原因不明的复发性妊娠失败妇女中抗凝血酶原 IgM 和 IgG 自身抗体的高流行率。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Reproductive Sciences Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-07 DOI:10.1007/s43032-024-01725-2
Ramzi R Finan, Nisrine Beydoun, Eddie Racoubian, Wael Bahia, Selima Ferchichi, Wassim Y Almawi
{"title":"原因不明的复发性妊娠失败妇女中抗凝血酶原 IgM 和 IgG 自身抗体的高流行率。","authors":"Ramzi R Finan, Nisrine Beydoun, Eddie Racoubian, Wael Bahia, Selima Ferchichi, Wassim Y Almawi","doi":"10.1007/s43032-024-01725-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To investigate the association between anti-prothrombin IgM and IgG antibodies and recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) in a cohort of Lebanese women, and their impact on pregnancy outcomes. This was a retrospective case-control study involving 207 women with RPL and 179 age-matched multiparous controls. Quantitative sandwich ELISA assayed anti-prothrombin IgM and IgG antibodies. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were employed to assess the risk imparted by anti-prothrombin antibodies, while ROC analysis was used to determine their sensitivity and specificity. Our study revealed that women with RPL had significantly higher serum levels of anti-prothrombin IgM and IgG than controls. Univariate regression analysis demonstrated that elevated anti-prothrombin IgM (OR = 1.13; 95% CI = 1.07, 1.19; P < 0.001) and IgG (OR = 1.05; 95% CI = 1.03, 1.08; P < 0.001) were associated with increased RPL risk. Multivariate analysis confirmed these findings, indicating that anti-prothrombin IgM (aOR = 1.13; 95% CI = 1.05, 1.20; P < 0.001) and IgG (aOR = 1.08; 95% CI = 1.05, 1.11; P < 0.001) are independent risk factors. ROC analysis yielded an AUC of 0.720 for IgM and 0.649 for IgG, underscoring their predictive value and offering hope for improved risk assessment and management of RPL. Elevated levels of anti-prothrombin IgM and IgG are significantly associated with RPL, suggesting an autoimmune component to pregnancy loss. These findings highlight the importance of screening for these antibodies in women with unexplained RPL to guide management and therapeutic strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":20920,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive Sciences","volume":" ","pages":"3851-3857"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"High Prevalence of Anti-Prothrombin IgM and IgG Autoantibodies in Women With Unexplained Recurrent Pregnancy Loss.\",\"authors\":\"Ramzi R Finan, Nisrine Beydoun, Eddie Racoubian, Wael Bahia, Selima Ferchichi, Wassim Y Almawi\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s43032-024-01725-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>To investigate the association between anti-prothrombin IgM and IgG antibodies and recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) in a cohort of Lebanese women, and their impact on pregnancy outcomes. This was a retrospective case-control study involving 207 women with RPL and 179 age-matched multiparous controls. Quantitative sandwich ELISA assayed anti-prothrombin IgM and IgG antibodies. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were employed to assess the risk imparted by anti-prothrombin antibodies, while ROC analysis was used to determine their sensitivity and specificity. Our study revealed that women with RPL had significantly higher serum levels of anti-prothrombin IgM and IgG than controls. Univariate regression analysis demonstrated that elevated anti-prothrombin IgM (OR = 1.13; 95% CI = 1.07, 1.19; P < 0.001) and IgG (OR = 1.05; 95% CI = 1.03, 1.08; P < 0.001) were associated with increased RPL risk. Multivariate analysis confirmed these findings, indicating that anti-prothrombin IgM (aOR = 1.13; 95% CI = 1.05, 1.20; P < 0.001) and IgG (aOR = 1.08; 95% CI = 1.05, 1.11; P < 0.001) are independent risk factors. ROC analysis yielded an AUC of 0.720 for IgM and 0.649 for IgG, underscoring their predictive value and offering hope for improved risk assessment and management of RPL. Elevated levels of anti-prothrombin IgM and IgG are significantly associated with RPL, suggesting an autoimmune component to pregnancy loss. These findings highlight the importance of screening for these antibodies in women with unexplained RPL to guide management and therapeutic strategies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20920,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reproductive Sciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"3851-3857\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reproductive Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43032-024-01725-2\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reproductive Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43032-024-01725-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究黎巴嫩妇女队列中抗凝血酶原 IgM 和 IgG 抗体与复发性妊娠失败(RPL)之间的关系及其对妊娠结局的影响。这是一项回顾性病例对照研究,涉及207名RPL妇女和179名年龄匹配的多胎对照组。定量夹心酶联免疫吸附法测定抗凝血酶 IgM 和 IgG 抗体。采用单变量和多变量逻辑回归评估抗凝血酶抗体带来的风险,同时采用 ROC 分析确定其敏感性和特异性。我们的研究显示,患有 RPL 的妇女血清中的抗凝血酶 IgM 和 IgG 水平明显高于对照组。单变量回归分析表明,抗凝血酶 IgM 升高(OR = 1.13; 95% CI = 1.07, 1.19; P
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
High Prevalence of Anti-Prothrombin IgM and IgG Autoantibodies in Women With Unexplained Recurrent Pregnancy Loss.

To investigate the association between anti-prothrombin IgM and IgG antibodies and recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) in a cohort of Lebanese women, and their impact on pregnancy outcomes. This was a retrospective case-control study involving 207 women with RPL and 179 age-matched multiparous controls. Quantitative sandwich ELISA assayed anti-prothrombin IgM and IgG antibodies. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were employed to assess the risk imparted by anti-prothrombin antibodies, while ROC analysis was used to determine their sensitivity and specificity. Our study revealed that women with RPL had significantly higher serum levels of anti-prothrombin IgM and IgG than controls. Univariate regression analysis demonstrated that elevated anti-prothrombin IgM (OR = 1.13; 95% CI = 1.07, 1.19; P < 0.001) and IgG (OR = 1.05; 95% CI = 1.03, 1.08; P < 0.001) were associated with increased RPL risk. Multivariate analysis confirmed these findings, indicating that anti-prothrombin IgM (aOR = 1.13; 95% CI = 1.05, 1.20; P < 0.001) and IgG (aOR = 1.08; 95% CI = 1.05, 1.11; P < 0.001) are independent risk factors. ROC analysis yielded an AUC of 0.720 for IgM and 0.649 for IgG, underscoring their predictive value and offering hope for improved risk assessment and management of RPL. Elevated levels of anti-prothrombin IgM and IgG are significantly associated with RPL, suggesting an autoimmune component to pregnancy loss. These findings highlight the importance of screening for these antibodies in women with unexplained RPL to guide management and therapeutic strategies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Reproductive Sciences
Reproductive Sciences 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
3.40%
发文量
322
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Reproductive Sciences (RS) is a peer-reviewed, monthly journal publishing original research and reviews in obstetrics and gynecology. RS is multi-disciplinary and includes research in basic reproductive biology and medicine, maternal-fetal medicine, obstetrics, gynecology, reproductive endocrinology, urogynecology, fertility/infertility, embryology, gynecologic/reproductive oncology, developmental biology, stem cell research, molecular/cellular biology and other related fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信