Raquel Neves, Lia Crotti, Sahej Bains, J Martijn Bos, Federica Dagradi, Giulia Musu, Ramin Garmany, Fulvio L F Giovenzana, Paolo Cerea, John R Giudicessi, Peter J Schwartz, Michael J Ackerman
{"title":"先天性长 QT 综合征患者不遵守基于指南的植入式心律转复除颤器建议的频率和结果。","authors":"Raquel Neves, Lia Crotti, Sahej Bains, J Martijn Bos, Federica Dagradi, Giulia Musu, Ramin Garmany, Fulvio L F Giovenzana, Paolo Cerea, John R Giudicessi, Peter J Schwartz, Michael J Ackerman","doi":"10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.09.063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Guideline-directed device therapy for long QT syndrome (LQTS) has evolved during the years, and indications for an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) vary between professional cardiac societies.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to identify the subset of patients with LQTS who satisfied a class I or class II 2022 European Society of Cardiology guideline-based recommendation for an ICD and to determine the outcomes of those patients who received an ICD compared with those treated without an ICD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective analysis was conducted of 2861 patients with LQT1, LQT2, or LQT3 to identify patients meeting contemporary recommendations for guideline-directed device therapy. Basic demographics, clinical characteristics, and frequency/type of breakthrough cardiac events (BCEs) were extracted, and outcomes/complications were compared between patients treated with an ICD and those treated without one.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 290 patients (approximately 10%) who met a guideline-based recommendation, 53 (18%) satisfied a class I/level B indication for an ICD; 56 (19%), a class I/level C indication; 19 (7%), a class IIa/level C indication; and 162 (56%), a class IIb/level B indication. However, most patients (156/290 [54%]) did not receive an ICD. Of those who received an ICD, 55 of 134 (41%) experienced ≥1 appropriate ventricular fibrillation-terminating ICD therapy, whereas ICD-related complications occurred in 13 patients (10%). Of those who were treated without an ICD, only 6 of 156 patients (4%) had nonlethal BCEs, which was significantly lower compared with the ICD group (P < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>With >1200 years of combined follow-up, the experience and evidence from our 2 LQTS specialty centers suggest that many patients who satisfy a recommendation for an ICD based on the latest 2022 European Society of Cardiology guidelines may not need one. This is particularly true when the indication stemmed from a BCE while receiving beta blocker therapy or in asymptomatic patients with an increased 1-2-3-LQTS-Risk score.</p>","PeriodicalId":5,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Frequency of and outcomes associated with nonadherence to guideline-based recommendations for an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator in patients with congenital long QT syndrome.\",\"authors\":\"Raquel Neves, Lia Crotti, Sahej Bains, J Martijn Bos, Federica Dagradi, Giulia Musu, Ramin Garmany, Fulvio L F Giovenzana, Paolo Cerea, John R Giudicessi, Peter J Schwartz, Michael J Ackerman\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.09.063\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Guideline-directed device therapy for long QT syndrome (LQTS) has evolved during the years, and indications for an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) vary between professional cardiac societies.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to identify the subset of patients with LQTS who satisfied a class I or class II 2022 European Society of Cardiology guideline-based recommendation for an ICD and to determine the outcomes of those patients who received an ICD compared with those treated without an ICD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective analysis was conducted of 2861 patients with LQT1, LQT2, or LQT3 to identify patients meeting contemporary recommendations for guideline-directed device therapy. Basic demographics, clinical characteristics, and frequency/type of breakthrough cardiac events (BCEs) were extracted, and outcomes/complications were compared between patients treated with an ICD and those treated without one.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 290 patients (approximately 10%) who met a guideline-based recommendation, 53 (18%) satisfied a class I/level B indication for an ICD; 56 (19%), a class I/level C indication; 19 (7%), a class IIa/level C indication; and 162 (56%), a class IIb/level B indication. However, most patients (156/290 [54%]) did not receive an ICD. Of those who received an ICD, 55 of 134 (41%) experienced ≥1 appropriate ventricular fibrillation-terminating ICD therapy, whereas ICD-related complications occurred in 13 patients (10%). Of those who were treated without an ICD, only 6 of 156 patients (4%) had nonlethal BCEs, which was significantly lower compared with the ICD group (P < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>With >1200 years of combined follow-up, the experience and evidence from our 2 LQTS specialty centers suggest that many patients who satisfy a recommendation for an ICD based on the latest 2022 European Society of Cardiology guidelines may not need one. This is particularly true when the indication stemmed from a BCE while receiving beta blocker therapy or in asymptomatic patients with an increased 1-2-3-LQTS-Risk score.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":5,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.09.063\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.09.063","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Frequency of and outcomes associated with nonadherence to guideline-based recommendations for an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator in patients with congenital long QT syndrome.
Background: Guideline-directed device therapy for long QT syndrome (LQTS) has evolved during the years, and indications for an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) vary between professional cardiac societies.
Objective: We aimed to identify the subset of patients with LQTS who satisfied a class I or class II 2022 European Society of Cardiology guideline-based recommendation for an ICD and to determine the outcomes of those patients who received an ICD compared with those treated without an ICD.
Methods: Retrospective analysis was conducted of 2861 patients with LQT1, LQT2, or LQT3 to identify patients meeting contemporary recommendations for guideline-directed device therapy. Basic demographics, clinical characteristics, and frequency/type of breakthrough cardiac events (BCEs) were extracted, and outcomes/complications were compared between patients treated with an ICD and those treated without one.
Results: Of the 290 patients (approximately 10%) who met a guideline-based recommendation, 53 (18%) satisfied a class I/level B indication for an ICD; 56 (19%), a class I/level C indication; 19 (7%), a class IIa/level C indication; and 162 (56%), a class IIb/level B indication. However, most patients (156/290 [54%]) did not receive an ICD. Of those who received an ICD, 55 of 134 (41%) experienced ≥1 appropriate ventricular fibrillation-terminating ICD therapy, whereas ICD-related complications occurred in 13 patients (10%). Of those who were treated without an ICD, only 6 of 156 patients (4%) had nonlethal BCEs, which was significantly lower compared with the ICD group (P < .001).
Conclusion: With >1200 years of combined follow-up, the experience and evidence from our 2 LQTS specialty centers suggest that many patients who satisfy a recommendation for an ICD based on the latest 2022 European Society of Cardiology guidelines may not need one. This is particularly true when the indication stemmed from a BCE while receiving beta blocker therapy or in asymptomatic patients with an increased 1-2-3-LQTS-Risk score.
期刊介绍：
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces is a leading interdisciplinary journal that brings together chemists, engineers, physicists, and biologists to explore the development and utilization of newly-discovered materials and interfacial processes for specific applications. Our journal has experienced remarkable growth since its establishment in 2009, both in terms of the number of articles published and the impact of the research showcased. We are proud to foster a truly global community, with the majority of published articles originating from outside the United States, reflecting the rapid growth of applied research worldwide.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
