针对朝天鼻窦疾病的巴斯康裂隙提升手术后的闭合切口负压伤口疗法:一项比较伤口愈合情况的随机研究。

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Ida Kaad Faurschou, Marlene Julia Sørensen, Allan Gorm Pedersen, Simon Ladefoged Rasmussen, Rune Erichsen, Susanne Haas
{"title":"针对朝天鼻窦疾病的巴斯康裂隙提升手术后的闭合切口负压伤口疗法:一项比较伤口愈合情况的随机研究。","authors":"Ida Kaad Faurschou, Marlene Julia Sørensen, Allan Gorm Pedersen, Simon Ladefoged Rasmussen, Rune Erichsen, Susanne Haas","doi":"10.1111/codi.17198","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Despite favourable outcomes in recurrence after off-midline closure techniques in pilonidal surgery, between 18% and 40% of patients suffer from prolonged postoperative wound healing. The aim of this work was to investigate if closed-incision negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT) promotes wound healing after Bascom's cleft lift (BCL) surgery for complicated pilonidal sinus disease compared with conventional drainage and dressing.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Patients were randomized to either NPWT for 4-7 days or loop-vessel drain for 24 h and a dry dressing postoperatively. Healing was evaluated by a wound care nurse blinded for randomization at 2 and 12 weeks postoperatively (primary endpoint). Healing was defined as one or no closing defects of ≤5 mm and with no undermining.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Although we had wanted to recruit 200 patients, the study was terminated at 118 patients (NPWT group, n = 60; control group, n = 58) after interim analysis. Patients were comparable by age, sex, body mass index, previous smoking status and indication for BCL surgery. At 2 weeks 12% of patients were healed in both the NPWT and control groups [risk difference = 0.00(95% CI -0.12 to 0.11), p = 1.00]. After 12 weeks, 68% of patients were healed in the NPWT group and 72% in the control group [risk difference = -0.03 (95% CI 0.19 to 0.13), p = 0.82]. There was no significant difference in pain experienced postsurgery. In a symptom-based questionnaire, the control group reported self-esteem to be less affected (p = 0.015).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Closed-incision negative-pressure wound therapy did not significantly improve healing after BCL surgery for complicated pilonidal sinus disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":10512,"journal":{"name":"Colorectal Disease","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Closed-incision negative-pressure wound therapy after Bascom's cleft lift surgery for pilonidal sinus disease: A randomized study comparing healing.\",\"authors\":\"Ida Kaad Faurschou, Marlene Julia Sørensen, Allan Gorm Pedersen, Simon Ladefoged Rasmussen, Rune Erichsen, Susanne Haas\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/codi.17198\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Despite favourable outcomes in recurrence after off-midline closure techniques in pilonidal surgery, between 18% and 40% of patients suffer from prolonged postoperative wound healing. The aim of this work was to investigate if closed-incision negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT) promotes wound healing after Bascom's cleft lift (BCL) surgery for complicated pilonidal sinus disease compared with conventional drainage and dressing.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Patients were randomized to either NPWT for 4-7 days or loop-vessel drain for 24 h and a dry dressing postoperatively. Healing was evaluated by a wound care nurse blinded for randomization at 2 and 12 weeks postoperatively (primary endpoint). Healing was defined as one or no closing defects of ≤5 mm and with no undermining.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Although we had wanted to recruit 200 patients, the study was terminated at 118 patients (NPWT group, n = 60; control group, n = 58) after interim analysis. Patients were comparable by age, sex, body mass index, previous smoking status and indication for BCL surgery. At 2 weeks 12% of patients were healed in both the NPWT and control groups [risk difference = 0.00(95% CI -0.12 to 0.11), p = 1.00]. After 12 weeks, 68% of patients were healed in the NPWT group and 72% in the control group [risk difference = -0.03 (95% CI 0.19 to 0.13), p = 0.82]. There was no significant difference in pain experienced postsurgery. In a symptom-based questionnaire, the control group reported self-esteem to be less affected (p = 0.015).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Closed-incision negative-pressure wound therapy did not significantly improve healing after BCL surgery for complicated pilonidal sinus disease.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10512,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Colorectal Disease\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Colorectal Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.17198\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Colorectal Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.17198","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:尽管朝天鼻手术中线外闭合技术的复发率较高,但仍有18%至40%的患者术后伤口愈合时间较长。本研究旨在探讨与传统引流和敷料相比,闭合切口负压伤口疗法(NPWT)是否能促进复杂性朝天鼻窦疾病巴氏裂孔提升术(BCL)术后的伤口愈合:方法:患者在术后随机接受4-7天的NPWT治疗或24小时的环形血管引流和干性敷料治疗。术后 2 周和 12 周,由一名对随机分组保密的伤口护理护士对愈合情况进行评估(主要终点)。痊愈的定义是一个或没有≤5毫米的闭合缺损,且没有破坏:尽管我们希望招募 200 名患者,但经过中期分析后,研究在 118 名患者(NPWT 组,n = 60;对照组,n = 58)时终止。患者的年龄、性别、体重指数、既往吸烟情况和 BCL 手术指征具有可比性。2 周后,NPWT 组和对照组均有 12% 的患者痊愈[风险差异 = 0.00(95% CI -0.12 至 0.11),P = 1.00]。12 周后,NPWT 组有 68% 的患者痊愈,对照组有 72% 的患者痊愈[风险差异 = -0.03 (95% CI 0.19 至 0.13),P = 0.82]。术后疼痛无明显差异。在基于症状的问卷调查中,对照组自尊心受到的影响较小(p = 0.015):结论:闭合切口负压伤口疗法并不能明显改善复杂朝天鼻窦疾病 BCL 手术后的愈合情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Closed-incision negative-pressure wound therapy after Bascom's cleft lift surgery for pilonidal sinus disease: A randomized study comparing healing.

Aim: Despite favourable outcomes in recurrence after off-midline closure techniques in pilonidal surgery, between 18% and 40% of patients suffer from prolonged postoperative wound healing. The aim of this work was to investigate if closed-incision negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT) promotes wound healing after Bascom's cleft lift (BCL) surgery for complicated pilonidal sinus disease compared with conventional drainage and dressing.

Method: Patients were randomized to either NPWT for 4-7 days or loop-vessel drain for 24 h and a dry dressing postoperatively. Healing was evaluated by a wound care nurse blinded for randomization at 2 and 12 weeks postoperatively (primary endpoint). Healing was defined as one or no closing defects of ≤5 mm and with no undermining.

Results: Although we had wanted to recruit 200 patients, the study was terminated at 118 patients (NPWT group, n = 60; control group, n = 58) after interim analysis. Patients were comparable by age, sex, body mass index, previous smoking status and indication for BCL surgery. At 2 weeks 12% of patients were healed in both the NPWT and control groups [risk difference = 0.00(95% CI -0.12 to 0.11), p = 1.00]. After 12 weeks, 68% of patients were healed in the NPWT group and 72% in the control group [risk difference = -0.03 (95% CI 0.19 to 0.13), p = 0.82]. There was no significant difference in pain experienced postsurgery. In a symptom-based questionnaire, the control group reported self-esteem to be less affected (p = 0.015).

Conclusion: Closed-incision negative-pressure wound therapy did not significantly improve healing after BCL surgery for complicated pilonidal sinus disease.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Colorectal Disease
Colorectal Disease 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
11.80%
发文量
406
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: Diseases of the colon and rectum are common and offer a number of exciting challenges. Clinical, diagnostic and basic science research is expanding rapidly. There is increasing demand from purchasers of health care and patients for clinicians to keep abreast of the latest research and developments, and to translate these into routine practice. Technological advances in diagnosis, surgical technique, new pharmaceuticals, molecular genetics and other basic sciences have transformed many aspects of how these diseases are managed. Such progress will accelerate. Colorectal Disease offers a real benefit to subscribers and authors. It is first and foremost a vehicle for publishing original research relating to the demanding, rapidly expanding field of colorectal diseases. Essential for surgeons, pathologists, oncologists, gastroenterologists and health professionals caring for patients with a disease of the lower GI tract, Colorectal Disease furthers education and inter-professional development by including regular review articles and discussions of current controversies. Note that the journal does not usually accept paediatric surgical papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信