快速反应系统对骨科手术后死亡率和并发症的影响:一项回顾性队列研究。

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Hey-Ran Choi, In-Ae Song, Tak Kyu Oh
{"title":"快速反应系统对骨科手术后死亡率和并发症的影响:一项回顾性队列研究。","authors":"Hey-Ran Choi, In-Ae Song, Tak Kyu Oh","doi":"10.1186/s13741-024-00458-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rapid response systems (RRSs) are used in hospitals to identify and treat deteriorating patients. However, RRS implementation and outcomes in orthopedic and surgical patients remain controversial. We aimed to investigate whether the RRS affects mortality and complications after orthopedic surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The National Health Insurance Service of South Korea provided the data for this population-based cohort study. Individuals who were admitted to the hospital that implemented RRS were categorized into the RRS group and those admitted to a hospital that did not implement the RRS were categorized into the non-RRS group. In-hospital mortality and postoperative complications were the endpoints.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 931,774 adult patients were included. Among them, 93,293 patients underwent orthopedic surgery in a hospital that implemented RRS and were assigned to the RRS group, whereas 838,481 patients were assigned to the non-RRS group. In multivariable logistic regression analysis, the RRS group was not associated with in-hospital mortality after orthopedic surgery compared with the non-RRS group (odds ratio [OR] 0.93, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.80, 1.08; P = 0.350). However, the RRS group was associated with a 14% lower postoperative complication rate after orthopedic surgery than the non-RRS group (OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.84, 0.86; P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The RRS was not associated with in-hospital mortality following orthopedic surgery in South Korea. However, RRS deployment was related to a decreased risk of postoperative complications in patients undergoing orthopedic surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":19764,"journal":{"name":"Perioperative Medicine","volume":"13 1","pages":"98"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11452942/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of rapid response system in mortality and complications post-orthopedic surgery: a retrospective cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Hey-Ran Choi, In-Ae Song, Tak Kyu Oh\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13741-024-00458-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rapid response systems (RRSs) are used in hospitals to identify and treat deteriorating patients. However, RRS implementation and outcomes in orthopedic and surgical patients remain controversial. We aimed to investigate whether the RRS affects mortality and complications after orthopedic surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The National Health Insurance Service of South Korea provided the data for this population-based cohort study. Individuals who were admitted to the hospital that implemented RRS were categorized into the RRS group and those admitted to a hospital that did not implement the RRS were categorized into the non-RRS group. In-hospital mortality and postoperative complications were the endpoints.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 931,774 adult patients were included. Among them, 93,293 patients underwent orthopedic surgery in a hospital that implemented RRS and were assigned to the RRS group, whereas 838,481 patients were assigned to the non-RRS group. In multivariable logistic regression analysis, the RRS group was not associated with in-hospital mortality after orthopedic surgery compared with the non-RRS group (odds ratio [OR] 0.93, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.80, 1.08; P = 0.350). However, the RRS group was associated with a 14% lower postoperative complication rate after orthopedic surgery than the non-RRS group (OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.84, 0.86; P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The RRS was not associated with in-hospital mortality following orthopedic surgery in South Korea. However, RRS deployment was related to a decreased risk of postoperative complications in patients undergoing orthopedic surgery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19764,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Perioperative Medicine\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"98\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11452942/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Perioperative Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13741-024-00458-9\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perioperative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13741-024-00458-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:医院使用快速反应系统(RRS)来识别和治疗病情恶化的病人。然而,骨科和外科患者的 RRS 实施情况和结果仍存在争议。我们旨在调查快速反应系统是否会影响骨科手术后的死亡率和并发症:方法:韩国国民健康保险服务为这项基于人群的队列研究提供数据。在实施 RRS 的医院住院的患者被分为 RRS 组,在未实施 RRS 的医院住院的患者被分为非 RRS 组。院内死亡率和术后并发症是研究的终点:共纳入 931,774 名成年患者。结果:共纳入 931,774 名成年患者,其中 93,293 名患者在实施 RRS 的医院接受了骨科手术,被归入 RRS 组,而 838,481 名患者被归入非 RRS 组。在多变量逻辑回归分析中,与非 RRS 组相比,RRS 组与骨科手术后的院内死亡率无关(几率比 [OR] 0.93,95% 置信区间 [CI] 0.80,1.08;P = 0.350)。然而,与非 RRS 组相比,RRS 组的骨科手术术后并发症发生率降低了 14%(OR 0.86,95% CI 0.84,0.86;P 结论:RRS 与骨科手术术后并发症发生率无关:在韩国,RRS 与骨科手术后的院内死亡率无关。然而,在接受骨科手术的患者中,使用 RRS 与术后并发症风险的降低有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of rapid response system in mortality and complications post-orthopedic surgery: a retrospective cohort study.

Background: Rapid response systems (RRSs) are used in hospitals to identify and treat deteriorating patients. However, RRS implementation and outcomes in orthopedic and surgical patients remain controversial. We aimed to investigate whether the RRS affects mortality and complications after orthopedic surgery.

Methods: The National Health Insurance Service of South Korea provided the data for this population-based cohort study. Individuals who were admitted to the hospital that implemented RRS were categorized into the RRS group and those admitted to a hospital that did not implement the RRS were categorized into the non-RRS group. In-hospital mortality and postoperative complications were the endpoints.

Results: A total of 931,774 adult patients were included. Among them, 93,293 patients underwent orthopedic surgery in a hospital that implemented RRS and were assigned to the RRS group, whereas 838,481 patients were assigned to the non-RRS group. In multivariable logistic regression analysis, the RRS group was not associated with in-hospital mortality after orthopedic surgery compared with the non-RRS group (odds ratio [OR] 0.93, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.80, 1.08; P = 0.350). However, the RRS group was associated with a 14% lower postoperative complication rate after orthopedic surgery than the non-RRS group (OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.84, 0.86; P < 0.001).

Conclusions: The RRS was not associated with in-hospital mortality following orthopedic surgery in South Korea. However, RRS deployment was related to a decreased risk of postoperative complications in patients undergoing orthopedic surgery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
3.80%
发文量
55
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信