使用回归树分析法研究 COVID-19 疫苗接种趋势随时间变化的人口和地理特征,美国,2021 年 5 月至 2022 年 4 月,全国免疫接种调查成人 COVID 模块。

IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY
Morgan Earp , Lu Meng , Carla L. Black , Rosalind J. Carter , Peng-Jun Lu , James A. Singleton , Terence Chorba
{"title":"使用回归树分析法研究 COVID-19 疫苗接种趋势随时间变化的人口和地理特征,美国,2021 年 5 月至 2022 年 4 月,全国免疫接种调查成人 COVID 模块。","authors":"Morgan Earp ,&nbsp;Lu Meng ,&nbsp;Carla L. Black ,&nbsp;Rosalind J. Carter ,&nbsp;Peng-Jun Lu ,&nbsp;James A. Singleton ,&nbsp;Terence Chorba","doi":"10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.126372","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Using data from the nationally representative National Immunization Survey (NIS), we applied conditional linear regression tree methodology to examine relationships between demographic and geographic factors and propensity of receiving various doses of COVID-19 vaccine over time; these analyses identified temporal changes in these relationships that heretofore had not been identified using conventional logistical regression methodologies.</div><div>Three regression tree models were built using an R package, Recursive Partitioning for Modeling Survey (rpms), to examine propensities over time of receiving a (1) first dose of a two-dose COVID-19 mRNA primary vaccination series or single dose of the Janssen vaccine (vaccine initiation), (2) primary series completion, and (3) monovalent booster dose, using a conditional linear effect model. Persons ≥50 years were more likely to complete a primary series and receive a first booster dose; persons reporting having received non-COVID-19 vaccines recently were more likely to initiate vaccination, complete the primary series, and get a first booster dose; persons reporting having work or school requirements were more likely to complete the primary series. Persons not reporting having received non-COVID-19 vaccines in 2 years but reporting having work or school vaccination requirements were more likely to initiate vaccination than those without work/school requirements. Among persons not reporting having received non-COVID-19 vaccines in 2 years and not reporting having work or school vaccination requirements, those aged ≥50 years were more likely to initiate vaccination than were younger adults. Propensity of receiving various doses was correlated with age, having recently received non-COVID 19 vaccines, and having vaccination requirements at work or school.</div><div>Regression tree methodology enabled modeling of different COVID-19 vaccination dose propensities as a linear effect of time, revealed changes in relationships over time between demographic factors and propensity of receipt of different doses, and identified populations that may benefit from vaccination outreach efforts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23491,"journal":{"name":"Vaccine","volume":"42 26","pages":"Article 126372"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using regression tree analysis to examine demographic and geographic characteristics of COVID-19 vaccination trends over time, United States, May 2021–April 2022, National Immunization Survey Adult COVID Module\",\"authors\":\"Morgan Earp ,&nbsp;Lu Meng ,&nbsp;Carla L. Black ,&nbsp;Rosalind J. Carter ,&nbsp;Peng-Jun Lu ,&nbsp;James A. Singleton ,&nbsp;Terence Chorba\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.126372\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Using data from the nationally representative National Immunization Survey (NIS), we applied conditional linear regression tree methodology to examine relationships between demographic and geographic factors and propensity of receiving various doses of COVID-19 vaccine over time; these analyses identified temporal changes in these relationships that heretofore had not been identified using conventional logistical regression methodologies.</div><div>Three regression tree models were built using an R package, Recursive Partitioning for Modeling Survey (rpms), to examine propensities over time of receiving a (1) first dose of a two-dose COVID-19 mRNA primary vaccination series or single dose of the Janssen vaccine (vaccine initiation), (2) primary series completion, and (3) monovalent booster dose, using a conditional linear effect model. Persons ≥50 years were more likely to complete a primary series and receive a first booster dose; persons reporting having received non-COVID-19 vaccines recently were more likely to initiate vaccination, complete the primary series, and get a first booster dose; persons reporting having work or school requirements were more likely to complete the primary series. Persons not reporting having received non-COVID-19 vaccines in 2 years but reporting having work or school vaccination requirements were more likely to initiate vaccination than those without work/school requirements. Among persons not reporting having received non-COVID-19 vaccines in 2 years and not reporting having work or school vaccination requirements, those aged ≥50 years were more likely to initiate vaccination than were younger adults. Propensity of receiving various doses was correlated with age, having recently received non-COVID 19 vaccines, and having vaccination requirements at work or school.</div><div>Regression tree methodology enabled modeling of different COVID-19 vaccination dose propensities as a linear effect of time, revealed changes in relationships over time between demographic factors and propensity of receipt of different doses, and identified populations that may benefit from vaccination outreach efforts.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23491,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vaccine\",\"volume\":\"42 26\",\"pages\":\"Article 126372\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vaccine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X24010545\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vaccine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X24010545","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

利用具有全国代表性的全国免疫接种调查 (NIS) 数据,我们采用条件线性回归树方法研究了人口和地理因素与随着时间推移接种不同剂量 COVID-19 疫苗的倾向性之间的关系;这些分析确定了这些关系的时间变化,而这些变化是迄今为止使用传统的逻辑回归方法无法确定的。我们使用 R 软件包 "建模调查的递归分区"(rpms)建立了三个回归树模型,利用条件线性效应模型来检验接种(1) 两剂 COVID-19 mRNA 初次接种系列的第一剂或单剂杨森疫苗(疫苗接种开始)、(2) 初次接种系列完成和(3) 单价加强剂量的概率。年龄≥50岁的人更有可能完成初种系列接种并接种第一剂加强剂;报告最近接种过非COVID-19疫苗的人更有可能开始接种、完成初种系列接种并接种第一剂加强剂;报告有工作或上学要求的人更有可能完成初种系列接种。两年内未报告接种过非 COVID-19 疫苗但报告有工作或上学接种要求的人比没有工作/上学要求的人更有可能开始接种疫苗。在未报告 2 年内接种过非 COVID-19 疫苗且未报告有工作或上学接种要求的人群中,年龄≥50 岁的人比年轻人更有可能开始接种疫苗。接种各种剂量疫苗的倾向与年龄、最近接种过非 COVID-19 疫苗以及工作或学校有接种要求相关。回归树方法可将不同的 COVID-19 疫苗接种剂量倾向作为时间的线性效应建模,揭示人口因素与不同剂量接种倾向之间的关系随时间的变化,并确定可能从疫苗接种推广工作中受益的人群。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Using regression tree analysis to examine demographic and geographic characteristics of COVID-19 vaccination trends over time, United States, May 2021–April 2022, National Immunization Survey Adult COVID Module
Using data from the nationally representative National Immunization Survey (NIS), we applied conditional linear regression tree methodology to examine relationships between demographic and geographic factors and propensity of receiving various doses of COVID-19 vaccine over time; these analyses identified temporal changes in these relationships that heretofore had not been identified using conventional logistical regression methodologies.
Three regression tree models were built using an R package, Recursive Partitioning for Modeling Survey (rpms), to examine propensities over time of receiving a (1) first dose of a two-dose COVID-19 mRNA primary vaccination series or single dose of the Janssen vaccine (vaccine initiation), (2) primary series completion, and (3) monovalent booster dose, using a conditional linear effect model. Persons ≥50 years were more likely to complete a primary series and receive a first booster dose; persons reporting having received non-COVID-19 vaccines recently were more likely to initiate vaccination, complete the primary series, and get a first booster dose; persons reporting having work or school requirements were more likely to complete the primary series. Persons not reporting having received non-COVID-19 vaccines in 2 years but reporting having work or school vaccination requirements were more likely to initiate vaccination than those without work/school requirements. Among persons not reporting having received non-COVID-19 vaccines in 2 years and not reporting having work or school vaccination requirements, those aged ≥50 years were more likely to initiate vaccination than were younger adults. Propensity of receiving various doses was correlated with age, having recently received non-COVID 19 vaccines, and having vaccination requirements at work or school.
Regression tree methodology enabled modeling of different COVID-19 vaccination dose propensities as a linear effect of time, revealed changes in relationships over time between demographic factors and propensity of receipt of different doses, and identified populations that may benefit from vaccination outreach efforts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Vaccine
Vaccine 医学-免疫学
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
5.50%
发文量
992
审稿时长
131 days
期刊介绍: Vaccine is unique in publishing the highest quality science across all disciplines relevant to the field of vaccinology - all original article submissions across basic and clinical research, vaccine manufacturing, history, public policy, behavioral science and ethics, social sciences, safety, and many other related areas are welcomed. The submission categories as given in the Guide for Authors indicate where we receive the most papers. Papers outside these major areas are also welcome and authors are encouraged to contact us with specific questions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信