斯洛文尼亚前列腺癌早期诊断途径分析。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Mateja Kokalj Kokot, Spela Mirosevic, Nika Bric, Davorina Petek
{"title":"斯洛文尼亚前列腺癌早期诊断途径分析。","authors":"Mateja Kokalj Kokot, Spela Mirosevic, Nika Bric, Davorina Petek","doi":"10.2478/raon-2024-0046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prostate cancer (PCa) is a prevalent male malignancy globally. Prolonged diagnostic intervals are associated with poorer outcomes, emphasizing the need to optimize this process. This study aimed to evaluate the doctor and primary care interval, research their impact on patient survival and explore opportunities to improve PCa diagnostic pathway in primary care.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study using cancer patients' anonymised primary care data and data of the Slovenian Cancer Registry.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study found that the doctor interval had a median duration of 0 days (interquartile range ([IQR] 0-6) and primary care interval a median duration of 5 days (IQR 0-58). Longer intervals were observed in patients with more than two comorbidities, where general practitioners didn't have access to laboratory diagnostic tests within their primary health care centre and when patients first presented with symptoms (reported symptoms at first presentation: dysuria, lower urinary tract symptoms [LUTS], abdominal pain). The analysis also revealed a statistically significant association between lower 5-year survival rate and the accessibility of laboratory and ultrasound diagnostics in primary healthcare centres and a shorter 5-year survival of symptomatic patients in comparison to patients who were identified by elevated levels of prostate specific antigen (PSA).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study shows that treating suspected PCa in primary care has a significant impact on 5-year survival. Several factors contribute to better survival, including easy access to laboratory and abdominal ultrasound in primary care centres. The study highlights the complex array of factors shaping PCa diagnosis, beyond individual clinicians' skills, encompassing test and service availability.</p>","PeriodicalId":21034,"journal":{"name":"Radiology and Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of early diagnostic pathway for prostate cancer in Slovenia.\",\"authors\":\"Mateja Kokalj Kokot, Spela Mirosevic, Nika Bric, Davorina Petek\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/raon-2024-0046\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prostate cancer (PCa) is a prevalent male malignancy globally. Prolonged diagnostic intervals are associated with poorer outcomes, emphasizing the need to optimize this process. This study aimed to evaluate the doctor and primary care interval, research their impact on patient survival and explore opportunities to improve PCa diagnostic pathway in primary care.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study using cancer patients' anonymised primary care data and data of the Slovenian Cancer Registry.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study found that the doctor interval had a median duration of 0 days (interquartile range ([IQR] 0-6) and primary care interval a median duration of 5 days (IQR 0-58). Longer intervals were observed in patients with more than two comorbidities, where general practitioners didn't have access to laboratory diagnostic tests within their primary health care centre and when patients first presented with symptoms (reported symptoms at first presentation: dysuria, lower urinary tract symptoms [LUTS], abdominal pain). The analysis also revealed a statistically significant association between lower 5-year survival rate and the accessibility of laboratory and ultrasound diagnostics in primary healthcare centres and a shorter 5-year survival of symptomatic patients in comparison to patients who were identified by elevated levels of prostate specific antigen (PSA).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study shows that treating suspected PCa in primary care has a significant impact on 5-year survival. Several factors contribute to better survival, including easy access to laboratory and abdominal ultrasound in primary care centres. The study highlights the complex array of factors shaping PCa diagnosis, beyond individual clinicians' skills, encompassing test and service availability.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21034,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiology and Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiology and Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/raon-2024-0046\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiology and Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/raon-2024-0046","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:前列腺癌(PCa)是全球流行的男性恶性肿瘤。诊断间隔时间过长与预后较差有关,因此需要优化诊断过程。本研究旨在评估医生和初级保健的间隔时间,研究它们对患者生存的影响,并探索改善初级保健中 PCa 诊断路径的机会:这是一项回顾性队列研究,使用的是癌症患者的匿名初级保健数据和斯洛文尼亚癌症登记处的数据:研究发现,医生诊断间隔期的中位数为 0 天(四分位数间距([IQR] 0-6)),初级医疗诊断间隔期的中位数为 5 天(IQR 0-58)。在有两种以上合并症的患者、全科医生无法在其初级保健中心进行实验室诊断检测以及患者首次出现症状时(首次出现时报告的症状:排尿困难、下尿路症状[LUTS]、腹痛),观察到的间隔时间较长。分析还显示,5 年存活率较低与基层医疗中心实验室和超声波诊断的可及性之间存在统计学意义上的显著关联,与前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)水平升高的患者相比,无症状患者的 5 年存活期较短:这项研究表明,在基层医疗机构治疗疑似 PCa 会对患者的 5 年生存率产生重大影响。有几个因素有助于提高存活率,包括在初级保健中心可以方便地进行实验室检查和腹部超声检查。这项研究强调了影响 PCa 诊断的一系列复杂因素,除了临床医生的个人技能外,还包括检验和服务的可用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analysis of early diagnostic pathway for prostate cancer in Slovenia.

Background: Prostate cancer (PCa) is a prevalent male malignancy globally. Prolonged diagnostic intervals are associated with poorer outcomes, emphasizing the need to optimize this process. This study aimed to evaluate the doctor and primary care interval, research their impact on patient survival and explore opportunities to improve PCa diagnostic pathway in primary care.

Patients and methods: A retrospective cohort study using cancer patients' anonymised primary care data and data of the Slovenian Cancer Registry.

Results: The study found that the doctor interval had a median duration of 0 days (interquartile range ([IQR] 0-6) and primary care interval a median duration of 5 days (IQR 0-58). Longer intervals were observed in patients with more than two comorbidities, where general practitioners didn't have access to laboratory diagnostic tests within their primary health care centre and when patients first presented with symptoms (reported symptoms at first presentation: dysuria, lower urinary tract symptoms [LUTS], abdominal pain). The analysis also revealed a statistically significant association between lower 5-year survival rate and the accessibility of laboratory and ultrasound diagnostics in primary healthcare centres and a shorter 5-year survival of symptomatic patients in comparison to patients who were identified by elevated levels of prostate specific antigen (PSA).

Conclusions: This study shows that treating suspected PCa in primary care has a significant impact on 5-year survival. Several factors contribute to better survival, including easy access to laboratory and abdominal ultrasound in primary care centres. The study highlights the complex array of factors shaping PCa diagnosis, beyond individual clinicians' skills, encompassing test and service availability.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Radiology and Oncology
Radiology and Oncology ONCOLOGY-RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Radiology and Oncology is a multidisciplinary journal devoted to the publishing original and high quality scientific papers and review articles, pertinent to diagnostic and interventional radiology, computerized tomography, magnetic resonance, ultrasound, nuclear medicine, radiotherapy, clinical and experimental oncology, radiobiology, medical physics and radiation protection. Therefore, the scope of the journal is to cover beside radiology the diagnostic and therapeutic aspects in oncology, which distinguishes it from other journals in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信