网络 Meta 分析:溃疡性结肠炎晚期疗法的组织学和组织内镜改善和缓解。

IF 6.6 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Maria Manuela Estevinho, Bernardo Sousa-Pinto, Paula Leão Moreira, Virginia Solitano, Pedro Mesquita, Catarina Costa, Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet, Silvio Danese, Vipul Jairath, Fernando Magro
{"title":"网络 Meta 分析:溃疡性结肠炎晚期疗法的组织学和组织内镜改善和缓解。","authors":"Maria Manuela Estevinho,&nbsp;Bernardo Sousa-Pinto,&nbsp;Paula Leão Moreira,&nbsp;Virginia Solitano,&nbsp;Pedro Mesquita,&nbsp;Catarina Costa,&nbsp;Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet,&nbsp;Silvio Danese,&nbsp;Vipul Jairath,&nbsp;Fernando Magro","doi":"10.1111/apt.18315","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Histology has prognostic value in ulcerative colitis (UC). However, direct comparisons of histological endpoints are lacking.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>To perform a network meta-analysis (NMA) to compare histological endpoints with biologics and small molecules.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We searched four databases up until July 2024 for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) on advanced therapies for moderate-to-severe UC reporting histological endpoints. Outcomes included histological improvement or remission, and histo-endoscopic improvement after induction or during maintenance. We used a random-effects frequentist model and have reported outcomes as relative risk and 95% confidence interval. We estimated relative drug efficacy with the <i>P</i>-score. We conducted subgroup analysis by trial phase and evaluated risk of bias and evidence certainty.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>We included 24 RCTs (15 therapies, 8874 patients). Nineteen provided data on induction and 10 on maintenance; outcome definitions were similar. Etrasimod 2 mg/day ranked highest in achieving histologic improvement (<i>P</i>-score 0.98) and remission (<i>P</i>-score 0.90) following induction. Globally, guselkumab 200–400 mg ranked first for histo-endoscopic improvement, while etrasimod 2 mg/day and upadacitinib 45 mg/day were superior in the subgroup analysis. During maintenance, upadacitinib 30 mg/day was superior in achieving histologic improvement and remission (<i>P</i>-score 0.88 for both) and histo-endoscopic improvement (<i>P</i>-score 0.94). Etrasimod 2 mg/day ranked second for histologic remission (<i>P</i>-score 0.70) and histo-endoscopic improvement (<i>P</i>-score 0.73), while mirikizumab 200 mg/month ranked second for histologic improvement.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>These results support the ability of small molecules to achieve stringent endpoints in moderate-to-severe UC. Histological outcome data for biologics was sparser, particularly during maintenance. Head-to-head RCTs are imperative to better inform clinical practice.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":121,"journal":{"name":"Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics","volume":"60 10","pages":"1276-1292"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Network Meta-Analysis: Histologic and Histo-Endoscopic Improvement and Remission With Advanced Therapy in Ulcerative Colitis\",\"authors\":\"Maria Manuela Estevinho,&nbsp;Bernardo Sousa-Pinto,&nbsp;Paula Leão Moreira,&nbsp;Virginia Solitano,&nbsp;Pedro Mesquita,&nbsp;Catarina Costa,&nbsp;Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet,&nbsp;Silvio Danese,&nbsp;Vipul Jairath,&nbsp;Fernando Magro\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/apt.18315\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Histology has prognostic value in ulcerative colitis (UC). However, direct comparisons of histological endpoints are lacking.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aim</h3>\\n \\n <p>To perform a network meta-analysis (NMA) to compare histological endpoints with biologics and small molecules.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We searched four databases up until July 2024 for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) on advanced therapies for moderate-to-severe UC reporting histological endpoints. Outcomes included histological improvement or remission, and histo-endoscopic improvement after induction or during maintenance. We used a random-effects frequentist model and have reported outcomes as relative risk and 95% confidence interval. We estimated relative drug efficacy with the <i>P</i>-score. We conducted subgroup analysis by trial phase and evaluated risk of bias and evidence certainty.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>We included 24 RCTs (15 therapies, 8874 patients). Nineteen provided data on induction and 10 on maintenance; outcome definitions were similar. Etrasimod 2 mg/day ranked highest in achieving histologic improvement (<i>P</i>-score 0.98) and remission (<i>P</i>-score 0.90) following induction. Globally, guselkumab 200–400 mg ranked first for histo-endoscopic improvement, while etrasimod 2 mg/day and upadacitinib 45 mg/day were superior in the subgroup analysis. During maintenance, upadacitinib 30 mg/day was superior in achieving histologic improvement and remission (<i>P</i>-score 0.88 for both) and histo-endoscopic improvement (<i>P</i>-score 0.94). Etrasimod 2 mg/day ranked second for histologic remission (<i>P</i>-score 0.70) and histo-endoscopic improvement (<i>P</i>-score 0.73), while mirikizumab 200 mg/month ranked second for histologic improvement.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>These results support the ability of small molecules to achieve stringent endpoints in moderate-to-severe UC. Histological outcome data for biologics was sparser, particularly during maintenance. Head-to-head RCTs are imperative to better inform clinical practice.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":121,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics\",\"volume\":\"60 10\",\"pages\":\"1276-1292\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/apt.18315\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/apt.18315","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:组织学对溃疡性结肠炎(UC)具有预后价值。目的:进行网络荟萃分析(NMA),比较生物制剂和小分子药物的组织学终点:我们检索了截至 2024 年 7 月的四个数据库,以了解有关中度至重度 UC 先进疗法的随机对照试验 (RCT),这些试验均报告了组织学终点。结果包括组织学改善或缓解,以及诱导后或维持期间的组织内镜改善。我们采用了随机效应频数模型,并以相对风险和 95% 置信区间的形式报告了结果。我们用 P 评分来估算药物的相对疗效。我们按试验阶段进行了亚组分析,并评估了偏倚风险和证据确定性:我们纳入了 24 项 RCT(15 种疗法,8874 名患者)。其中 19 项提供了诱导治疗数据,10 项提供了维持治疗数据;结果定义相似。依曲莫德 2 毫克/天疗法在诱导治疗后实现组织学改善(P-score 0.98)和缓解(P-score 0.90)方面排名最高。总体而言,古谢库单抗 200-400 毫克在组织学内镜改善方面排名第一,而依曲莫德 2 毫克/天和达达替尼 45 毫克/天在亚组别分析中更胜一筹。在维持治疗期间,达达替尼 30 毫克/天在组织学改善和缓解(两者的 P 评分均为 0.88)以及组织内镜改善(P 评分为 0.94)方面更具优势。依曲莫德2毫克/天在组织学缓解(P-score 0.70)和组织内镜改善(P-score 0.73)方面排名第二,米利珠单抗200毫克/月在组织学改善方面排名第二:这些结果支持了小分子药物在中重度 UC 中达到严格终点的能力。生物制剂的组织学结果数据较少,尤其是在维持治疗期间。为了更好地指导临床实践,必须进行头对头研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Network Meta-Analysis: Histologic and Histo-Endoscopic Improvement and Remission With Advanced Therapy in Ulcerative Colitis

Network Meta-Analysis: Histologic and Histo-Endoscopic Improvement and Remission With Advanced Therapy in Ulcerative Colitis

Background

Histology has prognostic value in ulcerative colitis (UC). However, direct comparisons of histological endpoints are lacking.

Aim

To perform a network meta-analysis (NMA) to compare histological endpoints with biologics and small molecules.

Methods

We searched four databases up until July 2024 for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) on advanced therapies for moderate-to-severe UC reporting histological endpoints. Outcomes included histological improvement or remission, and histo-endoscopic improvement after induction or during maintenance. We used a random-effects frequentist model and have reported outcomes as relative risk and 95% confidence interval. We estimated relative drug efficacy with the P-score. We conducted subgroup analysis by trial phase and evaluated risk of bias and evidence certainty.

Results

We included 24 RCTs (15 therapies, 8874 patients). Nineteen provided data on induction and 10 on maintenance; outcome definitions were similar. Etrasimod 2 mg/day ranked highest in achieving histologic improvement (P-score 0.98) and remission (P-score 0.90) following induction. Globally, guselkumab 200–400 mg ranked first for histo-endoscopic improvement, while etrasimod 2 mg/day and upadacitinib 45 mg/day were superior in the subgroup analysis. During maintenance, upadacitinib 30 mg/day was superior in achieving histologic improvement and remission (P-score 0.88 for both) and histo-endoscopic improvement (P-score 0.94). Etrasimod 2 mg/day ranked second for histologic remission (P-score 0.70) and histo-endoscopic improvement (P-score 0.73), while mirikizumab 200 mg/month ranked second for histologic improvement.

Conclusion

These results support the ability of small molecules to achieve stringent endpoints in moderate-to-severe UC. Histological outcome data for biologics was sparser, particularly during maintenance. Head-to-head RCTs are imperative to better inform clinical practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.60
自引率
7.90%
发文量
527
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics is a global pharmacology journal focused on the impact of drugs on the human gastrointestinal and hepato-biliary systems. It covers a diverse range of topics, often with immediate clinical relevance to its readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信