关于完善和扩展个体化卵巢刺激疗法关键绩效指标的专家意见。

IF 6.6 1区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Sesh K Sunkara, Juan-Enrique Schwarze, Raoul Orvieto, Robert Fischer, Michael H Dahan, Sandro C Esteves, Monica Lispi, Thomas D'Hooghe, Carlo Alviggi
{"title":"关于完善和扩展个体化卵巢刺激疗法关键绩效指标的专家意见。","authors":"Sesh K Sunkara, Juan-Enrique Schwarze, Raoul Orvieto, Robert Fischer, Michael H Dahan, Sandro C Esteves, Monica Lispi, Thomas D'Hooghe, Carlo Alviggi","doi":"10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.10.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the adequate ovarian follicular development and oocyte recovery between ovarian potential (antral follicle count [AFC]) before the start of ovarian stimulation (OS) and oocyte quantity and quality at oocyte retrieval. A holistic overview of the current key performance indicators (KPIs) was applied to identify the complementary strengths and identify where the current repertoire can be expanded.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Expert opinion.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>Not applicable.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>To formulate a proposal for a refined and expanded repertoire of KPIs for individualized OS for Assisted Reproductive Technology.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The performance and outcomes of OS on ovarian follicular development can be evaluated through the application of defined KPIs. Current KPIs for OS are the ovarian sensitivity index (OSI), the follicular output rate (FORT), the oocyte retrieval rate (ORR), and the follicle to oocyte index (FOI). Notably, there are no specific KPIs dedicated to the assessment of follicular development (i.e., recruitment, selection, growth and dominance). In light of this, we recommend expanding the current KPIs for OS to include \"Early FORT\" (accounting for the number of follicles measuring ≥10-11 mm on Day 5/6 of OS relative to AFC) and \"Modified FORT\" (the ratio between the number of follicles measuring ≥12 mm at the time of oocyte maturation triggering and AFC); the extension of ORR to include two discrete categories at oocyte retrieval: follicles ≥12 mm and follicles ≥16 mm, to ensure all responsive follicles are accounted for; and FOI to be measured at oocyte maturation triggering and oocyte retrieval (\"Advanced FOI\").</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Once validated and adopted in clinical practice, we envisage that the proposed expanded KPIs measuring the effect of OS on follicular development (recruitment, selection, growth and dominance) will increase the understanding of the relationship between ovarian reserve measured by AFC and oocyte quantity and quality at oocyte retrieval. This understanding will enable physicians to better evaluate the direct effect of different gonadotropins and doses on ovarian response, leading to a more personalized approach to OS in the context of ART treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":12275,"journal":{"name":"Fertility and sterility","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Expert Opinion on Refined and Extended Key Performance Indicators for Individualized Ovarian Stimulation for ART.\",\"authors\":\"Sesh K Sunkara, Juan-Enrique Schwarze, Raoul Orvieto, Robert Fischer, Michael H Dahan, Sandro C Esteves, Monica Lispi, Thomas D'Hooghe, Carlo Alviggi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.10.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the adequate ovarian follicular development and oocyte recovery between ovarian potential (antral follicle count [AFC]) before the start of ovarian stimulation (OS) and oocyte quantity and quality at oocyte retrieval. A holistic overview of the current key performance indicators (KPIs) was applied to identify the complementary strengths and identify where the current repertoire can be expanded.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Expert opinion.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>Not applicable.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>To formulate a proposal for a refined and expanded repertoire of KPIs for individualized OS for Assisted Reproductive Technology.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The performance and outcomes of OS on ovarian follicular development can be evaluated through the application of defined KPIs. Current KPIs for OS are the ovarian sensitivity index (OSI), the follicular output rate (FORT), the oocyte retrieval rate (ORR), and the follicle to oocyte index (FOI). Notably, there are no specific KPIs dedicated to the assessment of follicular development (i.e., recruitment, selection, growth and dominance). In light of this, we recommend expanding the current KPIs for OS to include \\\"Early FORT\\\" (accounting for the number of follicles measuring ≥10-11 mm on Day 5/6 of OS relative to AFC) and \\\"Modified FORT\\\" (the ratio between the number of follicles measuring ≥12 mm at the time of oocyte maturation triggering and AFC); the extension of ORR to include two discrete categories at oocyte retrieval: follicles ≥12 mm and follicles ≥16 mm, to ensure all responsive follicles are accounted for; and FOI to be measured at oocyte maturation triggering and oocyte retrieval (\\\"Advanced FOI\\\").</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Once validated and adopted in clinical practice, we envisage that the proposed expanded KPIs measuring the effect of OS on follicular development (recruitment, selection, growth and dominance) will increase the understanding of the relationship between ovarian reserve measured by AFC and oocyte quantity and quality at oocyte retrieval. This understanding will enable physicians to better evaluate the direct effect of different gonadotropins and doses on ovarian response, leading to a more personalized approach to OS in the context of ART treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12275,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fertility and sterility\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fertility and sterility\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.10.001\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fertility and sterility","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.10.001","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的评估卵巢刺激(OS)开始前卵巢潜能(前卵泡计数[AFC])与卵母细胞获取时的卵母细胞数量和质量之间的充分卵泡发育和卵母细胞恢复情况。对目前的关键绩效指标(KPIs)进行了全面概述,以确定优势互补之处,并确定可在哪些方面扩大目前的范围:设计:专家意见:干预措施:无:干预措施:无:主要结果测量:为辅助生殖技术个体化操作系统的KPI指标库的完善和扩展提出建议:结果:OS对卵巢卵泡发育的性能和结果可通过应用定义的关键绩效指标进行评估。OS 目前的关键绩效指标包括卵巢敏感性指数 (OSI)、卵泡产出率 (FORT)、卵母细胞获取率 (ORR) 和卵泡至卵母细胞指数 (FOI)。值得注意的是,没有专门用于评估卵泡发育(即招募、选择、生长和优势)的特定 KPI。有鉴于此,我们建议扩大 OS 目前的 KPI 指标,以包括 "早期 FORT"(OS 第 5/6 天测量值≥10-11 mm 的卵泡数量与 AFC 的比值)和 "修正 FORT"(卵母细胞成熟触发时测量值≥12 mm 的卵泡数量与 AFC 的比值);扩大 ORR,以包括卵母细胞取回时的两个不同类别:≥12毫米的卵泡和≥16毫米的卵泡,以确保所有有反应的卵泡都被计算在内;在卵母细胞成熟触发和卵母细胞取出时测量FOI("高级FOI")。得出结论:我们设想,一旦经过验证并在临床实践中采用,所提出的衡量操作系统对卵泡发育(募集、选择、生长和优势)影响的扩展关键绩效指标将加深对 AFC 所衡量的卵巢储备与卵母细胞取回时的卵母细胞数量和质量之间关系的理解。有了这种认识,医生就能更好地评估不同促性腺激素和剂量对卵巢反应的直接影响,从而在抗逆转录病毒疗法中采用更个性化的 OS 方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Expert Opinion on Refined and Extended Key Performance Indicators for Individualized Ovarian Stimulation for ART.

Objective: To assess the adequate ovarian follicular development and oocyte recovery between ovarian potential (antral follicle count [AFC]) before the start of ovarian stimulation (OS) and oocyte quantity and quality at oocyte retrieval. A holistic overview of the current key performance indicators (KPIs) was applied to identify the complementary strengths and identify where the current repertoire can be expanded.

Design: Expert opinion.

Subjects: Not applicable.

Intervention: None.

Main outcome measures: To formulate a proposal for a refined and expanded repertoire of KPIs for individualized OS for Assisted Reproductive Technology.

Results: The performance and outcomes of OS on ovarian follicular development can be evaluated through the application of defined KPIs. Current KPIs for OS are the ovarian sensitivity index (OSI), the follicular output rate (FORT), the oocyte retrieval rate (ORR), and the follicle to oocyte index (FOI). Notably, there are no specific KPIs dedicated to the assessment of follicular development (i.e., recruitment, selection, growth and dominance). In light of this, we recommend expanding the current KPIs for OS to include "Early FORT" (accounting for the number of follicles measuring ≥10-11 mm on Day 5/6 of OS relative to AFC) and "Modified FORT" (the ratio between the number of follicles measuring ≥12 mm at the time of oocyte maturation triggering and AFC); the extension of ORR to include two discrete categories at oocyte retrieval: follicles ≥12 mm and follicles ≥16 mm, to ensure all responsive follicles are accounted for; and FOI to be measured at oocyte maturation triggering and oocyte retrieval ("Advanced FOI").

Conclusions: Once validated and adopted in clinical practice, we envisage that the proposed expanded KPIs measuring the effect of OS on follicular development (recruitment, selection, growth and dominance) will increase the understanding of the relationship between ovarian reserve measured by AFC and oocyte quantity and quality at oocyte retrieval. This understanding will enable physicians to better evaluate the direct effect of different gonadotropins and doses on ovarian response, leading to a more personalized approach to OS in the context of ART treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Fertility and sterility
Fertility and sterility 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
6.00%
发文量
1446
审稿时长
31 days
期刊介绍: Fertility and Sterility® is an international journal for obstetricians, gynecologists, reproductive endocrinologists, urologists, basic scientists and others who treat and investigate problems of infertility and human reproductive disorders. The journal publishes juried original scientific articles in clinical and laboratory research relevant to reproductive endocrinology, urology, andrology, physiology, immunology, genetics, contraception, and menopause. Fertility and Sterility® encourages and supports meaningful basic and clinical research, and facilitates and promotes excellence in professional education, in the field of reproductive medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信