An Thi-Truong Nguyen, Khanh Hoang-Phuong Nguyen, Hai Ba Le, Hong Tham Pham, Hai Thanh Nguyen, Nga Thi-Bich Nguyen, Phuong Thi-Xuan Dong, Trang Nguyen-Doan Dang, Van Thi-Thuy Pham, Dung Tuan Nguyen, Allenet Benoit, Pierrick Bedouch, Ha Thi Vo
{"title":"翻译和验证越南语 CLEO 工具，以评估药剂师干预的重要性。","authors":"An Thi-Truong Nguyen, Khanh Hoang-Phuong Nguyen, Hai Ba Le, Hong Tham Pham, Hai Thanh Nguyen, Nga Thi-Bich Nguyen, Phuong Thi-Xuan Dong, Trang Nguyen-Doan Dang, Van Thi-Thuy Pham, Dung Tuan Nguyen, Allenet Benoit, Pierrick Bedouch, Ha Thi Vo","doi":"10.1007/s11096-024-01813-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is currently no validated tool available for assessing the potential significance of pharmacist interventions in Vietnam.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to translate the CLEO tool from French into Vietnamese, validate the Vietnamese version, and demonstrate its feasibility in daily practice.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The CLEO tool was translated into Vietnamese (CLEO<sub>VN</sub>) using a 5-step process by bilingual experts. A total of 100 scenarios were compiled from clinical cases from nine hospitals evaluated by seven clinical pharmacists to determine inter-rater reliability and 30 out of 100 scenarios were re-evaluated one month later to determine test-retest reliability. Reliability was quantified using the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). A 20-item questionnaire on a 7-point Likert scale assessed the tool's appropriateness, acceptability, precision, and feasibility.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Inter-rater reliability was good for clinical dimension (ICC<sub>A,1</sub> = 0.71), excellent for economic dimension (ICC<sub>A,1</sub> = 0.86), and fair for organizational/operational dimension (ICC<sub>A,1</sub> = 0.56). Test-retest reliability scores were excellent for clinical (I̅C̅C̅<sub>A,1</sub> = 0.79), excellent for economic (I̅C̅C̅<sub>A,1</sub> = 0.84), and fair for organizational/operational (I̅C̅C̅<sub>A,1</sub> = 0.56). The tool was rated as appropriate (mean = 5.86; SD = 1.03), acceptable (mean = 5.19; SD = 1.12), precise (mean = 5.71; SD = 1.17), and feasible (mean = 5.05; SD = 1.24). The maximum time required to evaluate an intervention was three minutes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The CLEO<sub>VN</sub> tool was successfully translated and validated for reliability, appropriateness, acceptability, precision, and feasibility. It will be suitable to evaluate the value of clinical pharmacy interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":13828,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Translation and validation of the CLEO tool in Vietnamese to assess the significance of pharmacist interventions.\",\"authors\":\"An Thi-Truong Nguyen, Khanh Hoang-Phuong Nguyen, Hai Ba Le, Hong Tham Pham, Hai Thanh Nguyen, Nga Thi-Bich Nguyen, Phuong Thi-Xuan Dong, Trang Nguyen-Doan Dang, Van Thi-Thuy Pham, Dung Tuan Nguyen, Allenet Benoit, Pierrick Bedouch, Ha Thi Vo\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11096-024-01813-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is currently no validated tool available for assessing the potential significance of pharmacist interventions in Vietnam.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to translate the CLEO tool from French into Vietnamese, validate the Vietnamese version, and demonstrate its feasibility in daily practice.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The CLEO tool was translated into Vietnamese (CLEO<sub>VN</sub>) using a 5-step process by bilingual experts. A total of 100 scenarios were compiled from clinical cases from nine hospitals evaluated by seven clinical pharmacists to determine inter-rater reliability and 30 out of 100 scenarios were re-evaluated one month later to determine test-retest reliability. Reliability was quantified using the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). A 20-item questionnaire on a 7-point Likert scale assessed the tool's appropriateness, acceptability, precision, and feasibility.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Inter-rater reliability was good for clinical dimension (ICC<sub>A,1</sub> = 0.71), excellent for economic dimension (ICC<sub>A,1</sub> = 0.86), and fair for organizational/operational dimension (ICC<sub>A,1</sub> = 0.56). Test-retest reliability scores were excellent for clinical (I̅C̅C̅<sub>A,1</sub> = 0.79), excellent for economic (I̅C̅C̅<sub>A,1</sub> = 0.84), and fair for organizational/operational (I̅C̅C̅<sub>A,1</sub> = 0.56). The tool was rated as appropriate (mean = 5.86; SD = 1.03), acceptable (mean = 5.19; SD = 1.12), precise (mean = 5.71; SD = 1.17), and feasible (mean = 5.05; SD = 1.24). The maximum time required to evaluate an intervention was three minutes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The CLEO<sub>VN</sub> tool was successfully translated and validated for reliability, appropriateness, acceptability, precision, and feasibility. It will be suitable to evaluate the value of clinical pharmacy interventions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13828,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-024-01813-y\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-024-01813-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Translation and validation of the CLEO tool in Vietnamese to assess the significance of pharmacist interventions.
Background: There is currently no validated tool available for assessing the potential significance of pharmacist interventions in Vietnam.
Aim: This study aimed to translate the CLEO tool from French into Vietnamese, validate the Vietnamese version, and demonstrate its feasibility in daily practice.
Method: The CLEO tool was translated into Vietnamese (CLEOVN) using a 5-step process by bilingual experts. A total of 100 scenarios were compiled from clinical cases from nine hospitals evaluated by seven clinical pharmacists to determine inter-rater reliability and 30 out of 100 scenarios were re-evaluated one month later to determine test-retest reliability. Reliability was quantified using the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). A 20-item questionnaire on a 7-point Likert scale assessed the tool's appropriateness, acceptability, precision, and feasibility.
Results: Inter-rater reliability was good for clinical dimension (ICCA,1 = 0.71), excellent for economic dimension (ICCA,1 = 0.86), and fair for organizational/operational dimension (ICCA,1 = 0.56). Test-retest reliability scores were excellent for clinical (I̅C̅C̅A,1 = 0.79), excellent for economic (I̅C̅C̅A,1 = 0.84), and fair for organizational/operational (I̅C̅C̅A,1 = 0.56). The tool was rated as appropriate (mean = 5.86; SD = 1.03), acceptable (mean = 5.19; SD = 1.12), precise (mean = 5.71; SD = 1.17), and feasible (mean = 5.05; SD = 1.24). The maximum time required to evaluate an intervention was three minutes.
Conclusion: The CLEOVN tool was successfully translated and validated for reliability, appropriateness, acceptability, precision, and feasibility. It will be suitable to evaluate the value of clinical pharmacy interventions.
期刊介绍：
The International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy (IJCP) offers a platform for articles on research in Clinical Pharmacy, Pharmaceutical Care and related practice-oriented subjects in the pharmaceutical sciences.
IJCP is a bi-monthly, international, peer-reviewed journal that publishes original research data, new ideas and discussions on pharmacotherapy and outcome research, clinical pharmacy, pharmacoepidemiology, pharmacoeconomics, the clinical use of medicines, medical devices and laboratory tests, information on medicines and medical devices information, pharmacy services research, medication management, other clinical aspects of pharmacy.
IJCP publishes original Research articles, Review articles , Short research reports, Commentaries, book reviews, and Letters to the Editor.
International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy is affiliated with the European Society of Clinical Pharmacy (ESCP). ESCP promotes practice and research in Clinical Pharmacy, especially in Europe. The general aim of the society is to advance education, practice and research in Clinical Pharmacy .
Until 2010 the journal was called Pharmacy World & Science.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
