适合国王的猜测？英国王室的医疗公告以及医生在个人隐私和公开评论方面反复出现的复杂伦理问题。

IF 3 1区哲学 Q1 ETHICS

BMC Medical Ethics Pub Date : 2024-10-04 DOI:10.1186/s12910-024-01105-0

Alexander Smith, Dinesh Bhugra, Antonio Ventriglio, Michael Liebrenz

{"title":"适合国王的猜测？英国王室的医疗公告以及医生在个人隐私和公开评论方面反复出现的复杂伦理问题。","authors":"Alexander Smith, Dinesh Bhugra, Antonio Ventriglio, Michael Liebrenz","doi":"10.1186/s12910-024-01105-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article explores the ethical complexities of openly-expressed medical commentary using recent cancer diagnoses within the British monarchy as illustrative cases. Specifically, it examines tensions between public interest, personal privacy, and professional standards, underlining the adverse implications of conjectural discourse, alongside the role of physicians in enhancing wider medical understanding.","PeriodicalId":55348,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Ethics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11451130/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Speculation fit for a king? Medical announcements from the British royal family and the recurring ethical complexities of personal privacy and public commentary from physicians.\",\"authors\":\"Alexander Smith, Dinesh Bhugra, Antonio Ventriglio, Michael Liebrenz\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12910-024-01105-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article explores the ethical complexities of openly-expressed medical commentary using recent cancer diagnoses within the British monarchy as illustrative cases. Specifically, it examines tensions between public interest, personal privacy, and professional standards, underlining the adverse implications of conjectural discourse, alongside the role of physicians in enhancing wider medical understanding.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55348,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Medical Ethics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11451130/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Medical Ethics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-024-01105-0\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ETHICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-024-01105-0","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本文以英国王室最近的癌症诊断为例，探讨了公开发表医学评论在伦理方面的复杂性。具体而言，文章探讨了公众利益、个人隐私和专业标准之间的紧张关系，强调了猜测性言论的负面影响，以及医生在增进更广泛医学理解方面的作用。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Speculation fit for a king? Medical announcements from the British royal family and the recurring ethical complexities of personal privacy and public commentary from physicians.

This article explores the ethical complexities of openly-expressed medical commentary using recent cancer diagnoses within the British monarchy as illustrative cases. Specifically, it examines tensions between public interest, personal privacy, and professional standards, underlining the adverse implications of conjectural discourse, alongside the role of physicians in enhancing wider medical understanding.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

BMC Medical Ethics MEDICAL ETHICS-

CiteScore

5.20

自引率

7.40%

发文量

108

审稿时长

>12 weeks

期刊介绍： BMC Medical Ethics is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the ethical aspects of biomedical research and clinical practice, including professional choices and conduct, medical technologies, healthcare systems and health policies.