{"title":"骨关节炎 2024 年回顾:生物力学。","authors":"Annegret Mündermann , Corina Nüesch , Hannah Ewald , Ilse Jonkers","doi":"10.1016/j.joca.2024.09.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>We aimed to systematically review and summarize the literature of the past year on osteoarthritis (OA) and biomechanics, to highlight gaps and challenges, and to present some promising approaches and developments.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A systematic literature search was conducted using Pubmed and the Web of Science Core Collection. We included original articles and systematic reviews on OA and biomechanics in human subjects published between April 2023 and April 2024.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 155 studies that met the inclusion criteria, 9 were systematic reviews and 146 were original (mostly cross-sectional) studies that included a total of 6488 patients and 1921 controls with a mean age of 57.5 and 44.7 years, respectively. Promising advances have been made in medical imaging of affected soft tissue structures, the relationship between soft tissue properties and biomechanical changes in OA, new technologies to facilitate easier assessment of ambulatory biomechanics, and personalized physics-based models that also include complex chemical and mechanobiological mechanisms, all of which are relevant to gaining mechanistic insights into the pathophysiology of OA.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>There is still an unmet need for larger longitudinal data sets that combine clinical, radiological, and biomechanical outcomes to characterize the biomechanical fingerprint that underlies the trajectory of functional decline and biomechanical phenotypes of OA. In addition, criteria and guidelines for control groups, as well as methods and standards for model verification allowing for comparisons between studies are needed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19654,"journal":{"name":"Osteoarthritis and Cartilage","volume":"32 12","pages":"Pages 1530-1541"},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Osteoarthritis year in review 2024: Biomechanics\",\"authors\":\"Annegret Mündermann , Corina Nüesch , Hannah Ewald , Ilse Jonkers\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.joca.2024.09.011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>We aimed to systematically review and summarize the literature of the past year on osteoarthritis (OA) and biomechanics, to highlight gaps and challenges, and to present some promising approaches and developments.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A systematic literature search was conducted using Pubmed and the Web of Science Core Collection. We included original articles and systematic reviews on OA and biomechanics in human subjects published between April 2023 and April 2024.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 155 studies that met the inclusion criteria, 9 were systematic reviews and 146 were original (mostly cross-sectional) studies that included a total of 6488 patients and 1921 controls with a mean age of 57.5 and 44.7 years, respectively. Promising advances have been made in medical imaging of affected soft tissue structures, the relationship between soft tissue properties and biomechanical changes in OA, new technologies to facilitate easier assessment of ambulatory biomechanics, and personalized physics-based models that also include complex chemical and mechanobiological mechanisms, all of which are relevant to gaining mechanistic insights into the pathophysiology of OA.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>There is still an unmet need for larger longitudinal data sets that combine clinical, radiological, and biomechanical outcomes to characterize the biomechanical fingerprint that underlies the trajectory of functional decline and biomechanical phenotypes of OA. In addition, criteria and guidelines for control groups, as well as methods and standards for model verification allowing for comparisons between studies are needed.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19654,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Osteoarthritis and Cartilage\",\"volume\":\"32 12\",\"pages\":\"Pages 1530-1541\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Osteoarthritis and Cartilage\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1063458424014055\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Osteoarthritis and Cartilage","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1063458424014055","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的我们旨在系统回顾和总结过去一年有关 OA 和生物力学的文献,突出差距和挑战,并介绍一些有前景的方法和发展:使用 Pubmed 和 Web of Science Core Collection 进行了系统的文献检索。我们纳入了 2023 年 4 月至 2024 年 4 月间发表的关于人体 OA 和生物力学的原创文章和系统综述:结果:在符合纳入标准的 155 项研究中,9 项为系统综述,146 项为原创(大部分为横断面)研究,共纳入 6488 名患者和 1921 名对照者,平均年龄分别为 57.5 岁和 44.7 岁。受影响软组织结构的医学成像、OA 中软组织特性与生物力学变化之间的关系、便于评估非卧床生物力学的新技术以及基于物理学的个性化模型(其中还包括复杂的化学和机械生物学机制)等方面都取得了可喜的进展,所有这些都有助于从机理上深入了解 OA 的病理生理学:目前仍然需要结合临床、放射学和生物力学结果的更大规模的纵向数据集,以描述支撑 OA 功能衰退轨迹和生物力学表型的生物力学指纹。此外,还需要制定对照组的标准和指南,以及模型验证的方法和标准,以便在不同研究之间进行比较。
We aimed to systematically review and summarize the literature of the past year on osteoarthritis (OA) and biomechanics, to highlight gaps and challenges, and to present some promising approaches and developments.
Methods
A systematic literature search was conducted using Pubmed and the Web of Science Core Collection. We included original articles and systematic reviews on OA and biomechanics in human subjects published between April 2023 and April 2024.
Results
Of the 155 studies that met the inclusion criteria, 9 were systematic reviews and 146 were original (mostly cross-sectional) studies that included a total of 6488 patients and 1921 controls with a mean age of 57.5 and 44.7 years, respectively. Promising advances have been made in medical imaging of affected soft tissue structures, the relationship between soft tissue properties and biomechanical changes in OA, new technologies to facilitate easier assessment of ambulatory biomechanics, and personalized physics-based models that also include complex chemical and mechanobiological mechanisms, all of which are relevant to gaining mechanistic insights into the pathophysiology of OA.
Conclusions
There is still an unmet need for larger longitudinal data sets that combine clinical, radiological, and biomechanical outcomes to characterize the biomechanical fingerprint that underlies the trajectory of functional decline and biomechanical phenotypes of OA. In addition, criteria and guidelines for control groups, as well as methods and standards for model verification allowing for comparisons between studies are needed.
期刊介绍:
Osteoarthritis and Cartilage is the official journal of the Osteoarthritis Research Society International.
It is an international, multidisciplinary journal that disseminates information for the many kinds of specialists and practitioners concerned with osteoarthritis.