擦拭消毒可重复使用的医用弹性半面罩呼吸器。

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Kimberly Erukunuakpor, Karen Emily Nielsen, Morgan A Lane, Adam Hornbeck, Caitlin McClain, Rohan Fernando, Margaret Sietsema, Colleen S Kraft, Lisa M Casanova
{"title":"擦拭消毒可重复使用的医用弹性半面罩呼吸器。","authors":"Kimberly Erukunuakpor, Karen Emily Nielsen, Morgan A Lane, Adam Hornbeck, Caitlin McClain, Rohan Fernando, Margaret Sietsema, Colleen S Kraft, Lisa M Casanova","doi":"10.1177/21650799241273972","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>During shortages, elastomeric half-mask respirators (EHMRs) are an alternative to reusing N95 filtering facepiece respirators but require between-use disinfection. The objectives of this study were to (a) measure microbial reductions on EHMR surfaces under laboratory conditions by a standardized procedure using wipes impregnated with health care disinfectants and to (b) measure microbial reductions on EHMRs disinfected by volunteer health care providers.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We inoculated EHMR (Honeywell model RU8500) surfaces with <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Bacillus atrophaeus</i> spores, and bacteriophages MS2 and Φ6, and disinfected them using two wipes with hydrogen peroxide (HP), alcohols, and quaternary ammonium compounds (QACs). Then, we randomized 54 volunteer subjects into three groups (Group 1: two wipes with instructions, Group 2: five wipes with instructions, Group 3: no instructions or set number of wipes) and used 0.5% HP wipes without precleaning on EHMRs inoculated with <i>Raoultella terrigena</i> and MS2.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>The laboratory study demonstrated that all organisms achieved at least 4 log<sub>10</sub> median reductions (HP>QAC/alcohol>QAC>QAC/saline). <i>Pseudomonas</i> was highly susceptible to HP and QAC/alcohol and Φ6 to all disinfectants. MS2 reduction was highest using HP and lowest using QAC/saline. <i>Bacillus</i> was least susceptible. The volunteer study showed a 3 to 4 log<sub>10</sub> average reductions of bacteria and virus; <i>Raoultella</i> reductions were greater than MS2, with variability within and between subjects. <i>Conclusions</i>: HP disinfectant wipes used in laboratory and by volunteers reduce bacteria and viruses on EHMRs by 3 to 4 log<sub>10</sub> on average.</p><p><strong>Implications for practice: </strong>Commercially available hospital disinfectant wipes reduce bacteria and viruses on EHMRs and can fill the need for between-use disinfection. HP and combination QAC/alcohol have the greatest efficacy under our test conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":48968,"journal":{"name":"Workplace Health & Safety","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Wipe Disinfection of Reusable Elastomeric Half-Mask Respirators for Health Care Use.\",\"authors\":\"Kimberly Erukunuakpor, Karen Emily Nielsen, Morgan A Lane, Adam Hornbeck, Caitlin McClain, Rohan Fernando, Margaret Sietsema, Colleen S Kraft, Lisa M Casanova\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/21650799241273972\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>During shortages, elastomeric half-mask respirators (EHMRs) are an alternative to reusing N95 filtering facepiece respirators but require between-use disinfection. The objectives of this study were to (a) measure microbial reductions on EHMR surfaces under laboratory conditions by a standardized procedure using wipes impregnated with health care disinfectants and to (b) measure microbial reductions on EHMRs disinfected by volunteer health care providers.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We inoculated EHMR (Honeywell model RU8500) surfaces with <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Bacillus atrophaeus</i> spores, and bacteriophages MS2 and Φ6, and disinfected them using two wipes with hydrogen peroxide (HP), alcohols, and quaternary ammonium compounds (QACs). Then, we randomized 54 volunteer subjects into three groups (Group 1: two wipes with instructions, Group 2: five wipes with instructions, Group 3: no instructions or set number of wipes) and used 0.5% HP wipes without precleaning on EHMRs inoculated with <i>Raoultella terrigena</i> and MS2.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>The laboratory study demonstrated that all organisms achieved at least 4 log<sub>10</sub> median reductions (HP>QAC/alcohol>QAC>QAC/saline). <i>Pseudomonas</i> was highly susceptible to HP and QAC/alcohol and Φ6 to all disinfectants. MS2 reduction was highest using HP and lowest using QAC/saline. <i>Bacillus</i> was least susceptible. The volunteer study showed a 3 to 4 log<sub>10</sub> average reductions of bacteria and virus; <i>Raoultella</i> reductions were greater than MS2, with variability within and between subjects. <i>Conclusions</i>: HP disinfectant wipes used in laboratory and by volunteers reduce bacteria and viruses on EHMRs by 3 to 4 log<sub>10</sub> on average.</p><p><strong>Implications for practice: </strong>Commercially available hospital disinfectant wipes reduce bacteria and viruses on EHMRs and can fill the need for between-use disinfection. HP and combination QAC/alcohol have the greatest efficacy under our test conditions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48968,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Workplace Health & Safety\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Workplace Health & Safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/21650799241273972\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Workplace Health & Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21650799241273972","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在短缺期间,弹性半面罩呼吸器(EHMR)是重复使用 N95 过滤面罩呼吸器的替代品,但需要在使用间隙进行消毒。本研究的目标是:(a) 在实验室条件下,使用浸渍了医疗消毒剂的抹布,通过标准化程序测量 EHMR 表面的微生物减少量;(b) 测量由志愿医疗服务提供者消毒的 EHMR 的微生物减少量:我们将铜绿假单胞菌、萎缩性芽孢杆菌孢子、噬菌体 MS2 和 Φ6 接种到超高频磁共振成像仪(霍尼韦尔 RU8500 型)表面,并用两块抹布沾上过氧化氢(HP)、酒精和季铵盐化合物(QAC)进行消毒。然后,我们将 54 名志愿受试者随机分为三组(第 1 组:含说明的两块湿巾;第 2 组:含说明的五块湿巾;第 3 组:无说明或不设定湿巾数量),使用 0.5% 的 HP 湿巾对接种了 Raoultella terrigena 和 MS2.Findings 的 EHMR 进行无预清洁:实验室研究表明,所有微生物的中位数都至少降低了 4 log10(HP>QAC/酒精>QAC>QAC/盐水)。假单胞菌对 HP 和 QAC/酒精高度敏感,对所有消毒剂的敏感性为 Φ6。使用 HP 时,MS2 的降低率最高,而使用 QAC/碱性消毒剂时,MS2 的降低率最低。芽孢杆菌的易感性最低。志愿者研究显示,细菌和病毒的平均减少量为 3 至 4 log10;Raoultella 的减少量大于 MS2,但受试者内部和受试者之间存在差异。结论实验室和志愿者使用的 HP 消毒湿巾平均可减少超高压磁共振上的细菌和病毒 3 到 4 log10:实践启示:市面上的医院消毒湿巾可减少超高频磁共振成像上的细菌和病毒,满足使用间隙消毒的需要。在我们的测试条件下,HP 和 QAC/ 酒精组合具有最大的功效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Wipe Disinfection of Reusable Elastomeric Half-Mask Respirators for Health Care Use.

Background: During shortages, elastomeric half-mask respirators (EHMRs) are an alternative to reusing N95 filtering facepiece respirators but require between-use disinfection. The objectives of this study were to (a) measure microbial reductions on EHMR surfaces under laboratory conditions by a standardized procedure using wipes impregnated with health care disinfectants and to (b) measure microbial reductions on EHMRs disinfected by volunteer health care providers.

Method: We inoculated EHMR (Honeywell model RU8500) surfaces with Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Bacillus atrophaeus spores, and bacteriophages MS2 and Φ6, and disinfected them using two wipes with hydrogen peroxide (HP), alcohols, and quaternary ammonium compounds (QACs). Then, we randomized 54 volunteer subjects into three groups (Group 1: two wipes with instructions, Group 2: five wipes with instructions, Group 3: no instructions or set number of wipes) and used 0.5% HP wipes without precleaning on EHMRs inoculated with Raoultella terrigena and MS2.

Findings: The laboratory study demonstrated that all organisms achieved at least 4 log10 median reductions (HP>QAC/alcohol>QAC>QAC/saline). Pseudomonas was highly susceptible to HP and QAC/alcohol and Φ6 to all disinfectants. MS2 reduction was highest using HP and lowest using QAC/saline. Bacillus was least susceptible. The volunteer study showed a 3 to 4 log10 average reductions of bacteria and virus; Raoultella reductions were greater than MS2, with variability within and between subjects. Conclusions: HP disinfectant wipes used in laboratory and by volunteers reduce bacteria and viruses on EHMRs by 3 to 4 log10 on average.

Implications for practice: Commercially available hospital disinfectant wipes reduce bacteria and viruses on EHMRs and can fill the need for between-use disinfection. HP and combination QAC/alcohol have the greatest efficacy under our test conditions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
3.80%
发文量
77
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Workplace Health & Safety: Promoting Environments Conducive to Well-Being and Productivity is the official publication of the American Association of Occupational Health Nursing, Inc. (AAOHN). It is a scientific peer-reviewed Journal. Its purpose is to support and promote the practice of occupational and environmental health nurses by providing leading edge research findings and evidence-based clinical practices. It publishes articles that span the range of issues facing occupational and environmental health professionals, including emergency and all-hazard preparedness, health promotion, safety, productivity, environmental health, case management, workers'' compensation, business and leadership, compliance and information management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信