在急性呼吸衰竭患者同步通气过程中使用下辅助操作(LAM)估算跨肺驱动压力:一项生理学研究。

IF 2.8 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Ling Liu, Hao He, Meihao Liang, Jennifer Beck, Christer Sinderby
{"title":"在急性呼吸衰竭患者同步通气过程中使用下辅助操作(LAM)估算跨肺驱动压力:一项生理学研究。","authors":"Ling Liu, Hao He, Meihao Liang, Jennifer Beck, Christer Sinderby","doi":"10.1186/s40635-024-00674-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We previously showed in animals that transpulmonary driving pressure (PL) can be estimated during Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist (NAVA) and Neural Pressure Support (NPS) using a single lower assist maneuver (LAM). The aim of this study was to test the LAM-based estimate of PL (PL_LAM) in patients with acute respiratory failure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a prospective, physiological, and interventional study in intubated patients with acute respiratory failure. During both NAVA and simulated NPS (high and low levels of assist), a LAM was performed every 3 min by manually reducing the assist to zero for one single breath (by default, ventilator still provides 2 cmH<sub>2</sub>O). Following NAVA and NPS<sub>SIM</sub> periods, patients were sedated and passively ventilated in volume control and pressure control ventilation, to obtain PL during controlled mechanical ventilation (PL_CMV). PL using an esophageal balloon (PL_Pes) was also compared to PL_LAM and PL_CMV. We measured diaphragm electrical activity (Edi), ventilator pressure (PVent), esophageal pressure (Pes) and tidal volume. PL_LAM and PL_Pes were compared to themselves, and to PL_CMV for matching flows and volumes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten patients were included in the study. For the group, PL_LAM was closely similar to PL_CMV, with a high correlation (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.88). Bland-Altman analysis revealed a low Bias of 0.28 cmH<sub>2</sub>O, and 1.96SD of 5.26 cmH<sub>2</sub>O. PL_LAM vs PL_Pes were also tightly related (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.77).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This physiological study in patients confirms our previous pre-clinical data that PL_LAM is as good an estimate as PL_Pes to determine PL, in spontaneously breathing patients on assisted mechanical ventilation. Trial registration The study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (ID NCT05378802) on November 6, 2021.</p>","PeriodicalId":13750,"journal":{"name":"Intensive Care Medicine Experimental","volume":"12 1","pages":"89"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11452363/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Estimation of transpulmonary driving pressure using a lower assist maneuver (LAM) during synchronized ventilation in patients with acute respiratory failure: a physiological study.\",\"authors\":\"Ling Liu, Hao He, Meihao Liang, Jennifer Beck, Christer Sinderby\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40635-024-00674-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We previously showed in animals that transpulmonary driving pressure (PL) can be estimated during Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist (NAVA) and Neural Pressure Support (NPS) using a single lower assist maneuver (LAM). The aim of this study was to test the LAM-based estimate of PL (PL_LAM) in patients with acute respiratory failure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a prospective, physiological, and interventional study in intubated patients with acute respiratory failure. During both NAVA and simulated NPS (high and low levels of assist), a LAM was performed every 3 min by manually reducing the assist to zero for one single breath (by default, ventilator still provides 2 cmH<sub>2</sub>O). Following NAVA and NPS<sub>SIM</sub> periods, patients were sedated and passively ventilated in volume control and pressure control ventilation, to obtain PL during controlled mechanical ventilation (PL_CMV). PL using an esophageal balloon (PL_Pes) was also compared to PL_LAM and PL_CMV. We measured diaphragm electrical activity (Edi), ventilator pressure (PVent), esophageal pressure (Pes) and tidal volume. PL_LAM and PL_Pes were compared to themselves, and to PL_CMV for matching flows and volumes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten patients were included in the study. For the group, PL_LAM was closely similar to PL_CMV, with a high correlation (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.88). Bland-Altman analysis revealed a low Bias of 0.28 cmH<sub>2</sub>O, and 1.96SD of 5.26 cmH<sub>2</sub>O. PL_LAM vs PL_Pes were also tightly related (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.77).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This physiological study in patients confirms our previous pre-clinical data that PL_LAM is as good an estimate as PL_Pes to determine PL, in spontaneously breathing patients on assisted mechanical ventilation. Trial registration The study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (ID NCT05378802) on November 6, 2021.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13750,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Intensive Care Medicine Experimental\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"89\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11452363/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Intensive Care Medicine Experimental\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40635-024-00674-z\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intensive Care Medicine Experimental","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40635-024-00674-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:我们之前在动物身上发现,在神经调整通气辅助(NAVA)和神经压力支持(NPS)期间,使用单次下辅助动作(LAM)就能估算出跨肺驱动压力(PL)。本研究的目的是在急性呼吸衰竭患者中测试基于 LAM 的 PL 估计值(PL_LAM):这是一项针对急性呼吸衰竭插管患者的前瞻性、生理学和介入性研究。在 NAVA 和模拟 NPS(高水平和低水平辅助)期间,每 3 分钟手动将单次呼吸的辅助减至零(默认情况下,呼吸机仍提供 2 cmH2O),从而进行一次 LAM。在 NAVA 和 NPSSIM 阶段之后,对患者进行镇静并在容量控制和压力控制通气中进行被动通气,以获得受控机械通气期间的 PL(PL_CMV)。使用食道球囊的 PL(PL_Pes)也与 PL_LAM 和 PL_CMV 进行了比较。我们测量了膈肌电活动(Edi)、呼吸机压力(PVent)、食管压力(Pes)和潮气量。将 PL_LAM 和 PL_Pes 与其自身进行比较,并与 PL_CMV 进行比较,以匹配流量和潮气量:研究共纳入了 10 名患者。就该组患者而言,PL_LAM 与 PL_CMV 非常相似,相关性很高(R2 = 0.88)。Bland-Altman 分析显示,偏差为 0.28 cmH2O,1.96SD 为 5.26 cmH2O。PL_LAM 与 PL_Pes 也密切相关(R2 = 0.77):这项患者生理学研究证实了我们之前的临床前数据,即在辅助机械通气的自主呼吸患者中,PL_LAM 与 PL_Pes 一样是确定 PL 的良好估计值。试验注册 该研究于 2021 年 11 月 6 日在 clinicaltrials.gov 注册(ID NCT05378802)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Estimation of transpulmonary driving pressure using a lower assist maneuver (LAM) during synchronized ventilation in patients with acute respiratory failure: a physiological study.

Background: We previously showed in animals that transpulmonary driving pressure (PL) can be estimated during Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist (NAVA) and Neural Pressure Support (NPS) using a single lower assist maneuver (LAM). The aim of this study was to test the LAM-based estimate of PL (PL_LAM) in patients with acute respiratory failure.

Methods: This was a prospective, physiological, and interventional study in intubated patients with acute respiratory failure. During both NAVA and simulated NPS (high and low levels of assist), a LAM was performed every 3 min by manually reducing the assist to zero for one single breath (by default, ventilator still provides 2 cmH2O). Following NAVA and NPSSIM periods, patients were sedated and passively ventilated in volume control and pressure control ventilation, to obtain PL during controlled mechanical ventilation (PL_CMV). PL using an esophageal balloon (PL_Pes) was also compared to PL_LAM and PL_CMV. We measured diaphragm electrical activity (Edi), ventilator pressure (PVent), esophageal pressure (Pes) and tidal volume. PL_LAM and PL_Pes were compared to themselves, and to PL_CMV for matching flows and volumes.

Results: Ten patients were included in the study. For the group, PL_LAM was closely similar to PL_CMV, with a high correlation (R2 = 0.88). Bland-Altman analysis revealed a low Bias of 0.28 cmH2O, and 1.96SD of 5.26 cmH2O. PL_LAM vs PL_Pes were also tightly related (R2 = 0.77).

Conclusion: This physiological study in patients confirms our previous pre-clinical data that PL_LAM is as good an estimate as PL_Pes to determine PL, in spontaneously breathing patients on assisted mechanical ventilation. Trial registration The study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (ID NCT05378802) on November 6, 2021.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
Intensive Care Medicine Experimental CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
2.90%
发文量
48
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信