连续使用华法林或停用直接口服抗凝药 1 天后进行胃内镜黏膜下剥离术的出血率和风险因素。

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Shoichiro Hirata, Kenta Hamada, Masaya Iwamuro, Hirokazu Mouri, Koji Miyahara, Takao Tsuzuki, Kenji Yamauchi, Sayo Kobayashi, Sakuma Takahashi, Ryuta Takenaka, Shinichiro Hori, Masafumi Inoue, Tatsuya Toyokawa, Mamoru Nishimura, Shuhei Ishiyama, Jiro Miyaike, Ryo Kato, Minoru Matsubara, Naoko Yunoki, Hiromitsu Kanzaki, Yoshiro Kawahara, Hiroyuki Okada, Hideki Ishikawa, Motoyuki Otsuka
{"title":"连续使用华法林或停用直接口服抗凝药 1 天后进行胃内镜黏膜下剥离术的出血率和风险因素。","authors":"Shoichiro Hirata, Kenta Hamada, Masaya Iwamuro, Hirokazu Mouri, Koji Miyahara, Takao Tsuzuki, Kenji Yamauchi, Sayo Kobayashi, Sakuma Takahashi, Ryuta Takenaka, Shinichiro Hori, Masafumi Inoue, Tatsuya Toyokawa, Mamoru Nishimura, Shuhei Ishiyama, Jiro Miyaike, Ryo Kato, Minoru Matsubara, Naoko Yunoki, Hiromitsu Kanzaki, Yoshiro Kawahara, Hiroyuki Okada, Hideki Ishikawa, Motoyuki Otsuka","doi":"10.1111/jgh.16757","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aim: </strong>The 2017 Japanese guidelines recommend continuing warfarin therapy during the perioperative period or discontinuing direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) only on the day of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer. However, their safety has not been sufficiently explored. This study aimed to validate this management method.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective, multicenter study analyzed the characteristics and outcomes of patients who underwent gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection between July 2017 and June 2019. The patients were categorized according to the use of warfarin or DOACs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 62 eligible patients, 53 (85%) were male (median age, 76 years). Warfarin was used in 10 patients (16%) and DOACs in 52 patients (84%). Fourteen patients taking DOACs (27%) used concomitant antiplatelet agents, with seven patients (13%) continuing treatment at the time of the endoscopic procedure. No postprocedural bleeding occurred in patients receiving warfarin (0%), whereas 10 cases (19%) of bleeding occurred in patients receiving DOACs: rivaroxaban, 0% (0/22); dabigatran, 0% (0/2); edoxaban, 43% (6/14); and apixaban, 29% (4/14). The type of anticoagulant (P < 0.01) and continuation of antiplatelet therapy (P = 0.02) were risk factors for postprocedural bleeding in patients receiving DOACs. Intraprocedural bleeding requiring transfusion or symptomatic thromboembolic events were not reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Continuous warfarin therapy is preferred. DOAC withdrawal 1 day before a procedure is associated with a high bleeding rate, which may differ for different types of anticoagulants. The continuation of antiplatelet medications in patients receiving DOACs carries a high risk of bleeding and is a future challenge.</p>","PeriodicalId":15877,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rates and risk factors of bleeding after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection with continuous warfarin or 1-day withdrawal of direct oral anticoagulants.\",\"authors\":\"Shoichiro Hirata, Kenta Hamada, Masaya Iwamuro, Hirokazu Mouri, Koji Miyahara, Takao Tsuzuki, Kenji Yamauchi, Sayo Kobayashi, Sakuma Takahashi, Ryuta Takenaka, Shinichiro Hori, Masafumi Inoue, Tatsuya Toyokawa, Mamoru Nishimura, Shuhei Ishiyama, Jiro Miyaike, Ryo Kato, Minoru Matsubara, Naoko Yunoki, Hiromitsu Kanzaki, Yoshiro Kawahara, Hiroyuki Okada, Hideki Ishikawa, Motoyuki Otsuka\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jgh.16757\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and aim: </strong>The 2017 Japanese guidelines recommend continuing warfarin therapy during the perioperative period or discontinuing direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) only on the day of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer. However, their safety has not been sufficiently explored. This study aimed to validate this management method.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective, multicenter study analyzed the characteristics and outcomes of patients who underwent gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection between July 2017 and June 2019. The patients were categorized according to the use of warfarin or DOACs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 62 eligible patients, 53 (85%) were male (median age, 76 years). Warfarin was used in 10 patients (16%) and DOACs in 52 patients (84%). Fourteen patients taking DOACs (27%) used concomitant antiplatelet agents, with seven patients (13%) continuing treatment at the time of the endoscopic procedure. No postprocedural bleeding occurred in patients receiving warfarin (0%), whereas 10 cases (19%) of bleeding occurred in patients receiving DOACs: rivaroxaban, 0% (0/22); dabigatran, 0% (0/2); edoxaban, 43% (6/14); and apixaban, 29% (4/14). The type of anticoagulant (P < 0.01) and continuation of antiplatelet therapy (P = 0.02) were risk factors for postprocedural bleeding in patients receiving DOACs. Intraprocedural bleeding requiring transfusion or symptomatic thromboembolic events were not reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Continuous warfarin therapy is preferred. DOAC withdrawal 1 day before a procedure is associated with a high bleeding rate, which may differ for different types of anticoagulants. The continuation of antiplatelet medications in patients receiving DOACs carries a high risk of bleeding and is a future challenge.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15877,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jgh.16757\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jgh.16757","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:2017 年日本指南建议在围手术期继续使用华法林治疗,或仅在内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗早期胃癌当天停用直接口服抗凝药(DOAC)。然而,这些方法的安全性尚未得到充分探讨。本研究旨在验证这种管理方法:这项回顾性多中心研究分析了 2017 年 7 月至 2019 年 6 月间接受胃内镜黏膜下剥离术患者的特征和预后。根据华法林或 DOACs 的使用情况对患者进行分类:在 62 名符合条件的患者中,53 人(85%)为男性(中位年龄 76 岁)。10名患者(16%)使用了华法林,52名患者(84%)使用了DOACs。14名服用DOACs的患者(27%)同时使用了抗血小板药物,其中7名患者(13%)在内窥镜手术时仍在继续治疗。接受华法林治疗的患者没有发生术后出血(0%),而接受 DOACs 治疗的患者有 10 例(19%)发生出血:利伐沙班,0%(0/22);达比加群,0%(0/2);依度沙班,43%(6/14);阿哌沙班,29%(4/14)。抗凝剂类型(P 结论:首选持续华法林治疗。手术前 1 天停用 DOAC 会导致较高的出血率,不同类型的抗凝剂可能会有不同的出血率。接受 DOACs 治疗的患者继续服用抗血小板药物具有很高的出血风险,这也是未来的一个挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Rates and risk factors of bleeding after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection with continuous warfarin or 1-day withdrawal of direct oral anticoagulants.

Background and aim: The 2017 Japanese guidelines recommend continuing warfarin therapy during the perioperative period or discontinuing direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) only on the day of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer. However, their safety has not been sufficiently explored. This study aimed to validate this management method.

Methods: This retrospective, multicenter study analyzed the characteristics and outcomes of patients who underwent gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection between July 2017 and June 2019. The patients were categorized according to the use of warfarin or DOACs.

Results: Among the 62 eligible patients, 53 (85%) were male (median age, 76 years). Warfarin was used in 10 patients (16%) and DOACs in 52 patients (84%). Fourteen patients taking DOACs (27%) used concomitant antiplatelet agents, with seven patients (13%) continuing treatment at the time of the endoscopic procedure. No postprocedural bleeding occurred in patients receiving warfarin (0%), whereas 10 cases (19%) of bleeding occurred in patients receiving DOACs: rivaroxaban, 0% (0/22); dabigatran, 0% (0/2); edoxaban, 43% (6/14); and apixaban, 29% (4/14). The type of anticoagulant (P < 0.01) and continuation of antiplatelet therapy (P = 0.02) were risk factors for postprocedural bleeding in patients receiving DOACs. Intraprocedural bleeding requiring transfusion or symptomatic thromboembolic events were not reported.

Conclusions: Continuous warfarin therapy is preferred. DOAC withdrawal 1 day before a procedure is associated with a high bleeding rate, which may differ for different types of anticoagulants. The continuation of antiplatelet medications in patients receiving DOACs carries a high risk of bleeding and is a future challenge.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
2.40%
发文量
326
审稿时长
2.3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology is produced 12 times per year and publishes peer-reviewed original papers, reviews and editorials concerned with clinical practice and research in the fields of hepatology, gastroenterology and endoscopy. Papers cover the medical, radiological, pathological, biochemical, physiological and historical aspects of the subject areas. All submitted papers are reviewed by at least two referees expert in the field of the submitted paper.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信