Ajra Secerov-Ermenc, Primoz Peterlin, Franc Anderluh, Jasna But-Hadzic, Ana Jeromen-Peressutti, Vaneja Velenik, Barbara Segedin
{"title":"MR、CT 和 PET/CT 对食道癌大体肿瘤体积划分的观察者间差异。","authors":"Ajra Secerov-Ermenc, Primoz Peterlin, Franc Anderluh, Jasna But-Hadzic, Ana Jeromen-Peressutti, Vaneja Velenik, Barbara Segedin","doi":"10.2478/raon-2024-0043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of our study was to assess the inter-observer variability in delineation of the gross tumour volume (GTV) of oesophageal cancer on magnetic resonance (MR) in comparison to computed tomography (CT) and positron emission tomography and CT (PET/CT).</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Twenty-three consecutive patients with oesophageal cancer treated with chemo-radiotherapy were enrolled. All patients had PET/CT and MR imaging in treatment position. Five observers independently delineated the GTV on CT alone, MR alone, CT with co-registered MR, PET/CT alone and MR with co-registered PET/CT. Volumes of GTV were measured per patient and imaging modality. Inter-observer agreement, expressed in generalized conformity index (CIgen), volumetric conformity index (VCI), planar conformity index (PCI) and inter-delineation distance (IDD) were calculated per patient and imaging modality. Linear mixed models were used for statistical analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>GTV volume was significantly lower on MR (33.03 cm<sup>3</sup>) compared to CT (37.1 cm<sup>3</sup>; p = 0.002) and on PET/CT MR (35.2 cm<sup>3</sup>; p = 0.018) compared to PET/CT (39.1 cm<sup>3</sup>). The CIgen was lowest on CT (0.56) and highest on PET/CT MR (0.67). The difference in CIgen between MR (0.61) and CT was borderline significant (p = 0.048). The VCI was significantly higher on MR (0.71; p = 0.007) and on CT MR (0.71; p = 0.004) compared to CT (0.67). The PCI was significantly higher on CT MR (0.67; p = 0.031) compared to CT (0.64). The largest differences were observed in the cranio-caudal direction.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The highest inter-observer agreement was found for PET/CT MR and the lowest for CT. MR could reduce the difference in delineation between observers and provide additional information about the local extent of the tumour.</p>","PeriodicalId":21034,"journal":{"name":"Radiology and Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inter-observer variation in gross tumour volume delineation of oesophageal cancer on MR, CT and PET/CT.\",\"authors\":\"Ajra Secerov-Ermenc, Primoz Peterlin, Franc Anderluh, Jasna But-Hadzic, Ana Jeromen-Peressutti, Vaneja Velenik, Barbara Segedin\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/raon-2024-0043\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of our study was to assess the inter-observer variability in delineation of the gross tumour volume (GTV) of oesophageal cancer on magnetic resonance (MR) in comparison to computed tomography (CT) and positron emission tomography and CT (PET/CT).</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Twenty-three consecutive patients with oesophageal cancer treated with chemo-radiotherapy were enrolled. All patients had PET/CT and MR imaging in treatment position. Five observers independently delineated the GTV on CT alone, MR alone, CT with co-registered MR, PET/CT alone and MR with co-registered PET/CT. Volumes of GTV were measured per patient and imaging modality. Inter-observer agreement, expressed in generalized conformity index (CIgen), volumetric conformity index (VCI), planar conformity index (PCI) and inter-delineation distance (IDD) were calculated per patient and imaging modality. Linear mixed models were used for statistical analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>GTV volume was significantly lower on MR (33.03 cm<sup>3</sup>) compared to CT (37.1 cm<sup>3</sup>; p = 0.002) and on PET/CT MR (35.2 cm<sup>3</sup>; p = 0.018) compared to PET/CT (39.1 cm<sup>3</sup>). The CIgen was lowest on CT (0.56) and highest on PET/CT MR (0.67). The difference in CIgen between MR (0.61) and CT was borderline significant (p = 0.048). The VCI was significantly higher on MR (0.71; p = 0.007) and on CT MR (0.71; p = 0.004) compared to CT (0.67). The PCI was significantly higher on CT MR (0.67; p = 0.031) compared to CT (0.64). The largest differences were observed in the cranio-caudal direction.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The highest inter-observer agreement was found for PET/CT MR and the lowest for CT. MR could reduce the difference in delineation between observers and provide additional information about the local extent of the tumour.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21034,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiology and Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiology and Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/raon-2024-0043\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiology and Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/raon-2024-0043","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Inter-observer variation in gross tumour volume delineation of oesophageal cancer on MR, CT and PET/CT.
Background: The aim of our study was to assess the inter-observer variability in delineation of the gross tumour volume (GTV) of oesophageal cancer on magnetic resonance (MR) in comparison to computed tomography (CT) and positron emission tomography and CT (PET/CT).
Patients and methods: Twenty-three consecutive patients with oesophageal cancer treated with chemo-radiotherapy were enrolled. All patients had PET/CT and MR imaging in treatment position. Five observers independently delineated the GTV on CT alone, MR alone, CT with co-registered MR, PET/CT alone and MR with co-registered PET/CT. Volumes of GTV were measured per patient and imaging modality. Inter-observer agreement, expressed in generalized conformity index (CIgen), volumetric conformity index (VCI), planar conformity index (PCI) and inter-delineation distance (IDD) were calculated per patient and imaging modality. Linear mixed models were used for statistical analysis.
Results: GTV volume was significantly lower on MR (33.03 cm3) compared to CT (37.1 cm3; p = 0.002) and on PET/CT MR (35.2 cm3; p = 0.018) compared to PET/CT (39.1 cm3). The CIgen was lowest on CT (0.56) and highest on PET/CT MR (0.67). The difference in CIgen between MR (0.61) and CT was borderline significant (p = 0.048). The VCI was significantly higher on MR (0.71; p = 0.007) and on CT MR (0.71; p = 0.004) compared to CT (0.67). The PCI was significantly higher on CT MR (0.67; p = 0.031) compared to CT (0.64). The largest differences were observed in the cranio-caudal direction.
Conclusions: The highest inter-observer agreement was found for PET/CT MR and the lowest for CT. MR could reduce the difference in delineation between observers and provide additional information about the local extent of the tumour.
期刊介绍:
Radiology and Oncology is a multidisciplinary journal devoted to the publishing original and high quality scientific papers and review articles, pertinent to diagnostic and interventional radiology, computerized tomography, magnetic resonance, ultrasound, nuclear medicine, radiotherapy, clinical and experimental oncology, radiobiology, medical physics and radiation protection. Therefore, the scope of the journal is to cover beside radiology the diagnostic and therapeutic aspects in oncology, which distinguishes it from other journals in the field.