Virginia Solitano, Remo Panaccione, Bruce E Sands, Zhongya Wang, Malcolm Hogan, Guangyong Zou, Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet, Silvio Danese, Linda J Cornfield, Brian G Feagan, Siddharth Singh, Vipul Jairath, Christopher Ma
{"title":"中度至重度溃疡性结肠炎患者对不同疾病活动指数的反应。","authors":"Virginia Solitano, Remo Panaccione, Bruce E Sands, Zhongya Wang, Malcolm Hogan, Guangyong Zou, Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet, Silvio Danese, Linda J Cornfield, Brian G Feagan, Siddharth Singh, Vipul Jairath, Christopher Ma","doi":"10.1016/j.medj.2024.09.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinical, endoscopic, histological, and composite instruments are currently used to measure disease activity in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). We compared the responsiveness of the Mayo Clinic score (MCS), modified MCS (mMS; excluding physician global assessment), partial MCS (pMS; MCS without endoscopic subscore), Robart's Histopathology Index (RHI), and UC-100 score to change after ustekinumab treatment in patients with moderately to severely active UC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Post hoc analysis of the phase 3 UNIFI induction trial (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02407236) was conducted. Participants with moderately to severely active UC were randomized to receive ustekinumab or placebo. Treatment assignment was the criterion to assess responsiveness, which was quantified using the probability of a treated participant having a larger change in score than a placebo participant, termed the win probability (WinP), and estimated using nonparametric methods.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>The UC-100 score demonstrated large responsiveness (WinP 0.72 [95% confidence interval: 0.66-0.78]), and the MCS (0.68 [0.62-0.73]), mMS (0.69 [0.63-0.75]), and pMS (0.65 [0.59-0.71]) demonstrated similar effect sizes. Of the component items of the Mayo score, the endoscopic subscore (WinP 0.76 [0.69-0.82]) and the stool frequency subscore (WinP 0.74 [0.69-0.79]) were the most responsive. The Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) quality-of-life questionnaire was also responsive (WinP 0.78 [0.72-0.82]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>UC disease activity indices are similarly responsive. Depending on the treatment setting, time point of evaluation, and feasibility of measurement, different scores may be used to demonstrate response. These results support the use of mMS as a composite primary endpoint, incorporating both patient-reported and endoscopic outcome measures. The UC-100 score may be more appropriate in settings that also routinely incorporate histological evaluation.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>There is no funding for this study.</p>","PeriodicalId":29964,"journal":{"name":"Med","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Responsiveness of different disease activity indices in moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis.\",\"authors\":\"Virginia Solitano, Remo Panaccione, Bruce E Sands, Zhongya Wang, Malcolm Hogan, Guangyong Zou, Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet, Silvio Danese, Linda J Cornfield, Brian G Feagan, Siddharth Singh, Vipul Jairath, Christopher Ma\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.medj.2024.09.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinical, endoscopic, histological, and composite instruments are currently used to measure disease activity in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). We compared the responsiveness of the Mayo Clinic score (MCS), modified MCS (mMS; excluding physician global assessment), partial MCS (pMS; MCS without endoscopic subscore), Robart's Histopathology Index (RHI), and UC-100 score to change after ustekinumab treatment in patients with moderately to severely active UC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Post hoc analysis of the phase 3 UNIFI induction trial (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02407236) was conducted. Participants with moderately to severely active UC were randomized to receive ustekinumab or placebo. Treatment assignment was the criterion to assess responsiveness, which was quantified using the probability of a treated participant having a larger change in score than a placebo participant, termed the win probability (WinP), and estimated using nonparametric methods.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>The UC-100 score demonstrated large responsiveness (WinP 0.72 [95% confidence interval: 0.66-0.78]), and the MCS (0.68 [0.62-0.73]), mMS (0.69 [0.63-0.75]), and pMS (0.65 [0.59-0.71]) demonstrated similar effect sizes. Of the component items of the Mayo score, the endoscopic subscore (WinP 0.76 [0.69-0.82]) and the stool frequency subscore (WinP 0.74 [0.69-0.79]) were the most responsive. The Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) quality-of-life questionnaire was also responsive (WinP 0.78 [0.72-0.82]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>UC disease activity indices are similarly responsive. Depending on the treatment setting, time point of evaluation, and feasibility of measurement, different scores may be used to demonstrate response. These results support the use of mMS as a composite primary endpoint, incorporating both patient-reported and endoscopic outcome measures. The UC-100 score may be more appropriate in settings that also routinely incorporate histological evaluation.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>There is no funding for this study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":29964,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Med\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Med\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medj.2024.09.001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Med","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medj.2024.09.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Responsiveness of different disease activity indices in moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis.
Background: Clinical, endoscopic, histological, and composite instruments are currently used to measure disease activity in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). We compared the responsiveness of the Mayo Clinic score (MCS), modified MCS (mMS; excluding physician global assessment), partial MCS (pMS; MCS without endoscopic subscore), Robart's Histopathology Index (RHI), and UC-100 score to change after ustekinumab treatment in patients with moderately to severely active UC.
Methods: Post hoc analysis of the phase 3 UNIFI induction trial (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02407236) was conducted. Participants with moderately to severely active UC were randomized to receive ustekinumab or placebo. Treatment assignment was the criterion to assess responsiveness, which was quantified using the probability of a treated participant having a larger change in score than a placebo participant, termed the win probability (WinP), and estimated using nonparametric methods.
Findings: The UC-100 score demonstrated large responsiveness (WinP 0.72 [95% confidence interval: 0.66-0.78]), and the MCS (0.68 [0.62-0.73]), mMS (0.69 [0.63-0.75]), and pMS (0.65 [0.59-0.71]) demonstrated similar effect sizes. Of the component items of the Mayo score, the endoscopic subscore (WinP 0.76 [0.69-0.82]) and the stool frequency subscore (WinP 0.74 [0.69-0.79]) were the most responsive. The Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) quality-of-life questionnaire was also responsive (WinP 0.78 [0.72-0.82]).
Conclusions: UC disease activity indices are similarly responsive. Depending on the treatment setting, time point of evaluation, and feasibility of measurement, different scores may be used to demonstrate response. These results support the use of mMS as a composite primary endpoint, incorporating both patient-reported and endoscopic outcome measures. The UC-100 score may be more appropriate in settings that also routinely incorporate histological evaluation.
期刊介绍：
Med is a flagship medical journal published monthly by Cell Press, the global publisher of trusted and authoritative science journals including Cell, Cancer Cell, and Cell Reports Medicine. Our mission is to advance clinical research and practice by providing a communication forum for the publication of clinical trial results, innovative observations from longitudinal cohorts, and pioneering discoveries about disease mechanisms. The journal also encourages thought-leadership discussions among biomedical researchers, physicians, and other health scientists and stakeholders. Our goal is to improve health worldwide sustainably and ethically.
Med publishes rigorously vetted original research and cutting-edge review and perspective articles on critical health issues globally and regionally. Our research section covers clinical case reports, first-in-human studies, large-scale clinical trials, population-based studies, as well as translational research work with the potential to change the course of medical research and improve clinical practice.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
