Christopher Tran, Carlos Nunez, Guy D Eslick, Ruth Barker, Elizabeth J Elliott
{"title":"儿童接触纽扣电池:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Christopher Tran, Carlos Nunez, Guy D Eslick, Ruth Barker, Elizabeth J Elliott","doi":"10.1136/ip-2024-045339","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is a rising burden of severe and fatal outcomes resulting from button battery exposures (ingestions or insertions). We summarised current evidence following button battery exposures in children and provided pooled prevalence estimates for key clinical characteristics, complications and risk estimates for predictors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>MEDLINE, Embase and Scopus databases were searched up to 19 May 2023. Included studies described complications of button battery exposures in children aged <18 years and reported prevalence data, an OR estimate or allowed OR calculation. Random effects models were used to estimate pooled estimates and event rates.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Forty-four articles (3125 children) were included in the analysis. Battery exposures were more common in males (59%) and young children. For ingestions, batteries were most often located in the stomach (43%). Mucosal damage (46%) and oesophageal stricture (10%) were the most common complications. Most (60%) children were asymptomatic at presentation. When symptoms were present, vomiting (26%) and dysphagia (18%) were the most common. Duration of ingestion to removal increased the likelihood of any complication; OR 3.71 (95% CI 1.11 to 12.42) for ≥10 hours and 5.12 (95% CI 1.79 to 14.67) for ≥12 hours. Battery diameter ≥20 mm was associated with any complication OR 4.34 (95% CI 1.16 to 16.27) and oesophageal location OR 18.66 (95% CI 6.99 to 49.82). Death was associated with oesophageal impaction OR 15.52 (95% CI 2.40 to 100.27). For insertions, nasal septal perforation was the most common complication (13%).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Button batteries are a potentially fatal domestic hazard particularly for young children. Increased prevention efforts through safer battery design are needed to mitigate this risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":13682,"journal":{"name":"Injury Prevention","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Button battery exposure in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Christopher Tran, Carlos Nunez, Guy D Eslick, Ruth Barker, Elizabeth J Elliott\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/ip-2024-045339\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is a rising burden of severe and fatal outcomes resulting from button battery exposures (ingestions or insertions). We summarised current evidence following button battery exposures in children and provided pooled prevalence estimates for key clinical characteristics, complications and risk estimates for predictors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>MEDLINE, Embase and Scopus databases were searched up to 19 May 2023. Included studies described complications of button battery exposures in children aged <18 years and reported prevalence data, an OR estimate or allowed OR calculation. Random effects models were used to estimate pooled estimates and event rates.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Forty-four articles (3125 children) were included in the analysis. Battery exposures were more common in males (59%) and young children. For ingestions, batteries were most often located in the stomach (43%). Mucosal damage (46%) and oesophageal stricture (10%) were the most common complications. Most (60%) children were asymptomatic at presentation. When symptoms were present, vomiting (26%) and dysphagia (18%) were the most common. Duration of ingestion to removal increased the likelihood of any complication; OR 3.71 (95% CI 1.11 to 12.42) for ≥10 hours and 5.12 (95% CI 1.79 to 14.67) for ≥12 hours. Battery diameter ≥20 mm was associated with any complication OR 4.34 (95% CI 1.16 to 16.27) and oesophageal location OR 18.66 (95% CI 6.99 to 49.82). Death was associated with oesophageal impaction OR 15.52 (95% CI 2.40 to 100.27). For insertions, nasal septal perforation was the most common complication (13%).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Button batteries are a potentially fatal domestic hazard particularly for young children. Increased prevention efforts through safer battery design are needed to mitigate this risk.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13682,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Injury Prevention\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Injury Prevention\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/ip-2024-045339\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Injury Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/ip-2024-045339","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:纽扣电池暴露(摄入或插入)导致严重和致命后果的负担不断增加。我们总结了儿童接触纽扣电池后的现有证据,并对主要临床特征、并发症和预测因素的风险估计进行了汇总:方法:检索了截至 2023 年 5 月 19 日的 MEDLINE、Embase 和 Scopus 数据库。纳入的研究描述了年龄在 5 岁以下的儿童因接触纽扣电池而引起的并发症:44篇文章(3125名儿童)被纳入分析。男性(59%)和幼儿接触电池的情况更为常见。在摄入方面,电池最常位于胃部(43%)。粘膜损伤(46%)和食道狭窄(10%)是最常见的并发症。大多数(60%)患儿在发病时没有症状。出现症状时,最常见的是呕吐(26%)和吞咽困难(18%)。从摄入到取出的持续时间增加了发生任何并发症的可能性;≥10 小时的 OR 为 3.71(95% CI 为 1.11 至 12.42),≥12 小时的 OR 为 5.12(95% CI 为 1.79 至 14.67)。电池直径≥20 毫米与任何并发症 OR 4.34(95% CI 1.16 至 16.27)和食道位置 OR 18.66(95% CI 6.99 至 49.82)相关。死亡与食道梗阻相关,OR 15.52 (95% CI 2.40 to 100.27)。就插入而言,鼻中隔穿孔是最常见的并发症(13%):纽扣电池是一种潜在的致命家用危险,尤其是对幼儿而言。需要通过更安全的电池设计加强预防工作,以降低这一风险。
Button battery exposure in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Background: There is a rising burden of severe and fatal outcomes resulting from button battery exposures (ingestions or insertions). We summarised current evidence following button battery exposures in children and provided pooled prevalence estimates for key clinical characteristics, complications and risk estimates for predictors.
Methods: MEDLINE, Embase and Scopus databases were searched up to 19 May 2023. Included studies described complications of button battery exposures in children aged <18 years and reported prevalence data, an OR estimate or allowed OR calculation. Random effects models were used to estimate pooled estimates and event rates.
Findings: Forty-four articles (3125 children) were included in the analysis. Battery exposures were more common in males (59%) and young children. For ingestions, batteries were most often located in the stomach (43%). Mucosal damage (46%) and oesophageal stricture (10%) were the most common complications. Most (60%) children were asymptomatic at presentation. When symptoms were present, vomiting (26%) and dysphagia (18%) were the most common. Duration of ingestion to removal increased the likelihood of any complication; OR 3.71 (95% CI 1.11 to 12.42) for ≥10 hours and 5.12 (95% CI 1.79 to 14.67) for ≥12 hours. Battery diameter ≥20 mm was associated with any complication OR 4.34 (95% CI 1.16 to 16.27) and oesophageal location OR 18.66 (95% CI 6.99 to 49.82). Death was associated with oesophageal impaction OR 15.52 (95% CI 2.40 to 100.27). For insertions, nasal septal perforation was the most common complication (13%).
Interpretation: Button batteries are a potentially fatal domestic hazard particularly for young children. Increased prevention efforts through safer battery design are needed to mitigate this risk.
期刊介绍:
Since its inception in 1995, Injury Prevention has been the pre-eminent repository of original research and compelling commentary relevant to this increasingly important field. An international peer reviewed journal, it offers the best in science, policy, and public health practice to reduce the burden of injury in all age groups around the world. The journal publishes original research, opinion, debate and special features on the prevention of unintentional, occupational and intentional (violence-related) injuries. Injury Prevention is online only.