各州的堕胎禁令会危害妇产科医生的职业健康吗?一项多州定性研究的结果。

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Erika L Sabbath, Samantha M McKetchnie, Kavita S Arora, Mara Buchbinder
{"title":"各州的堕胎禁令会危害妇产科医生的职业健康吗?一项多州定性研究的结果。","authors":"Erika L Sabbath, Samantha M McKetchnie, Kavita S Arora, Mara Buchbinder","doi":"10.1136/oemed-2024-109656","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Since the US Supreme Court's Dobbs v. Jackson decision, 17 states have imposed near-total abortion bans. These bans may negatively impact health and well-being of obstetrician-gynaecologists (OB-GYNs), due to high levels of work-related stress that the laws have created for them. The goal of the present study is to evaluate the impacts of post-Dobbs v. Jackson state abortion bans on occupational health and well-being of OB-GYNs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Study of OB-GYNs in Post-Roe America is a qualitative study of 54 OB-GYNs practising in 13 of the 14 states with near-total abortion bans as of March 2023. Using volunteer sampling methods, participants were recruited for semistructured qualitative interviews via videoconference from March to August 2023.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thematic analysis of interview transcripts identified six major domains of health and well-being impacts of state abortion bans on OB-GYNs: anxiety and depression, burden of negative emotions, burn-out, coping-related health behaviours, sleep disruption and personal relationships.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>State abortion bans following the 2022 Dobbs decision may impact the health and well-being not only of pregnant patients but also of their providers. These provider health impacts include mental health and burn-out but also extend to physical health outcomes and the work-life interface.</p>","PeriodicalId":19459,"journal":{"name":"Occupational and Environmental Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"493-497"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are state abortion bans an occupational health hazard for obstetrician-gynaecologists? Findings from a multistate qualitative study.\",\"authors\":\"Erika L Sabbath, Samantha M McKetchnie, Kavita S Arora, Mara Buchbinder\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/oemed-2024-109656\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Since the US Supreme Court's Dobbs v. Jackson decision, 17 states have imposed near-total abortion bans. These bans may negatively impact health and well-being of obstetrician-gynaecologists (OB-GYNs), due to high levels of work-related stress that the laws have created for them. The goal of the present study is to evaluate the impacts of post-Dobbs v. Jackson state abortion bans on occupational health and well-being of OB-GYNs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Study of OB-GYNs in Post-Roe America is a qualitative study of 54 OB-GYNs practising in 13 of the 14 states with near-total abortion bans as of March 2023. Using volunteer sampling methods, participants were recruited for semistructured qualitative interviews via videoconference from March to August 2023.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thematic analysis of interview transcripts identified six major domains of health and well-being impacts of state abortion bans on OB-GYNs: anxiety and depression, burden of negative emotions, burn-out, coping-related health behaviours, sleep disruption and personal relationships.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>State abortion bans following the 2022 Dobbs decision may impact the health and well-being not only of pregnant patients but also of their providers. These provider health impacts include mental health and burn-out but also extend to physical health outcomes and the work-life interface.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19459,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Occupational and Environmental Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"493-497\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Occupational and Environmental Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2024-109656\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Occupational and Environmental Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2024-109656","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标:自美国最高法院对多布斯诉杰克逊案做出判决以来,已有 17 个州实施了近乎全面的堕胎禁令。这些禁令可能会对妇产科医生(OB-GYN)的健康和福祉产生负面影响,因为这些法律给他们带来了很大的工作压力。本研究的目的是评估多布斯诉杰克逊案后各州堕胎禁令对妇产科医生职业健康和福祉的影响:后 Roe 时代美国妇产科医生研究》是一项定性研究,研究对象是 54 名妇产科医生,他们在 14 个州中的 13 个执业,这些州在 2023 年 3 月前几乎完全禁止堕胎。研究采用志愿者抽样方法,在 2023 年 3 月至 8 月期间通过视频会议招募参与者进行半结构化定性访谈:对访谈记录进行的主题分析确定了州堕胎禁令对妇产科医生的健康和福祉影响的六个主要领域:焦虑和抑郁、负面情绪负担、职业倦怠、与健康相关的应对行为、睡眠中断和人际关系:2022 年多布斯案判决后的州堕胎禁令不仅会影响怀孕患者的健康和福祉,还会影响其医疗服务提供者的健康和福祉。这些对医疗服务提供者健康的影响包括心理健康和职业倦怠,但也延伸到身体健康结果和工作与生活的衔接。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Are state abortion bans an occupational health hazard for obstetrician-gynaecologists? Findings from a multistate qualitative study.

Objectives: Since the US Supreme Court's Dobbs v. Jackson decision, 17 states have imposed near-total abortion bans. These bans may negatively impact health and well-being of obstetrician-gynaecologists (OB-GYNs), due to high levels of work-related stress that the laws have created for them. The goal of the present study is to evaluate the impacts of post-Dobbs v. Jackson state abortion bans on occupational health and well-being of OB-GYNs.

Methods: The Study of OB-GYNs in Post-Roe America is a qualitative study of 54 OB-GYNs practising in 13 of the 14 states with near-total abortion bans as of March 2023. Using volunteer sampling methods, participants were recruited for semistructured qualitative interviews via videoconference from March to August 2023.

Results: Thematic analysis of interview transcripts identified six major domains of health and well-being impacts of state abortion bans on OB-GYNs: anxiety and depression, burden of negative emotions, burn-out, coping-related health behaviours, sleep disruption and personal relationships.

Conclusions: State abortion bans following the 2022 Dobbs decision may impact the health and well-being not only of pregnant patients but also of their providers. These provider health impacts include mental health and burn-out but also extend to physical health outcomes and the work-life interface.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Occupational and Environmental Medicine
Occupational and Environmental Medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
2.00%
发文量
98
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Occupational and Environmental Medicine is an international peer reviewed journal covering current developments in occupational and environmental health worldwide. Occupational and Environmental Medicine publishes high-quality research relating to the full range of chemical, physical, ergonomic, biological and psychosocial hazards in the workplace and to environmental contaminants and their health effects. The journal welcomes research aimed at improving the evidence-based practice of occupational and environmental research; including the development and application of novel biological and statistical techniques in addition to evaluation of interventions in controlling occupational and environmental risks.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信