利用新一代低场磁共振成像改进金属抑制:生物模型可行性研究。

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Johanna Luitjens, Katharina Ziegeler, Daehyun Yoon, Felix Gassert, Rupsa Bhattacharjee, Rawee Manatrakul, Chotigar Ngarmsrikam, Amy Becker, Yang Yang, Gabby B Joseph, Pan Su, Pedro Itriago-Leon, Sharmila Majumdar, Thomas M Link
{"title":"利用新一代低场磁共振成像改进金属抑制:生物模型可行性研究。","authors":"Johanna Luitjens, Katharina Ziegeler, Daehyun Yoon, Felix Gassert, Rupsa Bhattacharjee, Rawee Manatrakul, Chotigar Ngarmsrikam, Amy Becker, Yang Yang, Gabby B Joseph, Pan Su, Pedro Itriago-Leon, Sharmila Majumdar, Thomas M Link","doi":"10.1007/s00256-024-04809-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Novel 0.55 MRI scanners have the potential to reduce metal artifacts around orthopedic implants. The purpose of this study was to compare metal artifact size and depiction of anatomy between 0.55 T and 3.0 T MRI in a biophantom.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Steel and titanium screws were implanted in 12 porcine knee specimens and imaging at 0.55 T and 3 T MRI was performed using the following sequences: turbo spin-echo (TSE), TSE with view angle tilting (VAT), and slice encoding for metal artifact correction (SEMAC) with proton-density (PD) and T2-weighted short-tau inversion-recovery (T2w-STIR) contrasts. Artifacts were measured, and visualization of anatomy (cartilage, bone, growth plates, cruciate ligaments) was assessed and compared between groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Metal artifacts were significantly smaller at 0.55 T. The smallest artifact sizes were achieved with SEMAC at 0.55 T for both PD and T2w-STIR sequences; corresponding relative size reductions vs. 3.0 T were 78.7% and 79.4% (stainless steel) and 45.3% and 1.4% (titanium). Depiction of anatomical structures was superior at 0.55 T.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Substantial reduction of artifact size resulting in superior depiction of anatomical structures is possible on novel 0.55 T MRI systems. Further clinical studies are required to elucidate patient-relevant advantages.</p>","PeriodicalId":21783,"journal":{"name":"Skeletal Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improved metal suppression using new generation low-field MRI: a biophantom feasibility study.\",\"authors\":\"Johanna Luitjens, Katharina Ziegeler, Daehyun Yoon, Felix Gassert, Rupsa Bhattacharjee, Rawee Manatrakul, Chotigar Ngarmsrikam, Amy Becker, Yang Yang, Gabby B Joseph, Pan Su, Pedro Itriago-Leon, Sharmila Majumdar, Thomas M Link\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00256-024-04809-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Novel 0.55 MRI scanners have the potential to reduce metal artifacts around orthopedic implants. The purpose of this study was to compare metal artifact size and depiction of anatomy between 0.55 T and 3.0 T MRI in a biophantom.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Steel and titanium screws were implanted in 12 porcine knee specimens and imaging at 0.55 T and 3 T MRI was performed using the following sequences: turbo spin-echo (TSE), TSE with view angle tilting (VAT), and slice encoding for metal artifact correction (SEMAC) with proton-density (PD) and T2-weighted short-tau inversion-recovery (T2w-STIR) contrasts. Artifacts were measured, and visualization of anatomy (cartilage, bone, growth plates, cruciate ligaments) was assessed and compared between groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Metal artifacts were significantly smaller at 0.55 T. The smallest artifact sizes were achieved with SEMAC at 0.55 T for both PD and T2w-STIR sequences; corresponding relative size reductions vs. 3.0 T were 78.7% and 79.4% (stainless steel) and 45.3% and 1.4% (titanium). Depiction of anatomical structures was superior at 0.55 T.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Substantial reduction of artifact size resulting in superior depiction of anatomical structures is possible on novel 0.55 T MRI systems. Further clinical studies are required to elucidate patient-relevant advantages.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21783,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Skeletal Radiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Skeletal Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-024-04809-x\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Skeletal Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-024-04809-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:新型 0.55 MRI 扫描仪有可能减少骨科植入物周围的金属伪影。本研究的目的是在生物模型中比较 0.55 T 和 3.0 T MRI 的金属伪影大小和解剖描绘:在 12 个猪膝关节标本中植入钢和钛螺钉,并使用以下序列在 0.55 T 和 3 T MRI 上进行成像:涡轮自旋回波 (TSE)、带视角倾斜 (VAT) 的 TSE、带质子密度 (PD) 和 T2 加权短陶反转恢复 (T2w-STIR) 对比的金属伪影校正切片编码 (SEMAC)。测量伪影,评估解剖结构(软骨、骨、生长板、十字韧带)的可视化情况,并进行组间比较:PD和T2w-STIR序列的金属伪影在0.55 T时明显较小;与3.0 T相比,相应的相对尺寸减少率分别为78.7%和79.4%(不锈钢)以及45.3%和1.4%(钛)。解剖结构的描绘在 0.55 T 时更为出色:结论:新型 0.55 T 磁共振成像系统可大幅减少伪影尺寸,从而更好地描绘解剖结构。需要进一步的临床研究来阐明与患者相关的优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Improved metal suppression using new generation low-field MRI: a biophantom feasibility study.

Objective: Novel 0.55 MRI scanners have the potential to reduce metal artifacts around orthopedic implants. The purpose of this study was to compare metal artifact size and depiction of anatomy between 0.55 T and 3.0 T MRI in a biophantom.

Materials and methods: Steel and titanium screws were implanted in 12 porcine knee specimens and imaging at 0.55 T and 3 T MRI was performed using the following sequences: turbo spin-echo (TSE), TSE with view angle tilting (VAT), and slice encoding for metal artifact correction (SEMAC) with proton-density (PD) and T2-weighted short-tau inversion-recovery (T2w-STIR) contrasts. Artifacts were measured, and visualization of anatomy (cartilage, bone, growth plates, cruciate ligaments) was assessed and compared between groups.

Results: Metal artifacts were significantly smaller at 0.55 T. The smallest artifact sizes were achieved with SEMAC at 0.55 T for both PD and T2w-STIR sequences; corresponding relative size reductions vs. 3.0 T were 78.7% and 79.4% (stainless steel) and 45.3% and 1.4% (titanium). Depiction of anatomical structures was superior at 0.55 T.

Conclusion: Substantial reduction of artifact size resulting in superior depiction of anatomical structures is possible on novel 0.55 T MRI systems. Further clinical studies are required to elucidate patient-relevant advantages.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Skeletal Radiology
Skeletal Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
9.50%
发文量
253
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Skeletal Radiology provides a forum for the dissemination of current knowledge and information dealing with disorders of the musculoskeletal system including the spine. While emphasizing the radiological aspects of the many varied skeletal abnormalities, the journal also adopts an interdisciplinary approach, reflecting the membership of the International Skeletal Society. Thus, the anatomical, pathological, physiological, clinical, metabolic and epidemiological aspects of the many entities affecting the skeleton receive appropriate consideration. This is the Journal of the International Skeletal Society and the Official Journal of the Society of Skeletal Radiology and the Australasian Musculoskelelal Imaging Group.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信