Jeongryul Ryu, Jaewon Hyung, Sangwon Han, Jae Ho Jeong, Sae Byul Lee, Tae-Kyung Robyn Yoo, Jisun Kim, Hee Jeong Kim, Il Yong Chung, Beom Seok Ko, Jong Won Lee, Byung Ho Son, Hyehyun Jeong, Jin-Hee Ahn, Kyung Hae Jung, Sung-Bae Kim, Dae Hyuk Moon
{"title":"18F-FES PET/CT 对复发或转移性乳腺癌临床治疗决策的影响。","authors":"Jeongryul Ryu, Jaewon Hyung, Sangwon Han, Jae Ho Jeong, Sae Byul Lee, Tae-Kyung Robyn Yoo, Jisun Kim, Hee Jeong Kim, Il Yong Chung, Beom Seok Ko, Jong Won Lee, Byung Ho Son, Hyehyun Jeong, Jin-Hee Ahn, Kyung Hae Jung, Sung-Bae Kim, Dae Hyuk Moon","doi":"10.2967/jnumed.124.267913","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The clinical impact of 16α-<sup>18</sup>F-fluoro-17β-estradiol (<sup>18</sup>F-FES) PET/CT on patient management has not been well investigated. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical impact of <sup>18</sup>F-FES PET/CT on the management of patients with recurrent or metastatic breast cancer. <b>Methods:</b> Study subjects were identified retrospectively from a database of a prospective trial for postmarketing surveillance of <sup>18</sup>F-FES between 2021 and 2023. Patients who were suspected or known to have recurrent or metastatic estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer based on a routine standard workup were included. Planned management before and actual management after <sup>18</sup>F-FES PET/CT were assessed by 2 experienced medical oncologists via medical chart review. A 5-point questionnaire was provided to evaluate the value of <sup>18</sup>F-FES PET/CT for management planning. The rate of intention-to-treat and interdisciplinary changes, and the impact of <sup>18</sup>F-FES PET/CT according to PET/CT result or clinical indication, were examined. <b>Results:</b> Of the 344 included patients, 120 (35%) experienced a change in management after <sup>18</sup>F-FES PET/CT. In 139 (40%) patients,<sup>18</sup>F-FES PET/CT supported the existing management decision without a change in management. Intention-to-treat and interdisciplinary changes accounted for 64% (77/120) and 68% (82/120) of all changes, respectively. A higher rate of change was observed when lesions were <sup>18</sup>F-FES-negative (44% [36/81]) than <sup>18</sup>F-FES-positive (30% [51/172]) or mixed <sup>18</sup>F-FES-positive/negative (36% [33/91]). Regarding clinical indications, the highest rate of change was shown when evaluating the origins of metastasis of double primary cancers (64% [9/14]). <b>Conclusion:</b> <sup>18</sup>F-FES PET/CT modified the management of recurrent or metastatic breast cancer, serving as an impactful imaging modality in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":94099,"journal":{"name":"Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1689-1694"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of <sup>18</sup>F-FES PET/CT on Clinical Decisions in the Management of Recurrent or Metastatic Breast Cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Jeongryul Ryu, Jaewon Hyung, Sangwon Han, Jae Ho Jeong, Sae Byul Lee, Tae-Kyung Robyn Yoo, Jisun Kim, Hee Jeong Kim, Il Yong Chung, Beom Seok Ko, Jong Won Lee, Byung Ho Son, Hyehyun Jeong, Jin-Hee Ahn, Kyung Hae Jung, Sung-Bae Kim, Dae Hyuk Moon\",\"doi\":\"10.2967/jnumed.124.267913\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The clinical impact of 16α-<sup>18</sup>F-fluoro-17β-estradiol (<sup>18</sup>F-FES) PET/CT on patient management has not been well investigated. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical impact of <sup>18</sup>F-FES PET/CT on the management of patients with recurrent or metastatic breast cancer. <b>Methods:</b> Study subjects were identified retrospectively from a database of a prospective trial for postmarketing surveillance of <sup>18</sup>F-FES between 2021 and 2023. Patients who were suspected or known to have recurrent or metastatic estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer based on a routine standard workup were included. Planned management before and actual management after <sup>18</sup>F-FES PET/CT were assessed by 2 experienced medical oncologists via medical chart review. A 5-point questionnaire was provided to evaluate the value of <sup>18</sup>F-FES PET/CT for management planning. The rate of intention-to-treat and interdisciplinary changes, and the impact of <sup>18</sup>F-FES PET/CT according to PET/CT result or clinical indication, were examined. <b>Results:</b> Of the 344 included patients, 120 (35%) experienced a change in management after <sup>18</sup>F-FES PET/CT. In 139 (40%) patients,<sup>18</sup>F-FES PET/CT supported the existing management decision without a change in management. Intention-to-treat and interdisciplinary changes accounted for 64% (77/120) and 68% (82/120) of all changes, respectively. A higher rate of change was observed when lesions were <sup>18</sup>F-FES-negative (44% [36/81]) than <sup>18</sup>F-FES-positive (30% [51/172]) or mixed <sup>18</sup>F-FES-positive/negative (36% [33/91]). Regarding clinical indications, the highest rate of change was shown when evaluating the origins of metastasis of double primary cancers (64% [9/14]). <b>Conclusion:</b> <sup>18</sup>F-FES PET/CT modified the management of recurrent or metastatic breast cancer, serving as an impactful imaging modality in clinical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94099,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1689-1694\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.124.267913\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.124.267913","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Impact of 18F-FES PET/CT on Clinical Decisions in the Management of Recurrent or Metastatic Breast Cancer.
The clinical impact of 16α-18F-fluoro-17β-estradiol (18F-FES) PET/CT on patient management has not been well investigated. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical impact of 18F-FES PET/CT on the management of patients with recurrent or metastatic breast cancer. Methods: Study subjects were identified retrospectively from a database of a prospective trial for postmarketing surveillance of 18F-FES between 2021 and 2023. Patients who were suspected or known to have recurrent or metastatic estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer based on a routine standard workup were included. Planned management before and actual management after 18F-FES PET/CT were assessed by 2 experienced medical oncologists via medical chart review. A 5-point questionnaire was provided to evaluate the value of 18F-FES PET/CT for management planning. The rate of intention-to-treat and interdisciplinary changes, and the impact of 18F-FES PET/CT according to PET/CT result or clinical indication, were examined. Results: Of the 344 included patients, 120 (35%) experienced a change in management after 18F-FES PET/CT. In 139 (40%) patients,18F-FES PET/CT supported the existing management decision without a change in management. Intention-to-treat and interdisciplinary changes accounted for 64% (77/120) and 68% (82/120) of all changes, respectively. A higher rate of change was observed when lesions were 18F-FES-negative (44% [36/81]) than 18F-FES-positive (30% [51/172]) or mixed 18F-FES-positive/negative (36% [33/91]). Regarding clinical indications, the highest rate of change was shown when evaluating the origins of metastasis of double primary cancers (64% [9/14]). Conclusion:18F-FES PET/CT modified the management of recurrent or metastatic breast cancer, serving as an impactful imaging modality in clinical practice.