机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术中的无管输尿管肠吻合术与体外尿流改道不会增加吻合口狭窄或术后并发症的风险。

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Zachariah Taylor, Sami Musallam, Kayla Meyer, Iman Elkhashab, Brian Thomas, Zachary Snow, Ilia Zeltser
{"title":"机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术中的无管输尿管肠吻合术与体外尿流改道不会增加吻合口狭窄或术后并发症的风险。","authors":"Zachariah Taylor, Sami Musallam, Kayla Meyer, Iman Elkhashab, Brian Thomas, Zachary Snow, Ilia Zeltser","doi":"10.1007/s11701-024-02116-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The objective is to demonstrate that omitting ureteral stent placement in robotic intracorporeal urinary diversion does not lead to increased risk of perioperative complications, namely ureteral strictures or anastomotic leaks. We retrospectively reviewed the records of 68 consecutive patients who underwent robotic radical cystectomy with ileal conduit creation or orthotopic neobladder by a single surgeon between January 2020 and September 2023. Chronologically, the first cohort of patients had ureteral stents placed to bridge the ureteroenteric anastomosis, and in the second cohort, stenting was omitted. Cohort 1 consisted of 28 patients with surgeries performed between January 2020 and April 2021, while cohort 2 had 40 patients who underwent surgery from April 2021 to September 2023. The cohorts were well matched with regard to patient age, gender, ASA score and rate of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The choice of urinary diversion was left to surgeon and patient preference, and there was no significant difference in the proportion of ileal conduits versus orthotopic neobladders within each cohort. Estimated blood loss, total operative time, inpatient length of stay and pathologic T and N staging did not statistically differ between the cohorts. Overall, there was no difference in the rates of postoperative ileus, ureteral stricture, anastomotic leak, infectious complications, and 30-day readmission rates between the groups. Tubeless ureteroenteric anastomosis in patients undergoing robotic radical cystectomy with intracorporeal diversion does not appear to increase the risk of anastomotic strictures or postoperative complications. Further prospective evaluation is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":47616,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","volume":"18 1","pages":"361"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tubeless ureteroenteric anastomosis in robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion does not increase the risk of anastomotic stenosis or postoperative complications.\",\"authors\":\"Zachariah Taylor, Sami Musallam, Kayla Meyer, Iman Elkhashab, Brian Thomas, Zachary Snow, Ilia Zeltser\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11701-024-02116-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The objective is to demonstrate that omitting ureteral stent placement in robotic intracorporeal urinary diversion does not lead to increased risk of perioperative complications, namely ureteral strictures or anastomotic leaks. We retrospectively reviewed the records of 68 consecutive patients who underwent robotic radical cystectomy with ileal conduit creation or orthotopic neobladder by a single surgeon between January 2020 and September 2023. Chronologically, the first cohort of patients had ureteral stents placed to bridge the ureteroenteric anastomosis, and in the second cohort, stenting was omitted. Cohort 1 consisted of 28 patients with surgeries performed between January 2020 and April 2021, while cohort 2 had 40 patients who underwent surgery from April 2021 to September 2023. The cohorts were well matched with regard to patient age, gender, ASA score and rate of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The choice of urinary diversion was left to surgeon and patient preference, and there was no significant difference in the proportion of ileal conduits versus orthotopic neobladders within each cohort. Estimated blood loss, total operative time, inpatient length of stay and pathologic T and N staging did not statistically differ between the cohorts. Overall, there was no difference in the rates of postoperative ileus, ureteral stricture, anastomotic leak, infectious complications, and 30-day readmission rates between the groups. Tubeless ureteroenteric anastomosis in patients undergoing robotic radical cystectomy with intracorporeal diversion does not appear to increase the risk of anastomotic strictures or postoperative complications. Further prospective evaluation is warranted.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47616,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Robotic Surgery\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"361\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Robotic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-024-02116-0\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-024-02116-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的是证明在机器人体外尿流改道术中省略输尿管支架置入不会导致围手术期并发症(即输尿管狭窄或吻合口漏)风险增加。我们回顾性地查看了在 2020 年 1 月至 2023 年 9 月期间,由一名外科医生接受机器人根治性膀胱切除术并创建回肠导尿管或正位新膀胱的 68 名连续患者的病历。按照时间顺序,第一组患者放置了输尿管支架,以桥接输尿管与肠道的吻合,而第二组患者则省略了支架植入。队列 1 共有 28 名患者,手术时间为 2020 年 1 月至 2021 年 4 月;队列 2 共有 40 名患者,手术时间为 2021 年 4 月至 2023 年 9 月。两组患者在年龄、性别、ASA评分和新辅助化疗率等方面完全匹配。尿路转流的选择取决于外科医生和患者的偏好,每个队列中回肠导管与正位新膀胱的比例没有显著差异。估计失血量、总手术时间、住院时间以及病理 T 和 N 分期在各组间无统计学差异。总体而言,两组患者的术后回肠梗阻、输尿管狭窄、吻合口漏、感染性并发症和30天再入院率均无差异。在接受机器人根治性膀胱切除术并进行体外转流的患者中进行无管输尿管肠吻合术似乎不会增加吻合口狭窄或术后并发症的风险。有必要进行进一步的前瞻性评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Tubeless ureteroenteric anastomosis in robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion does not increase the risk of anastomotic stenosis or postoperative complications.

The objective is to demonstrate that omitting ureteral stent placement in robotic intracorporeal urinary diversion does not lead to increased risk of perioperative complications, namely ureteral strictures or anastomotic leaks. We retrospectively reviewed the records of 68 consecutive patients who underwent robotic radical cystectomy with ileal conduit creation or orthotopic neobladder by a single surgeon between January 2020 and September 2023. Chronologically, the first cohort of patients had ureteral stents placed to bridge the ureteroenteric anastomosis, and in the second cohort, stenting was omitted. Cohort 1 consisted of 28 patients with surgeries performed between January 2020 and April 2021, while cohort 2 had 40 patients who underwent surgery from April 2021 to September 2023. The cohorts were well matched with regard to patient age, gender, ASA score and rate of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The choice of urinary diversion was left to surgeon and patient preference, and there was no significant difference in the proportion of ileal conduits versus orthotopic neobladders within each cohort. Estimated blood loss, total operative time, inpatient length of stay and pathologic T and N staging did not statistically differ between the cohorts. Overall, there was no difference in the rates of postoperative ileus, ureteral stricture, anastomotic leak, infectious complications, and 30-day readmission rates between the groups. Tubeless ureteroenteric anastomosis in patients undergoing robotic radical cystectomy with intracorporeal diversion does not appear to increase the risk of anastomotic strictures or postoperative complications. Further prospective evaluation is warranted.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
8.70%
发文量
145
期刊介绍: The aim of the Journal of Robotic Surgery is to become the leading worldwide journal for publication of articles related to robotic surgery, encompassing surgical simulation and integrated imaging techniques. The journal provides a centralized, focused resource for physicians wishing to publish their experience or those wishing to avail themselves of the most up-to-date findings.The journal reports on advance in a wide range of surgical specialties including adult and pediatric urology, general surgery, cardiac surgery, gynecology, ENT, orthopedics and neurosurgery.The use of robotics in surgery is broad-based and will undoubtedly expand over the next decade as new technical innovations and techniques increase the applicability of its use. The journal intends to capture this trend as it develops.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信