使用肝素但 aPTT 和抗 Xa 活性不一致的重症患者的出血后果。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Hala Halawi, Mahmoud M Sabawi, Elsie Rizk, Ahmed A Mahmoud, Jenny H Petkova, Shiu-Ki Rocky Hui, Nina Srour, Kevin R Donahue
{"title":"使用肝素但 aPTT 和抗 Xa 活性不一致的重症患者的出血后果。","authors":"Hala Halawi, Mahmoud M Sabawi, Elsie Rizk, Ahmed A Mahmoud, Jenny H Petkova, Shiu-Ki Rocky Hui, Nina Srour, Kevin R Donahue","doi":"10.1007/s11239-024-03048-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) and unfractionated heparin (UFH) level via the anti-factor Xa activity assay (anti-Xa) are commonly used assays for UFH monitoring. While discordance between the two assays is common, its impact on critically ill patient outcomes is unclear. This study aimed to compare the incidence of major bleeding events among critically ill patients with discordant aPTT and anti-Xa activity while on UFH, to patients with no discordance. This was a single-center, retrospective cohort study of critically ill adult patients who had simultaneous anti-Xa and aPTT levels while receiving continuous UFH infusion. The primary outcome was the incidence of a major bleeding event up to 24 h after UFH discontinuation. Secondary outcomes included incidence of 30-day thrombosis and hospital length of stay (LOS). Among 264 included patients, 156 patients (59%) had at least one discordant paired level. Patients with discordance had an increased risk of major bleeding events (14% versus 5%; unadjusted risk ratio, 3.0; 95% CI 1.2-7.8; p = 0.01), and increased risk of thrombotic events (4% versus 0%; p = 0.04). Hospital LOS was similar between the two groups (13.8 days versus 11.4 days; p = 0.08). In this cohort of critically ill patients receiving continuous UFH, discordance in aPTT and anti-Xa activity was frequently observed and was associated with an increased risk of major bleeding events. While both assays remain viable monitoring options, evaluating simultaneous levels may aid in the management of critically ill patients. In patients with discordance, an individualized approach balancing bleeding and thrombotic risks should be considered.</p>","PeriodicalId":17546,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bleeding outcomes in critically ill patients on heparin with discordant aPTT and anti-Xa activity.\",\"authors\":\"Hala Halawi, Mahmoud M Sabawi, Elsie Rizk, Ahmed A Mahmoud, Jenny H Petkova, Shiu-Ki Rocky Hui, Nina Srour, Kevin R Donahue\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11239-024-03048-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) and unfractionated heparin (UFH) level via the anti-factor Xa activity assay (anti-Xa) are commonly used assays for UFH monitoring. While discordance between the two assays is common, its impact on critically ill patient outcomes is unclear. This study aimed to compare the incidence of major bleeding events among critically ill patients with discordant aPTT and anti-Xa activity while on UFH, to patients with no discordance. This was a single-center, retrospective cohort study of critically ill adult patients who had simultaneous anti-Xa and aPTT levels while receiving continuous UFH infusion. The primary outcome was the incidence of a major bleeding event up to 24 h after UFH discontinuation. Secondary outcomes included incidence of 30-day thrombosis and hospital length of stay (LOS). Among 264 included patients, 156 patients (59%) had at least one discordant paired level. Patients with discordance had an increased risk of major bleeding events (14% versus 5%; unadjusted risk ratio, 3.0; 95% CI 1.2-7.8; p = 0.01), and increased risk of thrombotic events (4% versus 0%; p = 0.04). Hospital LOS was similar between the two groups (13.8 days versus 11.4 days; p = 0.08). In this cohort of critically ill patients receiving continuous UFH, discordance in aPTT and anti-Xa activity was frequently observed and was associated with an increased risk of major bleeding events. While both assays remain viable monitoring options, evaluating simultaneous levels may aid in the management of critically ill patients. In patients with discordance, an individualized approach balancing bleeding and thrombotic risks should be considered.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17546,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11239-024-03048-0\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11239-024-03048-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

活化部分凝血活酶时间(aPTT)和通过抗因子 Xa 活性测定(anti-Xa)检测的非分数肝素(UFH)水平是监测 UFH 的常用测定方法。虽然这两种检测方法之间的不一致很常见,但其对重症患者预后的影响尚不明确。本研究旨在比较使用 UFH 时 aPTT 和抗-Xa 活性不一致的重症患者与无不一致性的患者之间大出血事件的发生率。这是一项单中心、回顾性队列研究,研究对象是在持续输注 UFH 时同时出现抗 Xa 和 aPTT 水平的成年重症患者。主要结果是 UFH 停药后 24 小时内大出血事件的发生率。次要结果包括 30 天血栓形成发生率和住院时间(LOS)。在纳入的 264 名患者中,156 名患者(59%)至少有一个配对水平不一致。不一致的患者发生大出血事件的风险增加(14% 对 5%;未调整风险比,3.0;95% CI 1.2-7.8;P = 0.01),血栓事件的风险增加(4% 对 0%;P = 0.04)。两组患者的住院时间相似(13.8 天对 11.4 天;P = 0.08)。在这组接受持续 UFH 治疗的重症患者中,经常观察到 aPTT 和抗 Xa 活性不一致的情况,这与大出血事件风险增加有关。虽然这两种检测方法仍是可行的监测方法,但同时评估这两种检测方法的水平可能有助于危重病人的管理。对于检测结果不一致的患者,应考虑采用个体化的方法来平衡出血和血栓风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bleeding outcomes in critically ill patients on heparin with discordant aPTT and anti-Xa activity.

Activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) and unfractionated heparin (UFH) level via the anti-factor Xa activity assay (anti-Xa) are commonly used assays for UFH monitoring. While discordance between the two assays is common, its impact on critically ill patient outcomes is unclear. This study aimed to compare the incidence of major bleeding events among critically ill patients with discordant aPTT and anti-Xa activity while on UFH, to patients with no discordance. This was a single-center, retrospective cohort study of critically ill adult patients who had simultaneous anti-Xa and aPTT levels while receiving continuous UFH infusion. The primary outcome was the incidence of a major bleeding event up to 24 h after UFH discontinuation. Secondary outcomes included incidence of 30-day thrombosis and hospital length of stay (LOS). Among 264 included patients, 156 patients (59%) had at least one discordant paired level. Patients with discordance had an increased risk of major bleeding events (14% versus 5%; unadjusted risk ratio, 3.0; 95% CI 1.2-7.8; p = 0.01), and increased risk of thrombotic events (4% versus 0%; p = 0.04). Hospital LOS was similar between the two groups (13.8 days versus 11.4 days; p = 0.08). In this cohort of critically ill patients receiving continuous UFH, discordance in aPTT and anti-Xa activity was frequently observed and was associated with an increased risk of major bleeding events. While both assays remain viable monitoring options, evaluating simultaneous levels may aid in the management of critically ill patients. In patients with discordance, an individualized approach balancing bleeding and thrombotic risks should be considered.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
112
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis is a long-awaited resource for contemporary cardiologists, hematologists, vascular medicine specialists and clinician-scientists actively involved in treatment decisions and clinical investigation of thrombotic disorders involving the cardiovascular and cerebrovascular systems. The principal focus of the Journal centers on the pathobiology of thrombosis and vascular disorders and the use of anticoagulants, platelet antagonists, cell-based therapies and interventions in scientific investigation, clinical-translational research and patient care. The Journal will publish original work which emphasizes the interface between fundamental scientific principles and clinical investigation, stimulating an interdisciplinary and scholarly dialogue in thrombosis and vascular science. Published works will also define platforms for translational research, drug development, clinical trials and patient-directed applications. The Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis'' integrated format will expand the reader''s knowledge base and provide important insights for both the investigation and direct clinical application of the most rapidly growing fields in medicine-thrombosis and vascular science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信