对阿曼镰状细胞病患者进行红细胞扩展抗原分型,以加强日常输血实践。

Q4 Medicine
Immunohematology Pub Date : 2024-10-04 Print Date: 2024-09-01 DOI:10.2478/immunohematology-2024-0014
Amal Salim Al Breiki, Salam Al Kindi, Lilian Castilho
{"title":"对阿曼镰状细胞病患者进行红细胞扩展抗原分型,以加强日常输血实践。","authors":"Amal Salim Al Breiki, Salam Al Kindi, Lilian Castilho","doi":"10.2478/immunohematology-2024-0014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Many Omani patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) undergo red blood cell (RBC) transfusions that are only matched for ABO and D, making RBC alloimmunization a significant concern in this population. Currently, the integration of molecular assays and hemagglutination testing helps to determine RBC phenotypes and genotypes, facilitating the provision of compatible blood and minimizing additional alloimmunization risks in patients with SCD. Based on this finding, our objective was to use molecular methods to predict the extended antigen profile of Omani patients with SCD across various blood group systems including Rh, Kell, Duffy, Kidd, Colton, Lutheran, Dombrock, Diego, Cartwright, and Scianna. This approach aims to implement RBC matching strategies and enhance daily transfusion practices for these patients. Molecular methods encompassed multiplex polymerase chain reaction for <i>RHD,</i> BeadChip arrays for variants of <i>RHD</i> and <i>RHCE,</i> and ID CORE XT for the primary allelic variants of RBCs. This study enrolled 38 patients with SCD, comprising 34 patients with homozygous HbSS, 1 patient with HbSC, and 3 patients with HbS Oman. The predominant ABO blood group was group O, observed in 44.7 percent of patients, followed by group A in 21.1 percent and group B in 13.2 percent. The most prevalent Rh phenotype predicted from the genotype was D+C+E-c+e+, identified in 34.2 percent of patients. All patient samples were K-, exhibiting the k+ Kp(b+) Js(b+) phenotype, with 81.6 percent demonstrating Fy(a-b-) due to the homozygous <i>FY*02N.01</i> genotype and 28.9 percent displaying Jk(a+b-). <i>RH</i> variant alleles were detected in five patients (13.2 %), with only one type of <i>RHD</i> variant (<i>RHD*DIIIa</i>) and one type of <i>RHCE</i> variant (<i>RHCE*ceVS.02.01</i>) identified. Alloantibodies were present in 26 patients (68.4%). This study presents the initial comprehensive report of extended RBC antigen profiling in Omani patients with SCD, revealing disparities in the prevalence of RBC phenotypes compared with SCD patients from other regions and countries. Furthermore, our findings underscore a high rate of alloimmunization in these patients, emphasizing the need to implement antigen-matching programs to improve daily transfusion practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":13357,"journal":{"name":"Immunohematology","volume":"40 3","pages":"93-99"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Red blood cell extended antigen typing in Omani patients with sickle cell disease to enhance daily transfusion practice.\",\"authors\":\"Amal Salim Al Breiki, Salam Al Kindi, Lilian Castilho\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/immunohematology-2024-0014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Many Omani patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) undergo red blood cell (RBC) transfusions that are only matched for ABO and D, making RBC alloimmunization a significant concern in this population. Currently, the integration of molecular assays and hemagglutination testing helps to determine RBC phenotypes and genotypes, facilitating the provision of compatible blood and minimizing additional alloimmunization risks in patients with SCD. Based on this finding, our objective was to use molecular methods to predict the extended antigen profile of Omani patients with SCD across various blood group systems including Rh, Kell, Duffy, Kidd, Colton, Lutheran, Dombrock, Diego, Cartwright, and Scianna. This approach aims to implement RBC matching strategies and enhance daily transfusion practices for these patients. Molecular methods encompassed multiplex polymerase chain reaction for <i>RHD,</i> BeadChip arrays for variants of <i>RHD</i> and <i>RHCE,</i> and ID CORE XT for the primary allelic variants of RBCs. This study enrolled 38 patients with SCD, comprising 34 patients with homozygous HbSS, 1 patient with HbSC, and 3 patients with HbS Oman. The predominant ABO blood group was group O, observed in 44.7 percent of patients, followed by group A in 21.1 percent and group B in 13.2 percent. The most prevalent Rh phenotype predicted from the genotype was D+C+E-c+e+, identified in 34.2 percent of patients. All patient samples were K-, exhibiting the k+ Kp(b+) Js(b+) phenotype, with 81.6 percent demonstrating Fy(a-b-) due to the homozygous <i>FY*02N.01</i> genotype and 28.9 percent displaying Jk(a+b-). <i>RH</i> variant alleles were detected in five patients (13.2 %), with only one type of <i>RHD</i> variant (<i>RHD*DIIIa</i>) and one type of <i>RHCE</i> variant (<i>RHCE*ceVS.02.01</i>) identified. Alloantibodies were present in 26 patients (68.4%). This study presents the initial comprehensive report of extended RBC antigen profiling in Omani patients with SCD, revealing disparities in the prevalence of RBC phenotypes compared with SCD patients from other regions and countries. Furthermore, our findings underscore a high rate of alloimmunization in these patients, emphasizing the need to implement antigen-matching programs to improve daily transfusion practices.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13357,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Immunohematology\",\"volume\":\"40 3\",\"pages\":\"93-99\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Immunohematology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/immunohematology-2024-0014\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Print\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Immunohematology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/immunohematology-2024-0014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

许多阿曼镰状细胞病(SCD)患者接受的红细胞(RBC)输血仅有 ABO 和 D 两种血型相匹配,这使得红细胞异体免疫成为该人群的一个重大问题。目前,分子检测和血凝试验的结合有助于确定 RBC 表型和基因型,从而为 SCD 患者提供相合的血液并将额外的同种异体免疫风险降至最低。基于这一发现,我们的目标是使用分子方法预测阿曼 SCD 患者不同血型系统的扩展抗原谱,包括 Rh、Kell、Duffy、Kidd、Colton、Lutheran、Dombrock、Diego、Cartwright 和 Scianna。这种方法旨在实施红细胞匹配策略,加强这些患者的日常输血实践。分子方法包括针对 RHD 的多重聚合酶链反应、针对 RHD 和 RHCE 变异的 BeadChip 阵列以及针对 RBC 主要等位基因变异的 ID CORE XT。该研究共纳入 38 名 SCD 患者,其中包括 34 名同型 HbSS 患者、1 名 HbSC 患者和 3 名 HbS Oman 患者。44.7%的患者主要ABO血型为O型,其次是21.1%的A型和13.2%的B型。根据基因型预测出的最普遍的 Rh 表型是 D+C+E-c+e+,在 34.2% 的患者中发现了这一表型。所有患者样本均为 K-,表现为 k+ Kp(b+) Js(b+) 表型,其中 81.6% 的样本因同源 FY*02N.01 基因型而表现为 Fy(a-b-),28.9% 的样本表现为 Jk(a+b-)。5名患者(13.2%)检测到了RH变异等位基因,其中只发现了一种RHD变异类型(RHD*DIIIa)和一种RHCE变异类型(RHCE*ceVS.02.01)。26名患者(68.4%)出现了异体抗体。这项研究首次全面报告了阿曼 SCD 患者的扩展 RBC 抗原图谱,揭示了与其他地区和国家的 SCD 患者相比,RBC 表型流行率的差异。此外,我们的研究结果还强调了这些患者的高异体免疫率,强调了实施抗原匹配计划以改善日常输血实践的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Red blood cell extended antigen typing in Omani patients with sickle cell disease to enhance daily transfusion practice.

Many Omani patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) undergo red blood cell (RBC) transfusions that are only matched for ABO and D, making RBC alloimmunization a significant concern in this population. Currently, the integration of molecular assays and hemagglutination testing helps to determine RBC phenotypes and genotypes, facilitating the provision of compatible blood and minimizing additional alloimmunization risks in patients with SCD. Based on this finding, our objective was to use molecular methods to predict the extended antigen profile of Omani patients with SCD across various blood group systems including Rh, Kell, Duffy, Kidd, Colton, Lutheran, Dombrock, Diego, Cartwright, and Scianna. This approach aims to implement RBC matching strategies and enhance daily transfusion practices for these patients. Molecular methods encompassed multiplex polymerase chain reaction for RHD, BeadChip arrays for variants of RHD and RHCE, and ID CORE XT for the primary allelic variants of RBCs. This study enrolled 38 patients with SCD, comprising 34 patients with homozygous HbSS, 1 patient with HbSC, and 3 patients with HbS Oman. The predominant ABO blood group was group O, observed in 44.7 percent of patients, followed by group A in 21.1 percent and group B in 13.2 percent. The most prevalent Rh phenotype predicted from the genotype was D+C+E-c+e+, identified in 34.2 percent of patients. All patient samples were K-, exhibiting the k+ Kp(b+) Js(b+) phenotype, with 81.6 percent demonstrating Fy(a-b-) due to the homozygous FY*02N.01 genotype and 28.9 percent displaying Jk(a+b-). RH variant alleles were detected in five patients (13.2 %), with only one type of RHD variant (RHD*DIIIa) and one type of RHCE variant (RHCE*ceVS.02.01) identified. Alloantibodies were present in 26 patients (68.4%). This study presents the initial comprehensive report of extended RBC antigen profiling in Omani patients with SCD, revealing disparities in the prevalence of RBC phenotypes compared with SCD patients from other regions and countries. Furthermore, our findings underscore a high rate of alloimmunization in these patients, emphasizing the need to implement antigen-matching programs to improve daily transfusion practices.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Immunohematology
Immunohematology Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信