the world that address both general issues and those of a more restricted geographic import.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信