医护人员长期坚持锻炼的促进因素和障碍:COFIT 试验的 1 年定性跟踪和定量试点研究。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-04 DOI:10.1007/s00508-024-02446-x
Timothy Hasenöhrl, Beate Scharer, Margarete Steiner, Jim Schmeckenbecher, Galateja Jordakieva, Richard Crevenna
{"title":"医护人员长期坚持锻炼的促进因素和障碍:COFIT 试验的 1 年定性跟踪和定量试点研究。","authors":"Timothy Hasenöhrl, Beate Scharer, Margarete Steiner, Jim Schmeckenbecher, Galateja Jordakieva, Richard Crevenna","doi":"10.1007/s00508-024-02446-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Early exercise intervention studies showed promising positive effects of physical exercising on post-COVID-19 symptoms; however, little is known about long-term training adherence and what influences it.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 17 participants of the 8‑week original exercise intervention study. Facilitators and barriers were identified via thematic analysis and compared between those participants who continued their regular exercise behavior (continuous exercise group, CEG, n = 7) and those who stopped exercising (discontinuous exercise group, DEG, n = 10). Physical performance parameters and questionnaires regarding psychological health dimensions and work ability were assessed analogously to the original study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Qualitative analysis showed that two of the top three facilitators, (improving physical and mental health, sport has high priority) were the same in both groups. The respective third of the top three facilitators was (re)build physical and cognitive performance in the CEG and training in the group in the DEG. The top three barriers (exhaustion, sport has little priority, procrastination) were not only the same in both groups but also in the same order.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The strongest post-COVID-19 associated facilitator for long-term exercise adherence is when the need for further reconditioning is felt. The strongest post-COVID-19 associated barrier is exhaustion. Availability of exercising in a group is a key factor in increasing long-term exercise adherence.</p>","PeriodicalId":23861,"journal":{"name":"Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11534991/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Facilitators and barriers of long-term exercise adherence in healthcare workers formerly suffering from post-COVID-19 syndrome : A qualitative 1-year follow-up and quantitative pilot study of the COFIT trial.\",\"authors\":\"Timothy Hasenöhrl, Beate Scharer, Margarete Steiner, Jim Schmeckenbecher, Galateja Jordakieva, Richard Crevenna\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00508-024-02446-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Early exercise intervention studies showed promising positive effects of physical exercising on post-COVID-19 symptoms; however, little is known about long-term training adherence and what influences it.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 17 participants of the 8‑week original exercise intervention study. Facilitators and barriers were identified via thematic analysis and compared between those participants who continued their regular exercise behavior (continuous exercise group, CEG, n = 7) and those who stopped exercising (discontinuous exercise group, DEG, n = 10). Physical performance parameters and questionnaires regarding psychological health dimensions and work ability were assessed analogously to the original study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Qualitative analysis showed that two of the top three facilitators, (improving physical and mental health, sport has high priority) were the same in both groups. The respective third of the top three facilitators was (re)build physical and cognitive performance in the CEG and training in the group in the DEG. The top three barriers (exhaustion, sport has little priority, procrastination) were not only the same in both groups but also in the same order.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The strongest post-COVID-19 associated facilitator for long-term exercise adherence is when the need for further reconditioning is felt. The strongest post-COVID-19 associated barrier is exhaustion. Availability of exercising in a group is a key factor in increasing long-term exercise adherence.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23861,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11534991/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00508-024-02446-x\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00508-024-02446-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:早期的运动干预研究显示,体育锻炼对COVID-19后症状有积极作用;然而,人们对长期坚持训练及其影响因素知之甚少:对参加为期 8 周的原始运动干预研究的 17 名参与者进行了半结构式访谈。通过主题分析确定了促进因素和障碍因素,并对继续定期锻炼的参与者(持续锻炼组,CEG,n = 7)和停止锻炼的参与者(间断锻炼组,DEG,n = 10)进行了比较。与最初的研究类似,对参与者的身体表现参数以及心理健康维度和工作能力问卷进行了评估:定性分析显示,在前三名促进因素中,有两项(改善身体和心理健康,体育具有高度优先性)在两组中是相同的。在前三名促进因素中,第三名分别是在 CEG 组中(重新)建立身体和认知能力,以及在 DEG 组中进行小组培训。两组的前三位障碍因素(疲惫、体育运动不重要、拖延)不仅相同,而且顺序也相同:结论:COVID-19 后与长期坚持运动相关的最强促进因素是感觉到需要进一步调整。COVID-19后的最大障碍是疲惫。能否参加集体锻炼是提高长期坚持锻炼的关键因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Facilitators and barriers of long-term exercise adherence in healthcare workers formerly suffering from post-COVID-19 syndrome : A qualitative 1-year follow-up and quantitative pilot study of the COFIT trial.

Background: Early exercise intervention studies showed promising positive effects of physical exercising on post-COVID-19 symptoms; however, little is known about long-term training adherence and what influences it.

Material and methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 17 participants of the 8‑week original exercise intervention study. Facilitators and barriers were identified via thematic analysis and compared between those participants who continued their regular exercise behavior (continuous exercise group, CEG, n = 7) and those who stopped exercising (discontinuous exercise group, DEG, n = 10). Physical performance parameters and questionnaires regarding psychological health dimensions and work ability were assessed analogously to the original study.

Results: Qualitative analysis showed that two of the top three facilitators, (improving physical and mental health, sport has high priority) were the same in both groups. The respective third of the top three facilitators was (re)build physical and cognitive performance in the CEG and training in the group in the DEG. The top three barriers (exhaustion, sport has little priority, procrastination) were not only the same in both groups but also in the same order.

Conclusion: The strongest post-COVID-19 associated facilitator for long-term exercise adherence is when the need for further reconditioning is felt. The strongest post-COVID-19 associated barrier is exhaustion. Availability of exercising in a group is a key factor in increasing long-term exercise adherence.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift
Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.80%
发文量
110
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Wiener klinische Wochenschrift - The Central European Journal of Medicine - is an international scientific medical journal covering the entire spectrum of clinical medicine and related areas such as ethics in medicine, public health and the history of medicine. In addition to original articles, the Journal features editorials and leading articles on newly emerging topics, review articles, case reports and a broad range of special articles. Experimental material will be considered for publication if it is directly relevant to clinical medicine. The number of international contributions has been steadily increasing. Consequently, the international reputation of the journal has grown in the past several years. Founded in 1888, the Wiener klinische Wochenschrift - The Central European Journal of Medicine - is certainly one of the most prestigious medical journals in the world and takes pride in having been the first publisher of landmarks in medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信