慢性阻塞性肺病患者吸入皮质类固醇的颗粒大小与因病情加重而住院的风险以及全因死亡率。一项全国性队列研究。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Christian Kjer Heerfordt, Christian Rønn, Josefin Eklöf, Pradeesh Sivapalan, Zitta Barrella Harboe, Charlotte Hyldgaard, Andreas Fløe, Alexander G Mathioudakis, Mats Christian Højbjerg Lassen, Tor Biering-Sørensen, Jens-Ulrik Stæhr Jensen
{"title":"慢性阻塞性肺病患者吸入皮质类固醇的颗粒大小与因病情加重而住院的风险以及全因死亡率。一项全国性队列研究。","authors":"Christian Kjer Heerfordt, Christian Rønn, Josefin Eklöf, Pradeesh Sivapalan, Zitta Barrella Harboe, Charlotte Hyldgaard, Andreas Fløe, Alexander G Mathioudakis, Mats Christian Højbjerg Lassen, Tor Biering-Sørensen, Jens-Ulrik Stæhr Jensen","doi":"10.2147/COPD.S453524","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Extra-fine particle inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) improve peripheral airway distribution, but their effect on risk of exacerbations and all-cause mortality in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This observational cohort study compares patients with COPD who received extra-fine particle ICS to those who received standard particle size ICS from 2010 to 2017 while followed in outpatient clinics. The primary outcome was the time to a COPD exacerbation that required hospitalization, with all-cause mortality as a secondary outcome. Data were analyzed using an adjusted Cox proportional hazards model and a competing risk analysis. Two predefined subgroup analyses of patients treated with pressurised metered dose inhalers (pMDIs) and patients with a previous exacerbation history, was carried out. Lastly, we created a propensity score matched cohort as a sensitivity analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 40,489 patients included, 38,802 (95.8%) received stand particle size ICS and 1,687 (4.2%) received extra-fine particle ICS. In total 7,058 were hospitalized with a COPD exacerbation, and 4,346 died. No significant protective effect of extra-fine particle ICS against hospitalization due to COPD exacerbations (HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.82-1.05, p=0.23) or all-cause mortality (HR 1.00, 95% CI 0.85-1.17, p=0.99) was found when compared to standard particle size ICS. However, in the subgroup analysis of patients treated with pMDIs, extra-fine particle ICS was associated with reduction in risk of exacerbations (HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.63-0.82, p<0.001) and all-cause mortality (HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.61-0.86, p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The administration of extra-fine particle ICS was not associated with reduced risk of exacerbations or all-cause mortality in our primary analysis. A subgroup consisting of patients treated with pMDIs suggested potential protective benefits.</p>","PeriodicalId":48818,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease","volume":"19 ","pages":"2169-2179"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11448463/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inhaled Corticosteroids Particle Size and Risk of Hospitalization Due to Exacerbations and All-Cause Mortality in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. A Nationwide Cohort Study.\",\"authors\":\"Christian Kjer Heerfordt, Christian Rønn, Josefin Eklöf, Pradeesh Sivapalan, Zitta Barrella Harboe, Charlotte Hyldgaard, Andreas Fløe, Alexander G Mathioudakis, Mats Christian Højbjerg Lassen, Tor Biering-Sørensen, Jens-Ulrik Stæhr Jensen\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/COPD.S453524\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Extra-fine particle inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) improve peripheral airway distribution, but their effect on risk of exacerbations and all-cause mortality in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This observational cohort study compares patients with COPD who received extra-fine particle ICS to those who received standard particle size ICS from 2010 to 2017 while followed in outpatient clinics. The primary outcome was the time to a COPD exacerbation that required hospitalization, with all-cause mortality as a secondary outcome. Data were analyzed using an adjusted Cox proportional hazards model and a competing risk analysis. Two predefined subgroup analyses of patients treated with pressurised metered dose inhalers (pMDIs) and patients with a previous exacerbation history, was carried out. Lastly, we created a propensity score matched cohort as a sensitivity analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 40,489 patients included, 38,802 (95.8%) received stand particle size ICS and 1,687 (4.2%) received extra-fine particle ICS. In total 7,058 were hospitalized with a COPD exacerbation, and 4,346 died. No significant protective effect of extra-fine particle ICS against hospitalization due to COPD exacerbations (HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.82-1.05, p=0.23) or all-cause mortality (HR 1.00, 95% CI 0.85-1.17, p=0.99) was found when compared to standard particle size ICS. However, in the subgroup analysis of patients treated with pMDIs, extra-fine particle ICS was associated with reduction in risk of exacerbations (HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.63-0.82, p<0.001) and all-cause mortality (HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.61-0.86, p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The administration of extra-fine particle ICS was not associated with reduced risk of exacerbations or all-cause mortality in our primary analysis. A subgroup consisting of patients treated with pMDIs suggested potential protective benefits.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48818,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease\",\"volume\":\"19 \",\"pages\":\"2169-2179\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11448463/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S453524\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S453524","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:超细颗粒吸入性皮质类固醇(ICS)可改善外周气道分布,但其对慢性阻塞性肺病(COPD)患者病情加重风险和全因死亡率的影响尚不明确:这项观察性队列研究比较了2010年至2017年期间在门诊接受超细颗粒ICS和标准颗粒ICS治疗的慢性阻塞性肺病患者。研究的主要结果是慢性阻塞性肺疾病恶化到需要住院治疗的时间,次要结果是全因死亡率。数据分析采用调整后的 Cox 比例危险模型和竞争风险分析。我们还对使用加压计量吸入器(pMDIs)治疗的患者和既往有病情加重病史的患者进行了两组预定义亚组分析。最后,作为一项敏感性分析,我们创建了一个倾向得分匹配队列:在纳入的 40,489 名患者中,38,802 人(95.8%)接受了标准粒径 ICS,1,687 人(4.2%)接受了超细颗粒 ICS。共有 7058 人因慢性阻塞性肺病恶化住院,4346 人死亡。与标准粒径的 ICS 相比,超细颗粒 ICS 对慢性阻塞性肺疾病加重住院(HR 0.93,95% CI 0.82-1.05,p=0.23)或全因死亡率(HR 1.00,95% CI 0.85-1.17,p=0.99)没有明显的保护作用。然而,在对接受 pMDIs 治疗的患者进行的亚组分析中,超细颗粒 ICS 与病情加重风险的降低有关(HR 0.72,95% CI 0.63-0.82,p=0.99):在我们的主要分析中,使用超细颗粒 ICS 与降低病情恶化风险或全因死亡率无关。由接受 pMDIs 治疗的患者组成的亚组显示出潜在的保护性益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Inhaled Corticosteroids Particle Size and Risk of Hospitalization Due to Exacerbations and All-Cause Mortality in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. A Nationwide Cohort Study.

Background: Extra-fine particle inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) improve peripheral airway distribution, but their effect on risk of exacerbations and all-cause mortality in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is unclear.

Methods: This observational cohort study compares patients with COPD who received extra-fine particle ICS to those who received standard particle size ICS from 2010 to 2017 while followed in outpatient clinics. The primary outcome was the time to a COPD exacerbation that required hospitalization, with all-cause mortality as a secondary outcome. Data were analyzed using an adjusted Cox proportional hazards model and a competing risk analysis. Two predefined subgroup analyses of patients treated with pressurised metered dose inhalers (pMDIs) and patients with a previous exacerbation history, was carried out. Lastly, we created a propensity score matched cohort as a sensitivity analysis.

Results: Of the 40,489 patients included, 38,802 (95.8%) received stand particle size ICS and 1,687 (4.2%) received extra-fine particle ICS. In total 7,058 were hospitalized with a COPD exacerbation, and 4,346 died. No significant protective effect of extra-fine particle ICS against hospitalization due to COPD exacerbations (HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.82-1.05, p=0.23) or all-cause mortality (HR 1.00, 95% CI 0.85-1.17, p=0.99) was found when compared to standard particle size ICS. However, in the subgroup analysis of patients treated with pMDIs, extra-fine particle ICS was associated with reduction in risk of exacerbations (HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.63-0.82, p<0.001) and all-cause mortality (HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.61-0.86, p<0.001).

Conclusion: The administration of extra-fine particle ICS was not associated with reduced risk of exacerbations or all-cause mortality in our primary analysis. A subgroup consisting of patients treated with pMDIs suggested potential protective benefits.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
10.70%
发文量
372
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: An international, peer-reviewed journal of therapeutics and pharmacology focusing on concise rapid reporting of clinical studies and reviews in COPD. Special focus will be given to the pathophysiological processes underlying the disease, intervention programs, patient focused education, and self management protocols. This journal is directed at specialists and healthcare professionals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信